State govt's power purchase deal with UPCL illegal, expensive'

March 9, 2011

HGD

Udupi, Mar 9: Executive President of Jana Jagruthi Samithi, Nandikooru, Balakrishna Shetty accused the Yediyurappa Government of purchasing power from Udupi Power Corporation Limited (UPCL) without fixing the unit price and without an approved Power Purchase Agreement ratified by the Karnataka Electricity Regulatory Commission, as per the applicable laws.

In a press release, Shetty said that without the power purchase agreement between the power project and the government and without such agreement duly approved by CERC and ratified by the KERC the UPCL has no right to produce power and the plant should immediately shut down on this ground as well.

He said that information received by the Samithi from both the regulatory authorities - Central Electricity Regulatory Commission, New Delhi (CERC) and Karnataka Electricity Regulatory Commission, Bangalore (KERC) - reveal that neither the tariff has been approved by the CERC nor the KERC ratified the Power Purchase Agreement. The purchase of power obviously is made illegally at a high price by the government utility, the Power Corporation of Karnataka Limited and KPTCL.

The project is approved as the mega-power project and qualifies for various benefits like custom duty exemption and certain tax holidays etc. As the project is to supply power to more than one State the tariff is required to be decided by the CERC. It may be recalled that CERC had granted in-principle approval of the capital cost at Rs 4299.12 crores in October 2006 based on the equipment supply by BHEL. The UPCL terminated the agreement with BHEL and purchased far cheaper and perhaps reconditioned equipments without any guaranteed life span from Dong Fang of China.

The cost of the project based on other projects that used Chinese equipments should not be over 3720 crores for the increased capacity of 1200mw. The former Managing Director of KPTCL Bharat Lal Meena has stated that the company should reduce the project cost by at least 600 crores so that cheaper power is made available to the consumers. The Company on the contrary has been claiming increase of 600 crores in the project cost in the name of increase in the capacity.

In the background of the district in-charge Minister Dr VS Acharya's press statement that the State has released Rs 583 crores to the company, the basis of such release of funds becomes highly questionable. While the State is virtually being blackmailed in the name of power shortage large scale embezzlement of State funds on account of this project cannot be ruled out, he alleged.

Samithi demanded the authorities including the Governor and the Judiciary to take the matter suo-motto to get to the bottom of the issue and punish the culprits.


Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
November 18,2024

boylighting.jpg

Mangaluru: A 14-year-old boy, Subodh, tragically lost his life after being struck by lightning while sitting outside his home in Kedila village, Bantwal taluk, on Sunday evening.

The incident occurred around 5:30 PM while Subodh, an 8th-grade student at Kalladka Shriram High School, was seated outside his house. Lightning struck him, leaving him unconscious. 

Family members rushed him to a nearby clinic and later to a private hospital in Puttur, where doctors confirmed his death upon arrival.

The boy's body was sent to Puttur Government Hospital for a post-mortem.

Tahsildar Archana Bhat has directed revenue officials to assist the grieving family. Vitla Revenue Inspector Prashanth Shetty, Village Administrative Officer Anil Kumar, Kedila Panchayat President Harish Valtaje, and panchayat members visited the family to offer their condolences and support.

This heartbreaking incident highlights the unpredictability of nature’s fury, leaving a community mourning the untimely loss of a young life.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
November 14,2024

srirang.jpg

Bengaluru: The Prime Minister Narendra Modi led union government has requested the Karnataka High Court to direct the Mandya district administration and the state government to clear a madrasa operating within the premises of the historic Jama Masjid in Srirangapatna.

The Waqf Board, opposing this move, has claimed the mosque as its property and defended the right to conduct madrasa activities there.

The matter was brought before a division bench headed by Chief Justice N V Anjaria following a public interest litigation filed by a person named Abhishek Gowda from Kabbalu village in Kanakapura taluk. The petition alleged “unauthorised madrasa activities” within the mosque.

Representing the Central government, Additional Solicitor General of India for High Court of Karnataka, K Arvind Kamath argued that the Jama Masjid was designated as a protected monument in 1951, yet unauthorised madrasa operations continue there.

He noted that concerns over potential law and order issues have so far prevented any intervention. Kamath urged the court to direct the Mandya district administration to take action and vacate the madrasa from the mosque.

In defence, lawyers for the state government and the Waqf Board contested this request, stating that the Waqf Board had been recognised as the owner of the property since 1963 and, thus, conducting madrasa activities there is lawful.

After hearing both sides, the bench adjourned the case for further arguments, scheduling the next hearing for November 20.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
November 22,2024

Mangaluru: A man fell victim to an online scam, losing Rs 1.7 crore after fraudsters posed as officials from TRAI. According to a complaint filed at the CEN police station, the incident began on November 11, when the complainant received a call from an unknown number at 9:49 am.

The caller, claiming to represent TRAI, alleged that another mobile number registered under the complainant's name was involved in illegal activities in Andheri (East), Mumbai. The caller further stated that an FIR was lodged against the complainant for harassment under the guise of marketing. He was instructed to contact Andheri (East) police station immediately or risk his mobile service being deactivated within two hours.

The complainant was subsequently connected to an individual named Pradeep Sawant, who claimed the complainant was implicated in a money laundering scheme linked to the Naresh Goyal fraud case. Sawant alleged that a fraudulent bank account under the complainant's name was opened at Canara Bank, Andheri, and used to purchase a SIM card for illegal activities. He warned that the complainant could face arrest.

Later, the complainant was contacted via WhatsApp video call by individuals posing as Rahul Kumar (a police officer) and Akanksha (a CBI officer). They allegedly sent fabricated CBI documents to his WhatsApp number. The fraudsters demanded money to "resolve" the case. Fearing threats, the complainant allegedly transferred Rs 1.7 crore through RTGS in batches of Rs 53 lakh, Rs 74 lakh, and Rs 44 lakh between November 13 and 19. A case has been registered at the CEN police station and an investigation is ongoing.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.