BTech student jumps to death from 7th floor over hostel water row

News Network
October 22, 2019

Bengaluru, Oct 22: A 21-year-old final-year BTech student of Amrita School of Engineering committed suicide by jumping off the seventh floor of his college building alleging harassment by the college management, touching off protests by hundreds of students. The nub of the issue was shortage of water and substandard food in the college hostel.

The protest ended in the evening after Parappana Agrahara police assured students of stringent action against those responsible for the suicide of Sri Harsha, a resident of Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, who took the fatal leap around noon. He died on the way to hospital.

 The Electronics and Communication student, who was recently suspended from the college over his alleged role in vandalism on the campus, had received two offers — Rs 16 lakh a year and another for Rs 20 lakh a year — during campus placements.

According to police sources, the management threatened to get his placements cancelled. On Monday, Harsha and other students were in the thick of negotiations with the college management in the midst of which he rushed out of the college office and jumped to his death.

DCP (southeast) Isha Pant said they have taken up a case against the college management under IPC sections 306 (abetment to suicide) and 201 (destroying evidence) on the basis of a complaint filed by Harsha’s father, Vijay Bhaskar.

A student told mediapersons that Harsha and other students complained to the management about the shortage of water and substandard food in a hostel block on September 23, but did not get a favourable response. The students staged a protest during which windows of a lab, classrooms and college buses were damaged. The classes were suspended on September 24 and the college was closed from September 25 for Dasara.

A disciplinary committee conducted an inquiry into the ruckus. Based on its report, more than 20 students, including Harsha, were suspended for one year, the student said. According to documents, each of the suspended students was asked to pay Rs 25,000 as fine and Rs 50,000 as caution deposit.

Parents of the suspended students tried to approach the management, seeking the rollback of suspension, but were allegedly not allowed to even enter the campus.

“I came here on Monday to request the management to cancel the disciplinary action against my son. But they did not allow me inside the campus. My son went inside and I later came to know he had committed suicide by jumping off the hostel building. The college staff promptly cleaned blood from the spot where my son had fallen and tried to destroy the evidence,” Vijay Bhaskar told reporters.

DCP Pant confirmed Harsha appeared before the disciplinary committee at the college before taking the extreme step. “We learnt the committee threatened Harsha that he was the reason behind the vandalisation and they would cancel his placements,” Pant said.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
September 24,2024

siddaramaiah.jpg

The Karnataka High Court on Tuesday dismissed the petition filed by Chief Minister Siddaramaiah against Governor Thawarchand Gehlot's decision to sanction the complaint and investigation against him in the alleged Mysore Urban Development Authority (MUDA) scam case.

Justice M Nagaprasanna said the facts narrated in the petition would undoubtedly require an investigation.

The court has also said that the Governor's order approving sanction to investigate against Siddaramaiah under section 17A of the Prevention of Corruption Act does not suffer from application of mind, instead has abundance of application of mind.

Meanwhile, the court rejected the request made by senior advocate Abhishek Singhvi to stay the order of the court. The court has vacated the interim order passed on August 19. In the interim order the trial court was directed not to take any precipitative action against Siddaramaiah. On August 17, Governor had approved sanction under section 17 A  of the Prevention of Corruption Act and Section 218 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita ( BNSS), citing three applications.

The court said the private complainants were justified in registering the complaint and seeking approval from the governor.

Insofar as private complainants seeking sanction under section 17A, the court said the provision nowhere requires only a police officer to seek sanction from a competent authority. The court further said it is in fact the duty of the private complainants to seek such approval.

Earlier, The High Court had completed its hearing in the case on September 12, and reserved its orders. It had also directed a special court in Bengaluru to defer further proceedings and not to take any precipitative action against the Chief Minister.

The case pertains to allegations that compensatory sites were allotted to Siddaramaiah's wife B M Parvathi in an upmarket area in Mysuru that had higher property value as compared to the location of her land that had been "acquired" by MUDA.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
October 3,2024

brahmingundurao.jpg

Karnataka Health Minister Dinesh Gundu Rao reminded that V D Savarkar was not against cow slaughter as he himself was non-veg eater, PTI reported on Thursday.

"As a Brahmin he was eating meat, and he was openly propagating eating meat," said the minister at an event in Bengaluru.

Reacting to Gundu Rao's claim, BJP MP Anurag Thakur called Congress a "factory of lies" as he warned that India won't tolerate any disrespect towards Savarkar.

"By disrespecting Veer Savarkar they have shown that they don't respect freedom fighters. During the Congress government, Sardar Bhagat Singh was termed a separatist in textbooks...By making those who want to break the nation join the congress party, Rahul Gandhi is taking forward the ideology of 'tukde tukde' and he is a 'modern Jinnah' who speaks ill of the country abroad...," he said.

Meanwhile, a court in Maharashtra's Nashik district summoned Congress MP Rahul Gandhi earlier this week in a defamation case filed against him for his alleged objectionable remarks against the Hindutva ideologue.

The complainant, who is the director of an NGO, claimed he watched a press conference addressed by Gandhi in Hingoli and also a speech made by the Congress leader in November 2022.

He alleged that Gandhi, on the two occasions, by his words and visual representations knowingly harmed the reputation of Veer Savarkar and also tried to defame the latter's image in the society.

According to the complainant, Gandhi said "Savarkar is BJP and RSS jin" which was defamatory in nature.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
September 25,2024

siddru.jpg

In a significant development, a special court tasked with handling cases against Members of Parliament and Members of Legislative Assemblies (MP/MLAs) has ordered that a First Information Report (FIR) be filed regarding the Muda case.

Additionally, the Karnataka Lokayukta, which is an anti-corruption body, has been tasked with investigating allegations against Siddaramaiah, who is reportedly involved in the case.

The court instructed the Lokayukta (an anti-corruption authority) to provide a report within three months. It also ordered the relevant authorities to file a First Information Report (FIR) regarding the case.

Judge Santhosh Gajanan Bhat issued the directive, compelling the Mysuru Lokayukta police to commence an investigation following a formal complaint lodged by Snehamayi Krishna. 

The Karnataka Lokayukta in Mysuru is required to carry out the investigation under Section 156 (3) of the Criminal Procedure Code, which mandates the registration of a First Information Report (FIR).

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.