President reaches out to small and marginal farmers

Agencies
January 29, 2021

president.jpg

With farmers' agitation showing signs firming up further despite the police crackdown after the violence during the Republic Day tractor rally by farmer unions, the Government on Friday reached out to numerically dominating small and marginal farmers through President Ram Nath Kovind's address to the joint sitting of Budget Session beginning Friday.

Kovind assured farmers that the new farm laws have added new rights and facilities to them instead of taking away any of the rights existing previously.

The President flagged his strong disapproval of the act of a group of farmers storming the Red Fort and hoisting a religious flag there as well as the violence in the streets on Republic Day during the farmer protest.

"The insult of the tricolour and the pious Republic Day a few days ago is very unfortunate. The Constitution gives us the right to freedom of expression and also teaches us that law and rules should also be followed with the same earnestness," he said.

At the same time, Kovind also chose to flag that the government will go by the decision of the Supreme Court, which has put on hold the implementation of three farm laws.

"According full respect to the decision of the Supreme Court, my government will implement that," he said even as sought to make it clear that there has been no deduction in the rights and facilities that were available before the passage of these three farm laws. Rather the government has provided new rights along with providing new facilities to the farmers through these farm reforms," Kovind said.

Addressing the joint sitting, which was boycotted by nearly 20 Opposition parties, Kovind said that over 10 crore small farmers immediately started getting benefits of the three farm reform laws and recalled that many political parties had, from time to time, have given full support to these reforms taking into account the benefits accruing to small farmers. 

Stressing that Parliament passed these three laws after comprehensive deliberations, Kovind said these small and marginal farmers are in the priority list of the government.

He said in order to support such farmers in meeting their small expenses, the government has directly transferred around Rs 1,13,000 crores in their accounts under the PM-Kisan Samman Nidhi scheme.

The focus on the government's initiatives for small and marginal farmers. which constitute 82 percent of total number of farmers, in the President's speech during the Budget session — through which the government of the day lays out its vision and priority — is significant.

This is especially so as it comes at the backdrop of Opposition's attempt to paint the government anti-farmer and lend its full support to the farmers' stir, who have gathered on the outskirts of the national capital to protest against the farm laws.

"It is the demand of the time to pay special attention to small and marginal farmers in our agriculture sector, who have only one or two hectares of land. Of all the farmers in the country, more than 80 percent are these small farmers and they are more than 10 crore," Kovind said.

One of the criticisms of the ongoing farm agitation was that it was mainly led by relatively well-off farmers from Punjab, Haryana and Western UP, at least when it started two months back. The gathering later swelled with farmers from other states and other sections also joining it.

The President's address highlighting the achievements of "my government" talked at length about the measures taken by the Centre in the last six years since Prime Minister Narendra Modi-led BJP government was formed first in mid 2014.

"In the last six years the government has tried to bring positive change in all sectors from seed to marketing (beej se bazaar tak). My government has also taken the decision to implement the recommendations of M S Swaminathan Commission and provide farmers Minimum Support Price (MSP) of one and half times the production cost of foodgrains."

The President also flagged the rise in production of vegetables and foodgrain and the rise in the area of micro irrigation from 42 lakh hectare to 56 lakh hectare land in this period.

He said the Kisan Rail facility started by the government is writing a new chapter in providing markets to farmers as more than 38 thousand tonnes of foodgrain, fruit and vegetables have been transported by farmers from one region to another through more than 100 Kisan trains run so far.

"My government is giving special attention to modernising agriculture infrastructure to make agriculture more lucrative and for this an Agriculture Infrastructure Fund of  Rs 1,00,000 crore has been started. In order to create the foundational structure in the dairy sector and promote investment ther, the government has also set up a Dairy Infrastructure Development Fund (DIDF) worth 15,000 crore," the President said.

He also listed other measures like distribution of 20 lakh solar pumps under Pradhanmantri Kusum Yojan and the five-time rise in Ethanol production in last years as examples of the government's commitment to promote the agriculture sector and support farmers.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
November 26,2024

cmibrahim.jpg

Former minister and ex-MLC C M Ibrahim claimed that he still heads the original JD(S) and asked former prime minister and party supremo H D Deve Gowda to cut ties with the BJP, so that the party can be strengthened again. He also said options are being explored to either strengthen the JD(S) or to float a new regional party.

He was speaking to media persons, in Mysuru, on Monday, after meeting JD(S) MLA and former minister G T Deve Gowda, who has expressed his displeasure that he has been sidelined in the party and the party leaders have indicated his retirement from politics.

He stated, “If Deve Gowda had joined the Congress, during the last Assembly election, he would have been a minister now. We retained him in the JD(S), to strengthen the party. Now, efforts are being made to strangulate Deve Gowda’s political career. I have discussed all matters with Deve Gowda. In two days, I will start a Karnataka state tour and meet some leaders. After that, I will meet Deve Gowda again, and then decide on the further course of action.”

Ibrahim said, “The original JD(S) is ours. I am still its state president. All documents and accounts are in our name. Even now, if Deve Gowda leaves BJP’s company and returns, we will build the JD(S) again”.

“Union Minister H D Kumaraswamy should mend his ways and stop making JD(S) into a family-owned company. The JD(S)’s situation has become hopeless. Its love for the BJP is over. He should understand this,” he said.

“When I was with Kumaraswamy, he spent just Rs 4 crore in Channapatna and won by 20,000 votes. Now, without me, he spent Rs 150 crore and still lost by 25,000 votes. Without Muslims’ support, the JD(S) cannot win a single seat. Now, it is proved that 19 MLAs of the JD(S) won in 2023, because of Muslims,” he added.

Speaking on other options available, Ibrahim said, “We have not yet decided to go with the Congress. We are only considering to establish a third front. Whether it is founding a new regional party, forming a third front, or strengthening the JD(S), will be decided shortly.”

Earlier during the day, before meeting Deve Gowda, Ibrahim had said, that 12 to 13 JD(S) MLAs were dissatisfied with the party, but like Deve Gowda, were enduring pain.

“Now, I have started the task of uniting them. I as the JD(S) state president, it is my responsibility to address our MLAs’ grievances. At present, the JD(S) is on fire and all JD(S) MLAs want to protect their respective constituency. Hence, they have started speaking one by one,” he said.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
November 26,2024

buildingsgaza.jpg

The extremist Israeli finance minister has called for the occupation of the Gaza Strip and halving the population of the Palestinian territory that is reeling from almost 14 months of genocide.  

Bezalel Smotrich, who has a history of racist statements against Palestinians, made the controversial remarks during a conference of the Yesha Council settler group on Monday.

“We can occupy Gaza and thin the population by half within two years,” through encouraging the so-called “voluntary emigration," he said.

The racist minister also urged the Tel Aviv regime to use its favorable ties with the incoming administration of US President-elect Donald Trump to implement the plan.

“Occupying Gaza is not a dirty word,” he further claimed.

Once the success of the “voluntary emigration" is proven in the besieged Gaza Strip, it can be replicated in the occupied West Bank, he added.

Last month, Smotrich urged the full annexation of the West Bank and Gaza, asserting that Israel should unequivocally declare there would be no Palestinian state.

Israel launched its brutal Gaza onslaught on October 7, 2023, after the Palestinian Hamas resistance group carried out a historic operation against the usurping entity in retaliation for its intensified atrocities against the Palestinian people.

However, nearly 14 months into the offensive, the Tel Aviv regime has failed to achieve its declared objectives of finding captives held in Gaza and eliminating Hamas.

So far, the occupying regime has killed at least 44,235 Palestinians, mostly women and children, and injured 104,638 others, in Gaza. 

It has been committing the war crimes of starvation and of intentionally directing attacks against the civilian population in the besieged territory.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
November 13,2024

buldozerjustice.jpg

New Delhi: The Supreme Court took a firm stance on ‘bulldozer justice’ today, affirming that the Executive cannot bypass the Judiciary and that the legal process must not prejudge the guilt of an accused. In a significant judgment, the bench led by Justices BR Gavai and KV Viswanathan set new guidelines for demolition practices, responding to petitions challenging the controversial bulldozer actions taken against individuals accused of crimes.

The rise of this practice, termed 'bulldozer justice,' has seen authorities in various states demolish what they claim to be illegal structures belonging to accused individuals. However, multiple petitions questioned the legality and fairness of this approach, bringing the matter before the court.

Justice Gavai highlighted that owning a home is a cherished goal for many families, and an essential question was whether the Executive should have the authority to strip individuals of their shelter. “In a democracy, the rule of law protects citizens from arbitrary actions by the state. The criminal justice system must not assume guilt,” stated the bench, underscoring that due process is a fundamental right under the Constitution.

On the principle of separation of powers, the bench reinforced that the Judiciary alone holds adjudicatory powers and that the Executive cannot overstep these boundaries. Justice Gavai remarked, “When the state demolishes a home purely because its resident is accused of a crime, it violates the doctrine of separation of powers.”

The court issued a strong warning about accountability, stating that public officials who misuse their power or act arbitrarily must face consequences. Justice Gavai observed that selectively demolishing one property while ignoring similar cases suggests that the aim might be to penalize rather than enforce legality. “For most citizens, a house is the product of years of labor and dreams. Taking it away must be an action of last resort, thoroughly justified,” he said.

In its directives under Article 142 of the Constitution, the Supreme Court established new demolition guidelines. These include:

Mandatory Show-Cause Notice: No demolition should occur without first issuing a show-cause notice. The person served has a minimum of 15 days or the duration stated in local laws to respond.

Transparency of Notice Content: The notice must include specifics about the alleged unauthorized construction, the nature of the violation, and the rationale for demolition.

Hearing and Final Order: Authorities are required to hear the response of the affected individual before issuing a final order. The homeowner will have 15 days to address the issue, with demolition proceeding only if no stay order is obtained from an appellate authority.

Contempt Proceedings: Any breach of these guidelines would lead to contempt proceedings. Officials who disregard these norms will be personally accountable for restitution, with costs deducted from their salaries.

Additionally, the court mandated that all municipal bodies establish digital portals within three months, displaying show-cause notices and final orders on unauthorized structures to ensure public transparency and accountability.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.