Tug-of-war for 'Byari' glory: Sara Aboobaker hits out at producer

[email protected] (CD Network)
March 9, 2012
Mangalore, March 9: The controversy surrounding the authorship of the story of 'Byari' has surfaced again with noted Kannada writer Sara Aboobaker reiterating her claim that the National Award winning movie was based on her first book Chandragiri Thiradalli released in mid-80s.

The first-ever Beary film with the same title, shared the Best Feature Film award along with Marathi film Deol when the names were announced on Wednesday in New Delhi.

The film, produced by Mangalore-based producer Altaf Hussain Chokkabettu, was released in June last year with the director himself playing the lead male character.

sara

Sara, who had raised her objections during and before the release of the movie, once again reiterated her stand that the movie was based on her successful novel, which narrated the plight of a young Muslim woman who 's life was shattered by the misuse of provisions of Talaq in Islam.

“Altaf Hussain Chokkabettu, the producer of the movie had asked her for the rights of the book. “I had already signed a agreement until 2015 with the National Film Development Corporation that I would not give the story to any visual media,” she told coastaldigest.com

Despite her telling the producer of Byari that he could not use the story, in Kerala, he had declared that his film was based on her book. “He even put up posters in Mangalore saying that the story was mine,” she said. “But when I raised objections he backtracked and, claimed that the story was written by Irfan Chokabettu”.

Sara, has in fact, approached court seeking justice, but had to withdraw since she was 'disillusioned' with the legal system of the country.

“Today lawyers don't take up cases on the basis of who's right or who's wrong. They want to ascertain how influential or financially sound the other party is before taking up one's case. Even otherwise, the judicial process is riddled with inordinate delays. At 75, I was not prepared for the long haul,” says Sara.

“I still have the clippings of his (Altaf) statements published in Malayalam newspapers. I also have a poster of the movie which has my name on it. I had produced them before the court. The court had asked the defendant to produce the book supposedly written by Irfan Chokkabettu,” she said, but insisted she had withdrawn the case since she was not sure of getting justice.

When asked about the marked difference in the climax of her novel and that of the movie, she said: “When you adopt a book to the visual media, you make certain changes. It has happened with all the great works of Kannada literature. It cannot be a mere coincidence that the names of characters of the movie and that of my book are same.”

Sara is also unhappy that fellow-writers did not come out in the open to support her fight against what she called an act of blatant plagiarism. “Of course I am pained by the marked silence of my fellow writers. They should have come out in the open to fight against the injustice. Even in the Karnataka Film Chamber, except Jayamala, no one took up my cause. If this had happened in United States or some other country, people would have reacted strongly,” she says.

When asked how she felt about a debut Beary film getting a top national award, she said: “Awards are not a big thing. The movie was about one of the worst practices in our religion. The portrayal of the evil practice will definitely fetch awards. I won the award for the best story for the same novel when it was made a film in Tamil. So it was quiet expected. And you know how the awards are decided these days. Lot of lobbying and behind-the-scene maneuvering goes into it.”

Reacting to a question if she was feeling betrayed that she had been denied the credit, Mrs. Sara said: “No, not at all. I have already secured awards and accolades for my work. My books have been made the textbook in some universities. I have been bestowed honorary doctorate by three universities in Karnataka. I am saddened by the way he (Altaf) cheated me and went on to claim that he did not even know me.”

altaf

On the other hand producer Altaf Hussain refuted her claim and said the film was based on Quran and not on anyone's book.

“Just because the names of the characters are same, she cannot claim that the movie is based on her book. The movie has been created based on a real-life event. Our movie does not violate the tenets of Islam, while her book questions the Islamic customs,” he argues.

Altaf reiterated that he did not know Sara Aboobaker until the controversy broke out. “I did not know who this woman was. When I set out on the movie-making mission, I would have naturally spoken to writers in the Beary community. There are eminent writers like Boluvaru, Fakir Mohammed Katpad, Baddur who are well-versed in Beary culture and language. Sara Aboobaker does not belong to beary community. She is a Malayali. Their culture and our culture are different. So, I would not have met her even to get her advice,” he says.

Insisting that he had never spoken to the media in Trissur International Film Festival, nor printed any publicity material with her name on it, Altaf says, “the publicity material submitted by her (Sara) to the court is two years old. But we prepared the first poster only after we got the censor certificate from the concerned authorities. The movie was released in Mangalore on June 9. The only press meet we held in connection with the movie was in Mangalore on June 3.”

When asked if Irfan Chokkabettu's work has been published in the print media, he said: “Irfan is a talented writer. He has got a number of stories with him which are not published anywhere.”

Reacting sharply to Sara's criticism of plagiarism, Altaf said: “It is foolish to say that she withdrew her case because lawyers cheated her. The advancing age is clearily showing in her statements. Now that the film has won national award, she has started to blackmail us once again. But this will not succeed.”




Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
September 28,2024

muni.jpg

Bengaluru, Sep 28: The Special Investigation Team (SIT) probing charges against arrested Karnataka BJP MLA N. Munirathna Naidu, including allegations of rape, honey-trapping, and other offences, on Saturday conducted raids at his residence and 15 other locations across the city.

Sources confirmed that the raids were taking place at his Vyalikaval residence and other properties owned by the BJP MLA. The operation is being conducted by the SIT under the Criminal Investigation Department (CID) led by ACP Kavitha.

The team is examining documents, electronic devices, and other materials related to the rape and honey-trapping case. The SIT is being supported by experts from the Forensic Science Laboratory (FSL), with Superintendent of Police (SP) Sowmya Latha also participating in the search and inspection at Munirathna’s Vyalikaval residence.

According to sources, the raids were triggered by information provided by the victim, who alleged that Munirathna recorded footage of sexual assaults and used it to blackmail politicians and public servants, including IAS and IPS officers.

The victim reportedly revealed that she was used to entrap the woman who had lodged a rape case against a senior IFS officer. She was allegedly instructed to frame the rape victim in a drug peddling case.

The complainant told police that she was tasked with capturing compromising videos of the rape victim who had filed the case against the IFS officer. She claimed that, after several failed attempts to obtain the videos, the victim was drugged with sleeping pills, and obscene footage was recorded without her consent. Later, the IFS officer was bailed out from the charges.

Furthermore, the complainant has accused MLA Munirathna of raping her at his office within the state legislature, in his official vehicle, and at his godown. She has alleged that he recorded videos of these assaults.

Police sources also revealed that the victim in the MLA's case provided details of a plot involving sending HIV-infected women to Munirathna's targets in an attempt to ruin them politically and personally. She also disclosed the names of several politicians whom she had entrapped through honey-trapping.

The woman further claimed that Munirathna had threatened to have her son kidnapped and killed if she refused to comply with his demands. According to her, the MLA had a well-organised team dedicated to carrying out these honey-trapping operations, and she provided details about his close associates and relatives involved in the scheme.

Munirathna, who was in judicial custody following his arrest in the rape and honey-trap case, has now been taken into the custody of the SIT.

The MLA was transferred from Bengaluru Central Jail to the CID office on the night of September 24. The BJP legislator, however, has denied all the allegations, claiming they are false.

Karnataka Congress leader D.K. Suresh had alleged that Munirathna was trying to infect his adversaries with HIV and that the government should investigate the matter.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
September 24,2024

siddaramaiah.jpg

The Karnataka High Court on Tuesday dismissed the petition filed by Chief Minister Siddaramaiah against Governor Thawarchand Gehlot's decision to sanction the complaint and investigation against him in the alleged Mysore Urban Development Authority (MUDA) scam case.

Justice M Nagaprasanna said the facts narrated in the petition would undoubtedly require an investigation.

The court has also said that the Governor's order approving sanction to investigate against Siddaramaiah under section 17A of the Prevention of Corruption Act does not suffer from application of mind, instead has abundance of application of mind.

Meanwhile, the court rejected the request made by senior advocate Abhishek Singhvi to stay the order of the court. The court has vacated the interim order passed on August 19. In the interim order the trial court was directed not to take any precipitative action against Siddaramaiah. On August 17, Governor had approved sanction under section 17 A  of the Prevention of Corruption Act and Section 218 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita ( BNSS), citing three applications.

The court said the private complainants were justified in registering the complaint and seeking approval from the governor.

Insofar as private complainants seeking sanction under section 17A, the court said the provision nowhere requires only a police officer to seek sanction from a competent authority. The court further said it is in fact the duty of the private complainants to seek such approval.

Earlier, The High Court had completed its hearing in the case on September 12, and reserved its orders. It had also directed a special court in Bengaluru to defer further proceedings and not to take any precipitative action against the Chief Minister.

The case pertains to allegations that compensatory sites were allotted to Siddaramaiah's wife B M Parvathi in an upmarket area in Mysuru that had higher property value as compared to the location of her land that had been "acquired" by MUDA.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
September 25,2024

siddru.jpg

In a significant development, a special court tasked with handling cases against Members of Parliament and Members of Legislative Assemblies (MP/MLAs) has ordered that a First Information Report (FIR) be filed regarding the Muda case.

Additionally, the Karnataka Lokayukta, which is an anti-corruption body, has been tasked with investigating allegations against Siddaramaiah, who is reportedly involved in the case.

The court instructed the Lokayukta (an anti-corruption authority) to provide a report within three months. It also ordered the relevant authorities to file a First Information Report (FIR) regarding the case.

Judge Santhosh Gajanan Bhat issued the directive, compelling the Mysuru Lokayukta police to commence an investigation following a formal complaint lodged by Snehamayi Krishna. 

The Karnataka Lokayukta in Mysuru is required to carry out the investigation under Section 156 (3) of the Criminal Procedure Code, which mandates the registration of a First Information Report (FIR).

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.