Cong corporators protest road widening aimed at benefitting a college linked to a Minister

January 28, 2012

Mangalore, January 28: Congress corporators staged a vociferous protest at a meeting of the Mangalore City Corporation Council here on Friday against the move aimed at benefitting a college linked to a Minister by scuttling a proposal to widen a road.

The issue revolves around the Vikas College of Physiotherapy at Mary Hill which is run by Vikas Education Trust. The college website says that District in-charge Minister J. Krishna Palemar is a member of the trust's governing council.

The councillors did not name the Minister but said that there was a move to ensure that a road passing by the college was not widened contrary to what was envisioned in the revised Master Plan for the city's development for 10 years. The width envisaged is 80 ft.

They said a resolution had been passed by the Mangalore Urban Development Authority (MUDA) to retain the road at its current width. A copy of the resolution circulated to the media, put the current width of the road from Mary Hill to Padavinangady at 6.5 m (21 ft) to 9 m (30 ft). It said a request for retaining the width came from the president of the trust.

Congress councillor Deepak Pujary, who raised the issue, alleged that it was a conspiracy to benefit someone. Councillor Shashidhar Hegde of the Congress said this showed that MUDA favoured the rich builders and described the move as meaningless and condemnable. Councillor Mariamma Thomas said MUDA acted in a whimsical manner.

Councillors from the ruling BJP defended the MUDA action saying there was no need for an 80-foot wide road near the college.

There was another 80-foot road on the other side of the college, they said.

The Congress councillors staged a protest seeking an answer to the issue. Subsequently, the Mayor adjourned the meeting. MUDA official G. Venugopal said the issue had not come to his notice.

However, the resolution would be brought to the notice of people through newspaper advertisements and objections would be considered before its implementation, he added.

Mr. Palemar told The Hindu that he or the college had nothing to lose if the road was widened. He would allow widening of the road if he was convinced that there was a need to widen it. With the MUDA resolution, an aberration was being corrected, he said.

There were only a few houses along the road and there was no need for an 80-foot road, he said.

Later, the corporation council resolved to rename the circle in front Circuit House as “Parashuram Circle.”

It passed a resolution backing the Mayor's action of granting permission to a proposal to supply 18 million litres of water per day to Mangalore Chemicals and Fertilisers and Udupi Power Corporation (Panambur Unit), among others. It referred a matter regarding renaming the Clock Tower Circle as Swami Vivekananda Circle to a standing committee.

MCC__1

MCC__2

MCC__3

MCC__4

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
September 25,2024

siddru.jpg

In a significant development, a special court tasked with handling cases against Members of Parliament and Members of Legislative Assemblies (MP/MLAs) has ordered that a First Information Report (FIR) be filed regarding the Muda case.

Additionally, the Karnataka Lokayukta, which is an anti-corruption body, has been tasked with investigating allegations against Siddaramaiah, who is reportedly involved in the case.

The court instructed the Lokayukta (an anti-corruption authority) to provide a report within three months. It also ordered the relevant authorities to file a First Information Report (FIR) regarding the case.

Judge Santhosh Gajanan Bhat issued the directive, compelling the Mysuru Lokayukta police to commence an investigation following a formal complaint lodged by Snehamayi Krishna. 

The Karnataka Lokayukta in Mysuru is required to carry out the investigation under Section 156 (3) of the Criminal Procedure Code, which mandates the registration of a First Information Report (FIR).

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
September 19,2024

Muniratna.jpg

Ramanagara, Sep 19: A case of rape, sexual harassment and criminal intimidation has been registered against BJP MLA Munirathna and six others, police said on Thursday.

It was registered following the complaint of a 40-year-old woman who alleged that the incident took place at a private resort within the Kaggalipura police station’s jurisdiction.

“We received a complaint on Wednesday night and based on it, we have registered case against seven people, including the BJP MLA under various sections for rape by public servant, sexual harassment, criminal intimidation, criminal conspiracy, voyeurism, intentional insult with intent to provoke breach of peace, Information Technology Act, and others,” a senior police officer said.

The matter is being investigated, he said.

The fresh FIR against the BJP MLA, also a former Minister, comes days after he was arrested by the Bengaluru Police in connection with the two cases filed against him for alleged harassment, threats and casteist abuse, police said.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
September 20,2024

HCpakistanijudge.jpg

New Delhi: The Supreme Court today sought a report from the Karnataka High Court over controversial remarks made by Justice Vedavyasachar Srishananda during a recent court hearing.

Justice Srishananda, while addressing a landlord-tenant dispute, referred to a Muslim-majority area in Bengaluru as "Pakistan" and made a misogynistic comment involving a woman lawyer. 

A five-judge bench led by Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud, along with Justices S Khanna, B R Gavai, S Kant, and H Roy, expressed the need for establishing clear guidelines for constitutional court judges regarding their remarks in court. 

The Supreme Court bench said that when social media plays an active role in monitoring and amplifying courtroom proceedings, there is an urgency to ensure judicial commentary aligns with the decorum expected from courts of law.

"Our attention has been drawn to some comments made by Karnataka High Court judge Justice V Srishananda during the conduct of judicial proceedings. We have asked the AG and SG to assist us. We ask the registrar general of the High Court to submit a report to this court after seeking administrative directions from the Chief Justice of Karnataka High Court. This exercise may be carried out in 2 weeks," the top court directed.

Videos of Justice Srishanananda have gone viral on social media.

In one video, he refers to a Muslim-dominated locality in Bengaluru as "Pakistan" and on another video he was seen making objectionable comments against a woman lawyer. In the second incident, Justice Srishanananda can be heard telling the woman lawyer that she seemed to know a lot about the "opposition party", so much so that she might be able to reveal the colour of their undergarments.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.