BJP objects to Mayor's budget presentation in Council Meet

March 31, 2012

MCC9

Mangalore, March 31: Arguments between Corporators of BJP and Congress on the issue of Mayor's budget presentation largely dominated the Council Meet at the MCC on Saturday.

Shankar Bhat, Former Mayor and BJP Corporator questioned Mayor Gulzar Banu's right to present the budget and make changes to the proposed budget such as increasing the amount of 'Kuteera Bhagya' scheme to Rs 25,000 from the proposed Rs 15,000 without referring it to the finance standing committee. He also remarked that until the High Court passes its judgment on the case of faulty Mayoral election procedure which is scheduled for April 3, Ms. Banu should not be conducting Council proceedings as Mayor.

Congress corporator Shashidhar Hegde in defense of the Mayor said that since there was one-third majority present in the House in spite of the BJP corporators staging a walkout, the session was continued. They insisted that Shantha of BJP had been asked by the Mayor to present the budget which she did not.

Raising objections to the Mayor's passing of the budget without referring to the standing committee, Ms. Shantha herself, Premananda Shetty, Sudhir Shetty and other BJP Corporators questioned the Mayor's action and demanded an explanation from Dr. K Harish Kumar, Commissioner, MCC. On the other hand, Congress Corporator DK Ashok Kumar also sought an explanation from the Commissioner as to who according to the law book must present the budget in case the finance committee chief is not present.

Mr. Kumar quoting from the law books said that there is no specific mention of who is to bear the responsibility of presenting the budget in case the standing committee chief is not there. “In such matters we have to seek directions from the Court of Law. But the norm and the law is that the budget has to be presented by the chief of the finance standing committee and for changes to be made, it has to be referred to the standing committee”. However, the Commissioner added that the financial year had come to an end and it was mandatory for the Corporation to forward the budget to the state government for its approval.

Congress corporators took a dig at their BJP counterparts for being absent for finance standing committee chief's election meetings and delaying the proceedings. The BJP corporators on the other hand argued that all their party corporators who were in the standing committee had sought permission for absence and hence their absence could not be questioned.

Towards the latter part of the session, the focus shifted to city's water problem. Corporators of various wards expressed water woes of their respective areas. Responding to some of the queries on the lack of water supply and dip in water level at Thumbay dam raised by corporators, the Commissioner said that since it had not rained beyond November this season and that there was no rain in the catchment areas this summer along with greater evaporation, the river inflow has reduced. Water supply to industries and construction projects has been cut off and frequency of water supply to Mulky and Ullal has also been reduced, he said. River inflow is virtually zero, he added and said that supplying water to higher areas in desired pressure is a problem that the Corporation is trying to address.

MCC1

MCC2

MCC3

MCC4

MCC5

MCC6

MCC7

MCC8

MCC10

MCC11

MCC12

MCC13

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
September 24,2024

siddaramaiah.jpg

The Karnataka High Court on Tuesday dismissed the petition filed by Chief Minister Siddaramaiah against Governor Thawarchand Gehlot's decision to sanction the complaint and investigation against him in the alleged Mysore Urban Development Authority (MUDA) scam case.

Justice M Nagaprasanna said the facts narrated in the petition would undoubtedly require an investigation.

The court has also said that the Governor's order approving sanction to investigate against Siddaramaiah under section 17A of the Prevention of Corruption Act does not suffer from application of mind, instead has abundance of application of mind.

Meanwhile, the court rejected the request made by senior advocate Abhishek Singhvi to stay the order of the court. The court has vacated the interim order passed on August 19. In the interim order the trial court was directed not to take any precipitative action against Siddaramaiah. On August 17, Governor had approved sanction under section 17 A  of the Prevention of Corruption Act and Section 218 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita ( BNSS), citing three applications.

The court said the private complainants were justified in registering the complaint and seeking approval from the governor.

Insofar as private complainants seeking sanction under section 17A, the court said the provision nowhere requires only a police officer to seek sanction from a competent authority. The court further said it is in fact the duty of the private complainants to seek such approval.

Earlier, The High Court had completed its hearing in the case on September 12, and reserved its orders. It had also directed a special court in Bengaluru to defer further proceedings and not to take any precipitative action against the Chief Minister.

The case pertains to allegations that compensatory sites were allotted to Siddaramaiah's wife B M Parvathi in an upmarket area in Mysuru that had higher property value as compared to the location of her land that had been "acquired" by MUDA.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
September 20,2024

HCpakistanijudge.jpg

New Delhi: The Supreme Court today sought a report from the Karnataka High Court over controversial remarks made by Justice Vedavyasachar Srishananda during a recent court hearing.

Justice Srishananda, while addressing a landlord-tenant dispute, referred to a Muslim-majority area in Bengaluru as "Pakistan" and made a misogynistic comment involving a woman lawyer. 

A five-judge bench led by Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud, along with Justices S Khanna, B R Gavai, S Kant, and H Roy, expressed the need for establishing clear guidelines for constitutional court judges regarding their remarks in court. 

The Supreme Court bench said that when social media plays an active role in monitoring and amplifying courtroom proceedings, there is an urgency to ensure judicial commentary aligns with the decorum expected from courts of law.

"Our attention has been drawn to some comments made by Karnataka High Court judge Justice V Srishananda during the conduct of judicial proceedings. We have asked the AG and SG to assist us. We ask the registrar general of the High Court to submit a report to this court after seeking administrative directions from the Chief Justice of Karnataka High Court. This exercise may be carried out in 2 weeks," the top court directed.

Videos of Justice Srishanananda have gone viral on social media.

In one video, he refers to a Muslim-dominated locality in Bengaluru as "Pakistan" and on another video he was seen making objectionable comments against a woman lawyer. In the second incident, Justice Srishanananda can be heard telling the woman lawyer that she seemed to know a lot about the "opposition party", so much so that she might be able to reveal the colour of their undergarments.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
September 16,2024

Shaun.jpg

In a heart-breaking incident, 19-year-old Shaun D'Souza, a native of Vittalwadi in Udupi's Kundapur taluk, tragically lost his life in the UAE due to heat stroke.

Shaun, the beloved son of Elias Cyril D'Souza and Pramila D'Souza, originally from Hosabettu, Moodbidri, had been pursuing his college education in the UAE.

He was admitted to a hospital in Ras Al Khaimah, approximately 115 km from Dubai, after collapsing from heatstroke. Despite receiving immediate medical attention, Shaun breathed his last on Sunday, September 15. 

He is deeply mourned by his parents and two siblings. The family, who had been residing near St. Mary's Church in the UAE, are grappling with the profound loss. Shaun’s father, Elias, works as a manager for a private company, while his mother, Pramila, is an accountant.

The local community has come together to offer their support and condolences in this time of sorrow.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.