Farmers refuse to give land for Kochi-Mangalore gas pipeline

November 4, 2011

kochi


Mangalore, November 4: As many as 32 families residing in Kariangala Gram Panchayat limits (in Kariangala and Ammunje Village) unanimously proclaimed non co-operation to the proposed Kochi-Kootanad-Bangalore-Mangalore Natural Gas Pipeline Project of Gas Authority of India (GAIL), which will be passing through these villages.

During a public hearing organised by GAIL in presence of its Competent Authority, Project Assistant Commissioner Suryanarayana at Kariyangala GP premises on Thursday, the affected families said that they will not hand over their land for the cause of this project at any cost.

The villagers suggested that since the pipeline will start from Kochi Coast, let the pipeline be laid on the coastal bed instead of cutting across fertile cultivated land.

The pipeline is scheduled to be commissioned by March 2013, according to sources from GAIL. It has been designed to carry a gas volume of 16MMSCMD (Million Standard Cubic Meters per day) with a diameter of 24 inches. The pipeline will be 1.2 mts below the point of ground profile. The normal width of Right of User in the land (ROU) is 20 mts along the route of pipeline.

The villagers raising objection to the project told the Competent Authority that though the project proponents say that the land will be returned to the land owners after the pipelines are laid, they are skeptical whether the land can be used in a normal way or not. “Though this sounds like a solace, there are conditions applied because we cannot use the pipeline laid area for planting saplings and to build structures,” said a villager adding that there are several families who have just three to five cents land.

“If 20 mts are taken away from this small land holding, what will be left for the family dwelling on it,” said villager P K Mohommad who himself is facing threat of losing a part from his five cent land. He said that even if the land is returned to him, what will be the use of the land if he cannot build any structure on it.

Who is the owner?

When GAIL DGM Murali Manohar said that the land ownership will vest with the respective families themselves, villagers questioned him if at all the name of the company will appear on the land RTC or not.

When the DGM affirmed that the column 11 of the RTC will have the name of the company, the villagers were raged because with the name of the company appearing in the RTC, the ownership of the land will be shared between the family and the company. “Our hands will be tied. We cannot use the land as per our wish. We will need the permission of the company, if we want to sell the land,” said Abubakkar, a resident.

Demand quotient

When the villagers demanded to build LPG terminal at Panambur because the major consumer of the gas will be MCF, the DGM said that the pipeline will have to be taken further looking at the demand in future, retaliating his initial statement that there is adequate demand for gas in the region and in certain pockets on the route of the pipeline. When the villagers asked the DGM to shed light on the survey conducted to ascertain their demand, based on which the company decided to take this route, he had no reply.

No clearance required!

When the DGM was asked whether he had got environment clearance and clearance from Pollution Control Board for the project, he said the project does not require environment clearance and clearance from the KSPCB will be in hand soon. Raged by this, the villagers questioned the officials as to why they were causing fear among the villagers by holding such meetings, when they do not even have the mandatory and basic clearances that any project requires.


Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
September 20,2024

HCpakistanijudge.jpg

New Delhi: The Supreme Court today sought a report from the Karnataka High Court over controversial remarks made by Justice Vedavyasachar Srishananda during a recent court hearing.

Justice Srishananda, while addressing a landlord-tenant dispute, referred to a Muslim-majority area in Bengaluru as "Pakistan" and made a misogynistic comment involving a woman lawyer. 

A five-judge bench led by Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud, along with Justices S Khanna, B R Gavai, S Kant, and H Roy, expressed the need for establishing clear guidelines for constitutional court judges regarding their remarks in court. 

The Supreme Court bench said that when social media plays an active role in monitoring and amplifying courtroom proceedings, there is an urgency to ensure judicial commentary aligns with the decorum expected from courts of law.

"Our attention has been drawn to some comments made by Karnataka High Court judge Justice V Srishananda during the conduct of judicial proceedings. We have asked the AG and SG to assist us. We ask the registrar general of the High Court to submit a report to this court after seeking administrative directions from the Chief Justice of Karnataka High Court. This exercise may be carried out in 2 weeks," the top court directed.

Videos of Justice Srishanananda have gone viral on social media.

In one video, he refers to a Muslim-dominated locality in Bengaluru as "Pakistan" and on another video he was seen making objectionable comments against a woman lawyer. In the second incident, Justice Srishanananda can be heard telling the woman lawyer that she seemed to know a lot about the "opposition party", so much so that she might be able to reveal the colour of their undergarments.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
September 20,2024

Udupi: A vigilant Railway Protection Force (RPF) constable, Aparna K T, demonstrated remarkable presence of mind when she rescued a student who slipped while trying to board a moving train at Udupi Railway Station on Friday morning.

The incident occurred as passenger train number 06602 arrived at the station around 7:30 AM. The student, traveling from Mangaluru to Gokarna, had briefly alighted to purchase snacks. However, as the train began moving, she hurried back towards the carriage with the snacks in hand. In her rush, she lost her footing, slipping dangerously between the platform and the moving train.

udupitrain.jpg
Woman constable Aparna K T was given a cash reward of Rs 5000.

 

Constable Aparna, who had been closely monitoring the passengers, immediately sprang into action. “I saw her running towards the train and alerted everyone by blowing my whistle. She slipped, and her legs were caught between the platform and the train. Without hesitation, I pulled her out with the help of others nearby,” she recalled.

Thanks to Aparna’s quick thinking and the swift response of the railway staff, the train was stopped in time. Railway personnel, including the guard and loco pilot, were immediately informed, and they acted promptly to halt the train using both flag signals and a walkie-talkie.

RPF Inspector Madhusoodhanan PV arrived at the scene shortly after to check on the passenger's condition. The shaken but uninjured student was given water and helped back onto the train to safely continue her journey.

In an added measure of care, the RPF post at Bhatkal was notified to follow up on the passenger’s well-being during her journey. The student, fortunately, reached her destination without further incident.

The heroic rescue was captured on CCTV and has since gone viral on social media, earning widespread praise. In recognition of her bravery, Regional Railway Manager (RRM) Karwar awarded Constable Aparna a cash reward of ₹5,000, commending her quick action that averted a potentially tragic accident.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.