Mangaluru City Corporation polls: BJP 44; Cong 14; SDPI 2

coastaldigest.com web desk
November 14, 2019

Mangaluru, Nov 14: The Bharatiya Janata Party has managed to wrest control over the Mangaluru City Corporation ending the Congress rule in the coast city.

There were 180 candidates in the fray in 60 wards of MCC. BJP, which had contested in all 60 wards, managed to win 44 seats whereas Congress won only 14 seats. The Social Democratic Party of India, which had one seat in the MCC, won two seats this time.

Full result:

Ward number 01: Surathkal West (Final)

BJP: Shobha Rajesh 985

Cong: Shantha S Rao 548

Ind: Revathi Puthran 760

 

Ward number 02: Surathkal East (Final)

BJP: Shwetha A 2496

Cong: Indira 1133

 

Ward number 03: Katipalla East (Final)

BJP: Lokesh Bollaje 2486

Cong: Basheer Ahmed 1680

JD(S): Nawaz Katipalla 484

 

Ward number 04: Katipalla Krishnapura (Final)

BJP: Lakshmi Shekar Devadiga 2675

Cong: Savitha Shetty 2127

 

Ward number 05: Katipalla North (Final)

SDPI: Shamshad Abubakkar 2766

BJP: Suraiyya 648

Cong: Fathima B 881

 

Ward number 06: Idya East (Final)

BJP: Saritha 2233

Cong: Vineetha Rao 1759

 

Ward number 07: Idya West (Final)

BJP: Nayana Kotian 2282

Cong: Prathibha Kulai 1710

 

Ward number 08: Hosabettu (Final)

BJP: Varun Chowta 3030

Cong: Ashok Shetty 1765

JD(S): Ronald Fernandes 47

 

Ward number 09: Kulai (Final)

BJP: Vedavathi 3140

Cong: Gayathri 768

 

Ward number 10: Baikampady (Final)

BJP: Sumithra Kariya 2002

Cong: Sudhakara 877

 

Ward number 11: Panambur Bengre (Final)

Cong: Chandrika 1081

BJP: Sunitha 1236

JD(S): Shobha 369

CPI: Sunitha Krishna 888

 

Ward number 12: Panjimogaru (Final)

BJP: Naveen Chandra B Poojary 1690

Cong: Anil Kumar 1359

 

Ward number 13: Kunjathbail North (Final)

BJP: Sharath Kumar 2950

Cong: K Mohammed 1709

 

Ward number 14: Marakada (Final)

BJP: Lohith Amin 2055

Cong: Harinath 1704

 

Ward number 15: Kunjathbail South (Final)

BJP: Sumangala 3780

Cong: Shalini M N 1684

 

Ward number 16: Bengre Kulur (Final)

BJP: Kiran Kumar 2308

Cong: Panduranga Kukkyan 976

Ind: Chandrashekar 543

Nota 18

 

Ward number 17: Derebail North (Final)

BJP: Manoj Kumar 2142

Cong: Mallikarjuna 1369

 

Ward number 18: Kavoor (Final)

BJP: Gayathri A 3296

Cong: Bhavya 1725

 

Ward number 19: Pacchanady (Final)

BJP: Sangeetha R Nayak 2700

Cong: Vishalakshi 1544

 

Ward number 20: Tiruvail (Final)

BJP: Hemalatha Raghu Salian 3028

Cong: Prathibha R Shetty 1903

 

Ward number 21: Padavu West (Final)

BJP: Vanitha Prasad 3071

Cong: Ashalatha 1499

 

Ward number 22: Kadri Padav (Final)

BJP: Jayananda Anchan 2484

Cong: Umesh 1963

 

Ward number 23: Derebail East (Final)

BJP: Rajani L Kotian 2849

Cong: Jyothi L Devadiga 1583

 

Ward number 24: Derebail South (Final)

Cong: M Shashidhar Hegde 2235

BJP: Charith Kumar 1908

 

Ward number 25: Derebail West (Final)

BJP: Jayalakshmi V Shetty 2233

Cong: Roopa Chethan 1331

 

Ward number 26 : Derebail Central (Final)

BJP: Ganesh Kulal 3052

Cong: B Padmanabha Amin 1275

 

Ward number 27: Boloor (Final)

BJP: Jagadish Shetty 2360

Cong: Kamalaksha Salian 988

 

Ward number 28: Mannagudda (Final)

BJP: Sandhya 3019

Cong: Meghanadas 698

 

Ward number 29: Kambla (Final)

BJP: Leelavathi Prakash 1884

Cong: Rekha Surekha 518

 

Ward number 30: Kodialbail (Final)

BJP: Sudeer Shetty Kannur 1846

Cong: Prakash B Salian 1661

 

Ward number 31: Bejai (Final)

Cong: Lancelot Pinto 1939

BJP: Prashanth Alva 1527

 

Ward number 32: Kadri North (Final)

BJP: Shakeela Kava 1813

Cong: Mamatha Shetty 791

 

Ward number 33: Kadri South (Final)

BJP: Manohar Shetty 1526

Cong: D K Ashok 1277

 

Ward number 34: Shivbagh (Final)

BJP: Kavya Natraj 1731

Cong: Kiran James Peter 1690

 

Ward number 35 : Padavu Central (Final)

BJP: Kishore Kottari 2200

Cong: Abdul Azeez 610

 

Ward number 36: Padav East (Final)

Cong: Bhaskar K 2492

BJP: Sujan Das 1921

 

Ward number 37: Maroli (Final)

Cong: Keshava 2037

BJP: Kiran Devadiga 2011

 

Ward number 38: Bendoor (Final)

Cong: Naveen R D Souza 1578

BJP: Jessel D Souza 469

 

Ward number 39 : Falnir (Final)

Cong: Jacintha Alfred 1762

BJP: Asha D Silva 1423

 

Ward number 40: Court (Final)

Cong: Vinayaraj A C 1137

BJP: Ranganath Kini 899

 

Ward number 41: Central Market (Final)

BJP: Poornima 2037

Cong: Mamatha Shenoy 428

Ind: Rekha Surendra 210

 

Ward number 42: Donkarakery

BJP: M Jayashree Kudva

Cong: Manjula Y Nayak

 

Ward number 43: Kudroli (Final)

Cong: Shamshudin 1256

BJP: Arshad 877

JD(S): Aziz Kudroli 612

SDPI: Murzain Kudroli 1121

 

Ward number 44: Bunder (Final)

Cong: Zeenath 1308

BJP: Priyanka 1281

JD(S): Rameeza Nasir 1150

 

Ward number 45: Port (Final)

Cong: Abdul Lateef 2043

BJP: Anil Kumar 1493

 

Ward number 46: Contonment

BJP: Diwakar

Cong: K Bhaskar Rao

 

Ward number 47: Milagres

BJP: Ghanshyam

Cong: Abdul Rauf

 

Ward number 48: Kankanady Valencia

BJP: Sandeep Garodi

Cong: Ashith Gregory

 

Ward number 49: Kankanady

BJP: Vijay Kumar Shetty

Cong: Praveen Chandra Alva

 

Ward number 50: Alape South

BJP: Shobha Poojary

Cong: Sesamma

 

Ward number 51: Alape North (Final)

BJP: Roopashree Poojary 2073

Cong: Shobha K 2007

 

Ward number 52: Kannur (Final)

BJP: Chandravathi Vishwanath 1862

Cong: Raziya 1591

 

Ward number 53: Bajal

BJP: Chandrashekara

Cong: Ashraf

 

Ward number 54: Jeppinamogaru

BJP: Veena Mangala

Cong: Madhushree

 

Ward number 55: Attavara

BJP: Shailesh Shetty

Cong: Keerthi Raj

 

Ward number 56: Mangaladevi (Final)

BJP: Premananda Shetty 2187

Cong: Dinesh V Rao 874

JD(S): N Mahesh Rao 60

NOTA: 17

 

Ward number 57: Hoigebazar (Final)

BJP: Revathi 2116

Cong: Sharmila 1258

 

Ward number 58: Bolara (Final)

BJP: Bhanumathi P S 1541

Cong: Rathikala 1348

 

Ward number 59: Jeppu

BJP: Bharath Kumar

Cong: T Honnaya

 

Ward number 60: Bengre (Final)

SDPI: Muneeb Bengre 1701

BJP: Gangadhar Salian 1498

Cong: Asif Ahmed 1192

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
October 3,2024

brahmingundurao.jpg

Karnataka Health Minister Dinesh Gundu Rao reminded that V D Savarkar was not against cow slaughter as he himself was non-veg eater, PTI reported on Thursday.

"As a Brahmin he was eating meat, and he was openly propagating eating meat," said the minister at an event in Bengaluru.

Reacting to Gundu Rao's claim, BJP MP Anurag Thakur called Congress a "factory of lies" as he warned that India won't tolerate any disrespect towards Savarkar.

"By disrespecting Veer Savarkar they have shown that they don't respect freedom fighters. During the Congress government, Sardar Bhagat Singh was termed a separatist in textbooks...By making those who want to break the nation join the congress party, Rahul Gandhi is taking forward the ideology of 'tukde tukde' and he is a 'modern Jinnah' who speaks ill of the country abroad...," he said.

Meanwhile, a court in Maharashtra's Nashik district summoned Congress MP Rahul Gandhi earlier this week in a defamation case filed against him for his alleged objectionable remarks against the Hindutva ideologue.

The complainant, who is the director of an NGO, claimed he watched a press conference addressed by Gandhi in Hingoli and also a speech made by the Congress leader in November 2022.

He alleged that Gandhi, on the two occasions, by his words and visual representations knowingly harmed the reputation of Veer Savarkar and also tried to defame the latter's image in the society.

According to the complainant, Gandhi said "Savarkar is BJP and RSS jin" which was defamatory in nature.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
September 24,2024

siddaramaiah.jpg

The Karnataka High Court on Tuesday dismissed the petition filed by Chief Minister Siddaramaiah against Governor Thawarchand Gehlot's decision to sanction the complaint and investigation against him in the alleged Mysore Urban Development Authority (MUDA) scam case.

Justice M Nagaprasanna said the facts narrated in the petition would undoubtedly require an investigation.

The court has also said that the Governor's order approving sanction to investigate against Siddaramaiah under section 17A of the Prevention of Corruption Act does not suffer from application of mind, instead has abundance of application of mind.

Meanwhile, the court rejected the request made by senior advocate Abhishek Singhvi to stay the order of the court. The court has vacated the interim order passed on August 19. In the interim order the trial court was directed not to take any precipitative action against Siddaramaiah. On August 17, Governor had approved sanction under section 17 A  of the Prevention of Corruption Act and Section 218 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita ( BNSS), citing three applications.

The court said the private complainants were justified in registering the complaint and seeking approval from the governor.

Insofar as private complainants seeking sanction under section 17A, the court said the provision nowhere requires only a police officer to seek sanction from a competent authority. The court further said it is in fact the duty of the private complainants to seek such approval.

Earlier, The High Court had completed its hearing in the case on September 12, and reserved its orders. It had also directed a special court in Bengaluru to defer further proceedings and not to take any precipitative action against the Chief Minister.

The case pertains to allegations that compensatory sites were allotted to Siddaramaiah's wife B M Parvathi in an upmarket area in Mysuru that had higher property value as compared to the location of her land that had been "acquired" by MUDA.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
October 3,2024

cancer.jpg

Bengaluru: The Karnataka Food Safety and Quality Department has issued an urgent warning following the discovery of potentially cancer-causing chemicals in cakes sold by certain bakeries across the state.

Recent tests conducted by the department revealed that some cake samples, particularly those with vibrant colors, contain harmful synthetic coloring agents such as Allura Red, a substance known to pose health risks. The findings have raised concerns about the use of artificial colors in bakery products, especially given their potential link to cancer and other serious health conditions.

"We routinely test various food products, and this time, our officials noticed unusually dark-colored cakes on the market," said Srinivas K, Commissioner of Food Safety for Karnataka. "Upon testing, we found that a few cakes contained Allura Red, a synthetic dye associated with health risks."

The use of artificial colors, especially in popular cakes like red velvet and pineapple varieties, is widespread as it attracts customers, particularly children. However, many bakers prefer using natural, safer alternatives, while some opt for synthetic dyes to enhance the cake's visual appeal.

"Most bakeries use permissible, natural colors that are safe for consumption. Unfortunately, a few are resorting to synthetic dyes just to make their cakes more attractive," said a bakery owner from Electronic City, speaking anonymously.

Medical experts are warning that consuming synthetic colors can lead to numerous health issues, including asthma and allergic reactions.

"Some of these artificial dyes are carcinogenic, and prolonged exposure could have serious consequences, especially for children and young adults," cautioned Dr. Vandana G, a private medical practitioner.

While the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) confirms that only a limited number of samples tested positive for harmful colors, legal action is being taken against the violators.

"There is no need for widespread panic or halting production. We are closely monitoring the situation, and only a few bakeries were found to be non-compliant. Rest assured, appropriate legal measures are underway," assured an FSSAI official. 

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.