Complaints filed by Dalits are settled by police with a compromise'

April 3, 2011
dalits

Mangalore, April 3: Representatives of Dalits have urged the district police to take appropriate measures to effectively implement the Scheduled Castes and Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act-1989 in Dakshina Kannada, as in many instances the cases filed by Dalits end up with a “compromise”.



The voice against finalising the cases filed by Dalits, especially Dalit women was raised during the monthly grievance meeting of SC/ST as usually held at the office of Superintendent of Police here on Sunday. However, the new SP of DK Labu Ram, who was supposed to hear the grievances of the people of marginalised section, was not present in the meeting, due to unavoidable reasons.



T Sarvothama Pai, Superintendent of Police, Citizen Rights Implementation Directorate and BJ Bhandari, DySP of Mangalore DCRB responded to the questions and problems raised by the participants of meeting.



P Keshava, a Dalit leader said that even though police register a case in crimes against Dalits, later, they settle them with compromises. “There are dozens of such instances in the district. In many instances where Dalit women were cheated by men after developing sexual contact under the pretext of love, the police have played the role of brokers to make compromise between two parties, apparently to help the accused,” he said, questioning if it is just to finish a criminal case with a compromise? Criminals should be punished, especially in atrocity cases, he argued.



Bhandari said that police abide by the law in all cases and according to law, atrocity cases should be handled by the police officer of the rank of DySP or above. “Normally, the inquiry of atrocity cases go on the supervision of SP and hence, there are less chances of accused using their influence to bring an end to the case under the pretext of compromise,” he said adding that “If those who had lodged complaint, choose to withdraw it, you cannot blame the police”.




Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
November 14,2024

srirang.jpg

Bengaluru: The Prime Minister Narendra Modi led union government has requested the Karnataka High Court to direct the Mandya district administration and the state government to clear a madrasa operating within the premises of the historic Jama Masjid in Srirangapatna.

The Waqf Board, opposing this move, has claimed the mosque as its property and defended the right to conduct madrasa activities there.

The matter was brought before a division bench headed by Chief Justice N V Anjaria following a public interest litigation filed by a person named Abhishek Gowda from Kabbalu village in Kanakapura taluk. The petition alleged “unauthorised madrasa activities” within the mosque.

Representing the Central government, Additional Solicitor General of India for High Court of Karnataka, K Arvind Kamath argued that the Jama Masjid was designated as a protected monument in 1951, yet unauthorised madrasa operations continue there.

He noted that concerns over potential law and order issues have so far prevented any intervention. Kamath urged the court to direct the Mandya district administration to take action and vacate the madrasa from the mosque.

In defence, lawyers for the state government and the Waqf Board contested this request, stating that the Waqf Board had been recognised as the owner of the property since 1963 and, thus, conducting madrasa activities there is lawful.

After hearing both sides, the bench adjourned the case for further arguments, scheduling the next hearing for November 20.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.