Plastic ban includes polypropylene bags, clarifies Commissioner at MCC meet

[email protected] (CD Network)
November 30, 2012

mcc2_copy

Mangalore, November 30: The polypropylene bags which look like cloth bags are also covered under the plastic ban implemented in the city, Dr. Harish Kumar, Commissioner, Mangalore City Corporation (MCC) said.

He gave this clarification at the monthly meeting held at MCC on Friday.

Corporators including Former Mayor Shankar Bhat, Deepak Poojary and Harinath raised the issue of the polypropylene bags being used in the city and argued that lab reports have proved that these bags too are polymer products and must also be banned besides the conventional plastic carry bags and urged concerned officials to not target people over the use of the latter type alone. Dr. Kumar, in response, clarified that the ban enforced on plastic also encompasses such semi-plastic materials. “It is a wrong notion that the MCC is encouraging these bags. They too come under the ban”, he said.

Corporator Sudhir Shetty said that plastic in the form of soft drink bottles, milk packets and water bottles must also be brought under the ban. Mr. Harinath pressed for an alternate arrangement for people to carry meat and fish.

Another corporator raised the issue of certain officials using the plastic ban pretext to harass shopkeepers and obtain bribes.

Corporator Mariyamma Thomas, expressing her views, said that the Deputy Commissioner should not have taken the decision of banning plastic in the city before allowing the City Corporation Council to decide on it first after judging the pros and cons of the matter.

Jayanthi B Shetty, another Corporator, said that the plastic manufacturing plants must be targeted rather than harassing shopkeepers and the common man.

When the issue of the scheduled door to door collection of garbage came up, the Commissioner said in response to a query that the concerned agency or officials who will be entrusted with the job, will be monitored closely. “People will be given a helpline number through which they can intimate the MCC if the concerned officials do not come to their place for garbage collection”, he said.

Decision taken against toll-gate in city limits

When a corporator raised the issue of the proposed toll-gate at Surathkal and the Deputy Commissioner's initiative in this regard a couple of weeks ago, other corporators joined in and demanded that no toll-gate be allowed inside city limits. Corporator Harish Surathkal said that as per laws the distance between toll-gates has to be 80 kms and in special cases a maximum of 60 kms. But the said toll-gate is being set up within a distance of 30 kms which is a blatant violation.

Mayor Gulzar Banu declared that no toll gate would be allowed inside city limits and a written intimation in this regard would be sent to the Deputy Commissioner.

mcc5

mcc2_copy_copy

mcc3

mcc4


Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
October 3,2024

brahmingundurao.jpg

Karnataka Health Minister Dinesh Gundu Rao reminded that V D Savarkar was not against cow slaughter as he himself was non-veg eater, PTI reported on Thursday.

"As a Brahmin he was eating meat, and he was openly propagating eating meat," said the minister at an event in Bengaluru.

Reacting to Gundu Rao's claim, BJP MP Anurag Thakur called Congress a "factory of lies" as he warned that India won't tolerate any disrespect towards Savarkar.

"By disrespecting Veer Savarkar they have shown that they don't respect freedom fighters. During the Congress government, Sardar Bhagat Singh was termed a separatist in textbooks...By making those who want to break the nation join the congress party, Rahul Gandhi is taking forward the ideology of 'tukde tukde' and he is a 'modern Jinnah' who speaks ill of the country abroad...," he said.

Meanwhile, a court in Maharashtra's Nashik district summoned Congress MP Rahul Gandhi earlier this week in a defamation case filed against him for his alleged objectionable remarks against the Hindutva ideologue.

The complainant, who is the director of an NGO, claimed he watched a press conference addressed by Gandhi in Hingoli and also a speech made by the Congress leader in November 2022.

He alleged that Gandhi, on the two occasions, by his words and visual representations knowingly harmed the reputation of Veer Savarkar and also tried to defame the latter's image in the society.

According to the complainant, Gandhi said "Savarkar is BJP and RSS jin" which was defamatory in nature.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
September 20,2024

HCpakistanijudge.jpg

New Delhi: The Supreme Court today sought a report from the Karnataka High Court over controversial remarks made by Justice Vedavyasachar Srishananda during a recent court hearing.

Justice Srishananda, while addressing a landlord-tenant dispute, referred to a Muslim-majority area in Bengaluru as "Pakistan" and made a misogynistic comment involving a woman lawyer. 

A five-judge bench led by Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud, along with Justices S Khanna, B R Gavai, S Kant, and H Roy, expressed the need for establishing clear guidelines for constitutional court judges regarding their remarks in court. 

The Supreme Court bench said that when social media plays an active role in monitoring and amplifying courtroom proceedings, there is an urgency to ensure judicial commentary aligns with the decorum expected from courts of law.

"Our attention has been drawn to some comments made by Karnataka High Court judge Justice V Srishananda during the conduct of judicial proceedings. We have asked the AG and SG to assist us. We ask the registrar general of the High Court to submit a report to this court after seeking administrative directions from the Chief Justice of Karnataka High Court. This exercise may be carried out in 2 weeks," the top court directed.

Videos of Justice Srishanananda have gone viral on social media.

In one video, he refers to a Muslim-dominated locality in Bengaluru as "Pakistan" and on another video he was seen making objectionable comments against a woman lawyer. In the second incident, Justice Srishanananda can be heard telling the woman lawyer that she seemed to know a lot about the "opposition party", so much so that she might be able to reveal the colour of their undergarments.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
September 25,2024

siddru.jpg

In a significant development, a special court tasked with handling cases against Members of Parliament and Members of Legislative Assemblies (MP/MLAs) has ordered that a First Information Report (FIR) be filed regarding the Muda case.

Additionally, the Karnataka Lokayukta, which is an anti-corruption body, has been tasked with investigating allegations against Siddaramaiah, who is reportedly involved in the case.

The court instructed the Lokayukta (an anti-corruption authority) to provide a report within three months. It also ordered the relevant authorities to file a First Information Report (FIR) regarding the case.

Judge Santhosh Gajanan Bhat issued the directive, compelling the Mysuru Lokayukta police to commence an investigation following a formal complaint lodged by Snehamayi Krishna. 

The Karnataka Lokayukta in Mysuru is required to carry out the investigation under Section 156 (3) of the Criminal Procedure Code, which mandates the registration of a First Information Report (FIR).

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.