Mangaluru: Transport operators protest against new Road Transport bill

[email protected] (CD Network)
April 26, 2015

Mangaluru, Apr 26: Office bearers and members of Dakshina Kannada district Karmika Parishad held a protest in front of the deputy commissioner's office here on Saturday, against the Road Transport and Safety Bill, 2014 proposed by the NDA government, which is slated to be tabled in the next session of the Lok Sabha.

Addressing the protestors, president of the Karmika Parishad Ivan D'Souza said that the Centre wanted to repeal the Indian Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and implement a new bill which would take away the livelihood of several labourers such as privately-owned taxi drivers, auto-rickshaw drivers and bus drivers. The ones currently running private driving schools will not be allowed to run their businesses if the new bill is passed. The same will be the fate of private garage owners and mechanics employed there, he said, adding that the bill was brought merely for the benefit of multinational and corporate companies.

Urging the Centre to withdraw the bill, Mr D'Souza said that a person had to shell out Rs 5,000 while applying for a driving licence under the new proposed bill, while also re-taking driving test at the time of renewing the licence. The new bill also demands that a driving instructor should own a minimum of 15 acres of land to run a driving school, and also requires a driving driving track to have the same requirements, he said, adding that the new bill, if implemented, would leave several transport operators without any means of income.

Speaking on th occasion, president of Kanara Bus Owners' Association K Rajavarma Ballal said that the new Road Transport bill would affect the local transport operators such as bus owners and taxi owners as well as drivers if it was passed. Instead of repealing the Motor Vehicles Act of 1988, the central government could have made necessary amendments to the existing Act as required.

All the legal fines for traffic offences have been increased, while the legal maximum punishment for committing a road accident has been increased to seven years' in jail, which is a deterrent to transport operators such as drivers who depend on it for their livelihood, he said, stressing that the central government should concentrate on improving the existing network of roads in the country before tabling the bill.

He opined that the number of traffic problems would increase instead of decreasing if the new bill was implemented. Corporator Praveenchandra Alva, NSUI president Ashith Pereira, DK youth Congress president Mithun Rai and others were present.

congress protest 1

congress protest 2

congress protest 3

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
September 25,2024

siddru.jpg

In a significant development, a special court tasked with handling cases against Members of Parliament and Members of Legislative Assemblies (MP/MLAs) has ordered that a First Information Report (FIR) be filed regarding the Muda case.

Additionally, the Karnataka Lokayukta, which is an anti-corruption body, has been tasked with investigating allegations against Siddaramaiah, who is reportedly involved in the case.

The court instructed the Lokayukta (an anti-corruption authority) to provide a report within three months. It also ordered the relevant authorities to file a First Information Report (FIR) regarding the case.

Judge Santhosh Gajanan Bhat issued the directive, compelling the Mysuru Lokayukta police to commence an investigation following a formal complaint lodged by Snehamayi Krishna. 

The Karnataka Lokayukta in Mysuru is required to carry out the investigation under Section 156 (3) of the Criminal Procedure Code, which mandates the registration of a First Information Report (FIR).

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
September 20,2024

HCpakistanijudge.jpg

New Delhi: The Supreme Court today sought a report from the Karnataka High Court over controversial remarks made by Justice Vedavyasachar Srishananda during a recent court hearing.

Justice Srishananda, while addressing a landlord-tenant dispute, referred to a Muslim-majority area in Bengaluru as "Pakistan" and made a misogynistic comment involving a woman lawyer. 

A five-judge bench led by Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud, along with Justices S Khanna, B R Gavai, S Kant, and H Roy, expressed the need for establishing clear guidelines for constitutional court judges regarding their remarks in court. 

The Supreme Court bench said that when social media plays an active role in monitoring and amplifying courtroom proceedings, there is an urgency to ensure judicial commentary aligns with the decorum expected from courts of law.

"Our attention has been drawn to some comments made by Karnataka High Court judge Justice V Srishananda during the conduct of judicial proceedings. We have asked the AG and SG to assist us. We ask the registrar general of the High Court to submit a report to this court after seeking administrative directions from the Chief Justice of Karnataka High Court. This exercise may be carried out in 2 weeks," the top court directed.

Videos of Justice Srishanananda have gone viral on social media.

In one video, he refers to a Muslim-dominated locality in Bengaluru as "Pakistan" and on another video he was seen making objectionable comments against a woman lawyer. In the second incident, Justice Srishanananda can be heard telling the woman lawyer that she seemed to know a lot about the "opposition party", so much so that she might be able to reveal the colour of their undergarments.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
September 19,2024

Muniratna.jpg

Ramanagara, Sep 19: A case of rape, sexual harassment and criminal intimidation has been registered against BJP MLA Munirathna and six others, police said on Thursday.

It was registered following the complaint of a 40-year-old woman who alleged that the incident took place at a private resort within the Kaggalipura police station’s jurisdiction.

“We received a complaint on Wednesday night and based on it, we have registered case against seven people, including the BJP MLA under various sections for rape by public servant, sexual harassment, criminal intimidation, criminal conspiracy, voyeurism, intentional insult with intent to provoke breach of peace, Information Technology Act, and others,” a senior police officer said.

The matter is being investigated, he said.

The fresh FIR against the BJP MLA, also a former Minister, comes days after he was arrested by the Bengaluru Police in connection with the two cases filed against him for alleged harassment, threats and casteist abuse, police said.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.