Seer plays key role in resolving Upendra film stalemate

[email protected] (The Hindu)
May 15, 2012
katari

Udupi, May 15: The producer of the controversial Kannada film Katari Veera Surasundarangi , Muniratna, said here on Monday that the film would be released again on Friday (May 18) after editing some scenes and dialogues considered objectionable to Hindu activists.

Mr. Muniratna and actor of the film, Upendra, met Lakshmivara Tirtha Swami of Shiroor Mutt and held consultations over the release of the film.

The Shiroor seer and activists belonging to the Bajrang Dal had stopped the screening of the film at the Gitanjali cinema here in Udupi on May 12, protesting against some scenes and dialogues, which they said were objectionable to Hindu religion. There were protests against the film in other parts of the State also.

Speaking to mediapersons here, Mr. Muniratna said at the meeting with the Shiroor seer held on Monday, it was decided to remove the objectionable content. The film would do well after the necessary editing was done, he added. Mr. Upendra recalled his 15-year-long association with the Shiroor seer. He had visited the seer during his last Paryaya in 1994-95 and the seer had blessed him. This had helped his film Om become a box office success. All differences with regard to Katari Veera Surasundarangi were resolved, he said. With the blessings of Lord Krishna and the seer, this film too would be successful.

Mr. Upendra pointed out the difficulties involved in producing a 3D film. Mr. Muniratna had not only produced the film in 3D, but many theatre owners had cooperated by making requisite changes to screen the 3D film in their theatres.

The Shiroor Math seer said that Mr. Upendra had offered 'Tappu Kanike' (money offered to seek forgiveness) to Lord Krishna and Lord Hanuman at the 'Kanakana Kindi' at Sri Krishna Math for the objectionable scenes in the film.

“Let this film be successful. I too will try to see the film,” he said.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
September 24,2024

siddaramaiah.jpg

The Karnataka High Court on Tuesday dismissed the petition filed by Chief Minister Siddaramaiah against Governor Thawarchand Gehlot's decision to sanction the complaint and investigation against him in the alleged Mysore Urban Development Authority (MUDA) scam case.

Justice M Nagaprasanna said the facts narrated in the petition would undoubtedly require an investigation.

The court has also said that the Governor's order approving sanction to investigate against Siddaramaiah under section 17A of the Prevention of Corruption Act does not suffer from application of mind, instead has abundance of application of mind.

Meanwhile, the court rejected the request made by senior advocate Abhishek Singhvi to stay the order of the court. The court has vacated the interim order passed on August 19. In the interim order the trial court was directed not to take any precipitative action against Siddaramaiah. On August 17, Governor had approved sanction under section 17 A  of the Prevention of Corruption Act and Section 218 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita ( BNSS), citing three applications.

The court said the private complainants were justified in registering the complaint and seeking approval from the governor.

Insofar as private complainants seeking sanction under section 17A, the court said the provision nowhere requires only a police officer to seek sanction from a competent authority. The court further said it is in fact the duty of the private complainants to seek such approval.

Earlier, The High Court had completed its hearing in the case on September 12, and reserved its orders. It had also directed a special court in Bengaluru to defer further proceedings and not to take any precipitative action against the Chief Minister.

The case pertains to allegations that compensatory sites were allotted to Siddaramaiah's wife B M Parvathi in an upmarket area in Mysuru that had higher property value as compared to the location of her land that had been "acquired" by MUDA.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
September 25,2024

siddru.jpg

In a significant development, a special court tasked with handling cases against Members of Parliament and Members of Legislative Assemblies (MP/MLAs) has ordered that a First Information Report (FIR) be filed regarding the Muda case.

Additionally, the Karnataka Lokayukta, which is an anti-corruption body, has been tasked with investigating allegations against Siddaramaiah, who is reportedly involved in the case.

The court instructed the Lokayukta (an anti-corruption authority) to provide a report within three months. It also ordered the relevant authorities to file a First Information Report (FIR) regarding the case.

Judge Santhosh Gajanan Bhat issued the directive, compelling the Mysuru Lokayukta police to commence an investigation following a formal complaint lodged by Snehamayi Krishna. 

The Karnataka Lokayukta in Mysuru is required to carry out the investigation under Section 156 (3) of the Criminal Procedure Code, which mandates the registration of a First Information Report (FIR).

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.