Pay dues or lose water supply, MCC?to Ullal TMC

October 1, 2011
Mangalore, October 1: Amidst opposition from the Opposition members of Council, the Council of the Mangalore City Corporation (MCC) resolved to disconnect supply of water to Ullal TMC if they fail to pay the pending dues of Rs 1.60 crore to the MCC within seven days.


The Chief Whip said that the Ullal TMC is yet to pay a sum of Rs 1, 60, 43,500 to the MCC as on August 31. About 11 MLD water is supplied to Ullal TMC from Padil storage unit, from January 1, 2010. The MCC has supplied 32,96,200 kilo litre water to the Ullal TMC as on August end and the water bill has come up to Rs 1,70,43,500. However, the TMC had paid a sum of Rs 10 lakh to the MCC on December 28, 2010. As the Ullal TMC has failed to enter into an MoU with the MCC on the water supply, it would be considered as illegal connection.

However, the Opposition members said “disconnecting the water supply all of a sudden is not right. We should give them time to pay.”

Corporator Shanker Bhat said that the TMC should be asked to pay atleast 50 per cent of the amount within seven days. In spite of request, the TMC has failed to enter into an agreement with the MCC.


Mobile towers

Corporator Vijaykumar Shetty and Shanker Bhat asked whether the mobile service providers have to seek permission from the local bodies before installing a tower in the MCC limits, the Commissioner Dr Harish said that though the telecom rules does not direct the service providers to seek permission from the urban local bodies, with the apprehension expressed by the citizens on the towers, officials from the revenue department have been directed to issue notices to all those service providers who have failed to bring the issue of installing towers to the notice of the MCC. The officials have already issued two notices in this regard. “I have written a letter to the Deputy Commissioner to intervene and give a direction. The MCC will insist the service providers to seek permission from the MCC,” he added.

Violations

When Corporator Mariamma Thomas alleged that builders are not adhering to the conditions given to them by the Mangalore City Corporationwhile issuing building license, the MCC Commissioner said that “the Mangalore City Corporation officials will be made to certify that there was no violation when the building has reached the basement level. If there was any violation after the completion of the building, then the official who has given the certification will be held responsible.”

Streetlights

Corporators James D'Souza, Mariamma Thomas, Shanker Bhat said that streetlights are not burning in majority of the wards in the City Corporation limits. The contractor has failed in taking up maintenance work. There is a need to blacklist the contractor.

Vijaykumar Shetty said that highmast lights are not repaired. The Executive Engineer Jagadish said that estimate has been prepared for the six zones.

The government has approved the estimate for three zones. Tender will be invited shortly for the maintenance of the streetlights. The electrical materials have been purchased and will be distributed from Saturday.

The Commissioner said that he will convene a meeting of the contractor and the officials to carry out the maintenance work efficiently. He called upon the corporators to send a SMS to his mobile phone regarding the problems in their area.

Online

When the corporators said that SAS, birth and death certificate process should be made online, the Commissioner responded positively. Mayor Praveen and Deputy Mayor Geetha Nayak were present.

MC_1

MC_2

MC_3

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
September 20,2024

HCpakistanijudge.jpg

New Delhi: The Supreme Court today sought a report from the Karnataka High Court over controversial remarks made by Justice Vedavyasachar Srishananda during a recent court hearing.

Justice Srishananda, while addressing a landlord-tenant dispute, referred to a Muslim-majority area in Bengaluru as "Pakistan" and made a misogynistic comment involving a woman lawyer. 

A five-judge bench led by Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud, along with Justices S Khanna, B R Gavai, S Kant, and H Roy, expressed the need for establishing clear guidelines for constitutional court judges regarding their remarks in court. 

The Supreme Court bench said that when social media plays an active role in monitoring and amplifying courtroom proceedings, there is an urgency to ensure judicial commentary aligns with the decorum expected from courts of law.

"Our attention has been drawn to some comments made by Karnataka High Court judge Justice V Srishananda during the conduct of judicial proceedings. We have asked the AG and SG to assist us. We ask the registrar general of the High Court to submit a report to this court after seeking administrative directions from the Chief Justice of Karnataka High Court. This exercise may be carried out in 2 weeks," the top court directed.

Videos of Justice Srishanananda have gone viral on social media.

In one video, he refers to a Muslim-dominated locality in Bengaluru as "Pakistan" and on another video he was seen making objectionable comments against a woman lawyer. In the second incident, Justice Srishanananda can be heard telling the woman lawyer that she seemed to know a lot about the "opposition party", so much so that she might be able to reveal the colour of their undergarments.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
September 16,2024

Shaun.jpg

In a heart-breaking incident, 19-year-old Shaun D'Souza, a native of Vittalwadi in Udupi's Kundapur taluk, tragically lost his life in the UAE due to heat stroke.

Shaun, the beloved son of Elias Cyril D'Souza and Pramila D'Souza, originally from Hosabettu, Moodbidri, had been pursuing his college education in the UAE.

He was admitted to a hospital in Ras Al Khaimah, approximately 115 km from Dubai, after collapsing from heatstroke. Despite receiving immediate medical attention, Shaun breathed his last on Sunday, September 15. 

He is deeply mourned by his parents and two siblings. The family, who had been residing near St. Mary's Church in the UAE, are grappling with the profound loss. Shaun’s father, Elias, works as a manager for a private company, while his mother, Pramila, is an accountant.

The local community has come together to offer their support and condolences in this time of sorrow.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
September 24,2024

siddaramaiah.jpg

The Karnataka High Court on Tuesday dismissed the petition filed by Chief Minister Siddaramaiah against Governor Thawarchand Gehlot's decision to sanction the complaint and investigation against him in the alleged Mysore Urban Development Authority (MUDA) scam case.

Justice M Nagaprasanna said the facts narrated in the petition would undoubtedly require an investigation.

The court has also said that the Governor's order approving sanction to investigate against Siddaramaiah under section 17A of the Prevention of Corruption Act does not suffer from application of mind, instead has abundance of application of mind.

Meanwhile, the court rejected the request made by senior advocate Abhishek Singhvi to stay the order of the court. The court has vacated the interim order passed on August 19. In the interim order the trial court was directed not to take any precipitative action against Siddaramaiah. On August 17, Governor had approved sanction under section 17 A  of the Prevention of Corruption Act and Section 218 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita ( BNSS), citing three applications.

The court said the private complainants were justified in registering the complaint and seeking approval from the governor.

Insofar as private complainants seeking sanction under section 17A, the court said the provision nowhere requires only a police officer to seek sanction from a competent authority. The court further said it is in fact the duty of the private complainants to seek such approval.

Earlier, The High Court had completed its hearing in the case on September 12, and reserved its orders. It had also directed a special court in Bengaluru to defer further proceedings and not to take any precipitative action against the Chief Minister.

The case pertains to allegations that compensatory sites were allotted to Siddaramaiah's wife B M Parvathi in an upmarket area in Mysuru that had higher property value as compared to the location of her land that had been "acquired" by MUDA.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.