Six Gulf hospitals say 'no' to Mangalore-based pregnant woman; new born baby dies

[email protected] (News Network)
November 19, 2012
baby_19112012

 

Dubai, November 20: A Mangalore-based 27-week pregnant woman with premature labour pains was allegedly refused treatment by at least six private and government hospitals across three emirates last week.

 

Nearly all hospitals, she has claimed, said they did not have bed space.

 

The seventh hospital also initially refused the Indian woman, but took her in after realising that she would deliver within minutes.

 

However, her premature baby boy died two days after birth due to bleeding in the lungs, reports show. Doctors from the Iranian Hospital told the woman that her baby could have survived if she had arrived at the hospital earlier, she said.

 

When 34-year-old Pushpa K Joy finally gave birth at 10pm on November 8, she had been shuttling between hospitals in heavy traffic, bearing severe birthing pains for over 10 hours. The hospitals also refused to provide an ambulance, she has alleged.

 

A week after the death of the child they had been wanting for long, the distraught couple says they are seeking answers. They have questioned the medical ethics and doctors' responsibilities.

 

Dr Abdullah Khayat from Latifa Hospital in Dubai, Dr Arif Nouryani from Al Qasimi Hospital in Sharjah and Dr Obaid Al Khudaim from Baraha Hospital in Dubai said Pushpa may have been turned away because currently they are all overbooked by 100 per cent. She had not pre-registered with them, they added.

 

“I had been attending pre-natals at Dr Sunny's Clinic in Sharjah and was told that everything is normal,” said Pushpa, adding that her doctor told her she would be referred to a nearby hospital after she completed her seventh month for delivery, since the clinic does not have an inpatient facility. Nothing was said about registering ahead of time, she said.

 

“On November 7, I started feeling some pain and went to see my doctor at the clinic. I was administered an injection and advised complete bed rest,” she said.

 

The next day at around 2pm, when Pushpa's pains got worse she was asked to visit Gulf Medical University (GMU) in Ajman by her doctor with a letter explaining her condition.

 

Pushpa, also mother to an eight-year-old daughter, claims the doctor stopped responding to her calls when she could not find a place in any hospital.

 

A statement from Dr Sunny's Clinic read: “In a polyclinic setup, a gynaecologist usually takes care of the patient for the first two trimesters of pregnancy (antenatal). Pushpa was not a high-risk patient in the beginning, but after her fifth month, she developed slight fluid increase (amniotic fluid on upper normal level). She was advised to register at a government hospital/private hospital of her choice. The doctor in question also attended all the calls on November 8. Ironically, the doctor herself contacted the relative of the patient who accompanied her to check on her status that too after duty hours.”

 

Pushpa also claimed that after a check-up, GMU said they did have not space and told her to visit Al Qasimi Hospital in Sharjah. In a statement, GMU said: “As per the medical records of GMU Hospital, Ajman, no patient in the name of Pushpa K Joy has reported to the hospital for any sort of consultation/treatment/delivery on the said date.”

 

“From Al Qasimi I was sent to Al Baraha in Dubai because they too said they did not have space,” she claimed. Pushpa, who works as a school nurse in Sharjah, alleged that all these hospitals had done her check-ups before turning her away and knew that she was having contractions.

 

“From Baraha, we went to NMC Specialty in Dubai but were told that rules did not allow them to admit a patient who has not completed 30 weeks of pregnancy.” In a detailed statement, NMC Specialty Hospital said when the patient visited them on November 8 she was 27 weeks pregnant, in early labour and in stable condition.

 

“It was suggested that she visit the government hospital to ensure safe delivery of her baby, as the baby was very premature and our hospital was not privileged to treat babies below 30 weeks gestation. When she left NMC, she was not in a state of medical emergency and was stable,” it read.

 

By this time, Pushpa had ''dilated six and half centimetres and was almost ready to give birth''.

 

Being driven by her brother James Korah, Pushpa was then taken to Iranian Hospital that initially also refused but upon seeing her condition and on the personal responsibility of a doctor, admitted her.

 

According to reports issued by Iranian Hospital and obtained by Khaleej Times, Pushpa delivered just 10 minutes after she reached. Her baby could not survive.

 

James said the ordeal was a “horrific incident”.

 

“What kind of law is above a human's life? What is a doctor's responsibility?”

 

Jojo, Pushpa's husband said he wants women to be prepared for premature childbirth and not undergo what his wife has had to. “I could have lost my wife ... someone should have taken a call and realised that a human life was at stake.”


Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
October 1,2024

lokayukta.jpg

Mysuru, Oct 1: The Karnataka Lokayukta team on Tuesday arrived at the disputed plot in Mysuru and began investigation into the MUDA case against CM Siddaramaiah and his wife, news agency ANI reported. Snehamayi Krishna, the complainant in the case was also present with the team.

Sources stated that ED sleuths might issue a notice to CM Siddaramaiah at any time and issue summons to him for questioning. The sleuths are also keenly watching the movements of CM Siddaramaiah’s close associates and relatives, including a cabinet minister in connection with the MUDA scam.

Sources further said that there is a possibility of the ED conducting raids across the state on offices and residences of close associates of CM Siddaramaiah. The ED has also gathered information on bank accounts and financial transactions of CM Siddaramaiah and his associates.

The Directorate of Enforcement (ED) on Monday registered an Enforcement Case Information Report (ECIR), equivalent to an FIR by the police, against CM Siddaramaiah over the alleged irregularities in the allotment of 14 sites to his wife Parvathi B.M. by the Mysore Urban Development Authority. The ED registered the case taking cognisance of the FIR registered against the Chief Minister by the Lokayukta police on September 27.

Meanwhile, the Karnataka Lokayukta probing the MUDA case has also expedited the probe. The sleuths led by Mysuru Lokayukta SP T.J. Udesh have visited the controversial land on the outskirts of Mysuru city. The petitioner, Snehamayi Krishna, also accompanied the team.

The move of Chief Minister Siddaramaiah’s wife to return 14 sites allotted by the MUDA to her has triggered a debate. BJP MLA from Mysuru T.S. Srivatsa stated on Tuesday that the move of CM’s wife is not acceptable. "The two commissioners who colluded in the MUDA scam are roaming freely even today," he said.

"CM Siddaramaiah first claimed that there was no scam at all. Later, he formed a commission and now there is an FIR against him. After committing the mistake, you offer to return the sale deed. The time is up. He will have to tender his resignation and I am sure he won’t be in the position until Dasara festivities," MLA T.S. Srivatsa stated.

T.J. Abraham, one of the petitioners in the MUDA case said, “I had demanded the MUDA commissioner to take back the allotted sites. He had written back saying the process would be initiated. They were waiting for the investigation report."

"CM Siddaramaiah has not approached the division bench or the Supreme Court to challenge the order against him because there is nothing to be challenged. Returning sites is not a big sacrifice. The Chief Minister has lost it," Abraham stated. 
 

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
September 24,2024

siddaramaiah.jpg

The Karnataka High Court on Tuesday dismissed the petition filed by Chief Minister Siddaramaiah against Governor Thawarchand Gehlot's decision to sanction the complaint and investigation against him in the alleged Mysore Urban Development Authority (MUDA) scam case.

Justice M Nagaprasanna said the facts narrated in the petition would undoubtedly require an investigation.

The court has also said that the Governor's order approving sanction to investigate against Siddaramaiah under section 17A of the Prevention of Corruption Act does not suffer from application of mind, instead has abundance of application of mind.

Meanwhile, the court rejected the request made by senior advocate Abhishek Singhvi to stay the order of the court. The court has vacated the interim order passed on August 19. In the interim order the trial court was directed not to take any precipitative action against Siddaramaiah. On August 17, Governor had approved sanction under section 17 A  of the Prevention of Corruption Act and Section 218 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita ( BNSS), citing three applications.

The court said the private complainants were justified in registering the complaint and seeking approval from the governor.

Insofar as private complainants seeking sanction under section 17A, the court said the provision nowhere requires only a police officer to seek sanction from a competent authority. The court further said it is in fact the duty of the private complainants to seek such approval.

Earlier, The High Court had completed its hearing in the case on September 12, and reserved its orders. It had also directed a special court in Bengaluru to defer further proceedings and not to take any precipitative action against the Chief Minister.

The case pertains to allegations that compensatory sites were allotted to Siddaramaiah's wife B M Parvathi in an upmarket area in Mysuru that had higher property value as compared to the location of her land that had been "acquired" by MUDA.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.