DK-Udupi GP poll results: BJP gains upper hand; SDPI strengthens its presence

coastaldigest.com news network
December 30, 2020

bjpsdpi.JPG

Mangaluru/Udupi, Dec 30: Counting for votes of for the recently-concluded gram panchayat elections is underway across Karnataka. In twin coastal districts of Dakshina Kannada and Udupi BJP backed candidates are reportedly gaining upper hands.

Winners list:

For the first time SDPI opens its account in Talapady gram panchayat.

In Kadekar gram panchayat, five Congress candidates Tharanath, Leelavathi, Sukanya, Indira Shetty, Ramesh Kotian won the polls.

Konaje fourth ward, Congress supported candidate Mohammed Iqbal won the elections.

SDPI opens its account in Harekala gram panchayat.

Talapady gram panchayat in two wards, Zahir 2 ward and Mohammed in third world won the elections.

At Kallianpur gram panchayat, Vishukumar and Rathna

At Kodibettu gram panchayat, Yashodha won the elections with 375 votes, Vinay Kumar with 396 votes won the elections.

At Bellampalli gram panchayat, Dayanand and Usha won the elections.

At Anjaru, Indira Poojary won the elections 279 won the election. Sandeep Kumar won the election with 412 votes

At Kukkehalli gram panchayat, Usha won the elections with 311 votes.

Pavoor gram panchayat Congress supported candidates, Rathikala and Riyaz won the elections.

At Amblamoger, Congress supported candidate Ravindra Kukkian and Shwetha supported by BJP won the election.

BJP supported candidates, Dayananda, Mamatha won the elections. Mumthaz of Congress won Amblamoger gram panchayat elections.

At Kurkalu gram panchayat, BJP supported candidates Praveen Kumar and Mallika won the election.

At Palimaru gram panchayat, BJP supported Mahesh Shetty and Rashmi won the election.

At Ellooru, BJP supported candidates Usha Rao and Raviraj won the election.

At Kodibettu gram panchayat, BJP supported four candidates won the elections.

At Yermal Bada, BJP supported candidates Indira S Shetty and Deepak won the election.

Majoor, BJP supported candidate Madhusudhan Salian won the elections and Vanitha won the elections.

At Kote, Congress supported candidate Prameela Prashanth Jathanna and BJP supported candidate Rathnakar Kotian won the elections.

Two BJP supported candidates Usha and Jayanand Naik won the elections At Kukkehalli.

At Hejmady, BJP supported candidate Mohan Suvarana and Suvina Furtado won the elections.

At Shirva Mattaru Manibettu, BJP supported candidate Suresh Nayak and Mamatha Shetty won the polls.

At Padubidri, BJP supported candidates, Shobha Shetty, Sandhesh Kumari and Jayalakshmi won the election.

Paduthonse gram panchayat Bengre ward, BJP supported Deerendra won the elections with 337 votes and Lokesh with 367 votes.

BJP supported Prathibha Baskar unanimously elected. BJP secured 3 seats, Congress secured 2 seats.

In Udupi taluk, Congress supported candidate Prabhath Kumar won the election securing 290 votes.

Bhramavar Yadthadi ward Lokesh Independent candidate won with 80 votes.

In Sullia taluk, BJP supported candidate are in the lead including Ivathaklu gram panchayat.

Two Congress and two BJP supported candidates Anjar Sandeep and Vinay have won the elections in Udyavar gram panchayat.

Karthik Ballal won the elections in Amunje gram panchayat in Bantwal.

BJP supported candidates Richarad Goveas and Gayathri won the elections in Padanagady gram panchayat of Beltangady taluk.

At Belapu gram panchayat, Prakash Rao won the elections with 405 votes.

Congress supported candidate Farida won elections with 359 votes in Hejamadi gram panchayat.

At Badagabettu gram panchayat, Ganapathi Kamath and Lakshmi won the elections. Both are candidates supported by the BJP.

At Harekala ward, Congress supported Mohammed Hanif and Konaje ward BJP supported candidate Geetha won the elections. Also, SDPI supported Rehna Mohammad won the polls.

At Kelarakala Bettu gram panchayat Anusha and Suresh won the elections.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
November 11,2024

hospital.jpg

Mangaluru: In a deeply tragic turn of events, a 28-year-old woman named Ranjitha, who had recently given birth but tragically lost her newborn, ended her life by suicide on Monday. She reportedly leapt from the fourth-floor window of Lady Goschen Hospital’s luggage room.

Ranjitha, whose strength and resilience had carried her through a difficult pregnancy, was scheduled for discharge on Monday. Her journey to Lady Goschen Hospital began on October 24, when she was transferred from Karkala. She was a high-risk patient, battling both hypertension and diabetes. At the time of her admission, she was just 27 weeks pregnant.

Due to the complexities of her health, doctors made the difficult decision to perform an emergency C-section on October 30. She delivered a baby girl, premature and weighing only 960 grams. The newborn was immediately moved to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, where doctors did all they could. Despite these efforts, the baby passed away on November 3.

Ranjitha’s sorrow was profound. She stayed under hospital care even after her initial recovery and was preparing to go home on November 9. She had even requested a couple more days at the hospital, seeking time perhaps to cope with her unimaginable grief.

On the day of her discharge, a discharge card ready and her family eagerly waiting to take her home, Ranjitha reportedly made her way to the luggage room in the early hours. There, standing on a cot placed for patients' family members, she climbed to a window and fell from the fourth floor. Despite the attempts of another visitor to intervene, tragedy was inevitable. She was rushed to Government Wenlock Hospital, where doctors confirmed the worst—she was no more.

Dr. Durgaparasad M R, the Medical Superintendent at Lady Goschen Hospital, shared his grief and spoke of the ongoing investigation. A post-mortem is to be conducted, and the local Tahsildar will complete the necessary inquest procedures. Ranjitha’s exact reasons for taking this step are yet to be confirmed, though the weight of her recent losses paints a sorrowful picture.

If you or anyone you know is struggling emotionally, please remember that help is available. Reach out to mental health experts who can provide support and guidance. The toll-free helpline number 9152987821 is available to assist anyone in distress.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
November 13,2024

buldozerjustice.jpg

New Delhi: The Supreme Court took a firm stance on ‘bulldozer justice’ today, affirming that the Executive cannot bypass the Judiciary and that the legal process must not prejudge the guilt of an accused. In a significant judgment, the bench led by Justices BR Gavai and KV Viswanathan set new guidelines for demolition practices, responding to petitions challenging the controversial bulldozer actions taken against individuals accused of crimes.

The rise of this practice, termed 'bulldozer justice,' has seen authorities in various states demolish what they claim to be illegal structures belonging to accused individuals. However, multiple petitions questioned the legality and fairness of this approach, bringing the matter before the court.

Justice Gavai highlighted that owning a home is a cherished goal for many families, and an essential question was whether the Executive should have the authority to strip individuals of their shelter. “In a democracy, the rule of law protects citizens from arbitrary actions by the state. The criminal justice system must not assume guilt,” stated the bench, underscoring that due process is a fundamental right under the Constitution.

On the principle of separation of powers, the bench reinforced that the Judiciary alone holds adjudicatory powers and that the Executive cannot overstep these boundaries. Justice Gavai remarked, “When the state demolishes a home purely because its resident is accused of a crime, it violates the doctrine of separation of powers.”

The court issued a strong warning about accountability, stating that public officials who misuse their power or act arbitrarily must face consequences. Justice Gavai observed that selectively demolishing one property while ignoring similar cases suggests that the aim might be to penalize rather than enforce legality. “For most citizens, a house is the product of years of labor and dreams. Taking it away must be an action of last resort, thoroughly justified,” he said.

In its directives under Article 142 of the Constitution, the Supreme Court established new demolition guidelines. These include:

Mandatory Show-Cause Notice: No demolition should occur without first issuing a show-cause notice. The person served has a minimum of 15 days or the duration stated in local laws to respond.

Transparency of Notice Content: The notice must include specifics about the alleged unauthorized construction, the nature of the violation, and the rationale for demolition.

Hearing and Final Order: Authorities are required to hear the response of the affected individual before issuing a final order. The homeowner will have 15 days to address the issue, with demolition proceeding only if no stay order is obtained from an appellate authority.

Contempt Proceedings: Any breach of these guidelines would lead to contempt proceedings. Officials who disregard these norms will be personally accountable for restitution, with costs deducted from their salaries.

Additionally, the court mandated that all municipal bodies establish digital portals within three months, displaying show-cause notices and final orders on unauthorized structures to ensure public transparency and accountability.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
November 11,2024

birensingh.jpg

The Manipur Kuki MLAs have released a statement calling out Solicitor General Tushar Mehta's 'lies' in the Supreme Court. In a joint statement, the MLAs, including those from the Bharatiya Janata Party, said they had not had any meeting with the Chief Minister since May 3, 2023, nor did they intend to meet him in the future as “he was the mastermind behind the violence”.

As per the MLAs, the SG lied about state CM N Biren Singh speaking to Kuki MLAs to control the situation there, in order to halt a Supreme Court probe into the leaked tapes which allege that Singh has been complicit in the violence that broke out between Kukis and Meitis there.

"We...clarify that we have never had any meeting with Chief Minister, Shri N. Biren Singh since May 3, 2023, nor have any intention to meet him in future as he is the mastermind behind the violence and ethnic cleansing of our people from the Imphal valley, which is continuing till today, the latest being the brutal killing and burning of Mrs Zosangkim Hmar on November 7, 2024," the letter read, while condemning the recent 'barbaric' killing of the woman there, and noting the SG's assertion is 'tantamount' to misleading the top court.

“We, the undersigned ten MLAs, have come to know that during the Supreme Court hearing held on November 8, 2024, the Solicitor General of India submitted that ‘CM is meeting all Kuki MLAs and trying to bring the situation down to get peace’. In this connection, we hereby categorically state that this submission is a blatant lie and tantamount to misleading the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India,” the statement said.

The Supreme Court, while hearing a petition by a Kuki organisation, asked that it submit audio tapes to substantiate its claim that the Chief Minister was instrumental in inciting and organising violence in the northeastern State.

Solicitor-General Tushar Mehta orally informed the court that the Chief Minister was meeting all the Kuki-Zo MLAs and that peace in the State had come at a huge cost.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.