Mixed responses for LS majority for FDI in Mangalore

[email protected] (CD Network)
December 6, 2012

fdi_copy

Mangalore, December 6: The ruling UPA government comfortably defeated the opposition-sponsored motion against Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in retail in Lok Sabha on Wednesday. Concerns over its implementation in the country continue to be raised.

Even as the nation is discussing the pros and cons of Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in retail, the central government repeated its claim that states which do not want to implement the system are free not to do so. Karnataka being ruled by the BJP will not allow FDI in the state, at least as long as it stays in power but things could change after the Assembly polls.

The entry of FDI in Mangalore is also currently out of question as according to the requirements laid down by the central government, entry of FDI has been restricted to cities having a population of 10,00,000 or more. Mangalore, according to the 2011 census, has a population of 4,84,785.

However, concerns are being raised in the coastal city too. This is what various stakeholders have to say:

M G Hegde, JDS leader

The whole political ruckus created by the BJP is just a farce. Both Congress and the BJP agree in principal internally that FDI must be introduced. The world is getting small these days. We cannot be reacting in a sensitive manner to issues like FDI. However, it must be introduced in such a way that our local traders do not suffer. That said, if states do not want to introduce FDI, they have the choice not to do so. For FDI to be introduced, the cities must have a population of 10,00,000 or more. Most of these cities are in states ruled by the opposition parties so it is not going to make that big a difference.

N Yogish Bhat, Deputy Speaker, Karnataka Legislative Assembly

Investment in the field of infrastructure or power generation is welcome but not in the retail sector. Irrespective of whether it will come to Mangalore or not, the policy itself is one which hampers the growth of the citizens of the country because there are so many people involved in retail trade.

Muneer Katipalla, CPI (M) leader

When LPG (Liberalisation, Privatisation, Globalisation) policy was accepted by the government in 1991, it had said that there is no question of bringing FDI in the country. But today that promise has been broken. Similarly, we have seen governments break several other promises one after the other with regard to economic reforms and hence, although Mangalore remains out of the FDI ambit at present, don't be surprised if rules are amended in two years' time to bring cities with lesser population like Mangalore to also suffer at the hands of foreign companies.

Mohammed Ameen, President, Kanara Chamber of Commerce and Industry (KCCI), Mangalore:

True that the smaller retailers have a challenge up front but I feel it will help in the unorganized retail sector get organized. What the entry of these malls has done is it has opened up options for people. Mangaloreans who would earlier have to resort to bargaining to buy a product in a retail outlet without being sure of its quality, have now got a competitive market where even branded items are being sold at discount sales in several shops. These malls have even generated employment opportunities. And although it may appear that there is a huge crowd flocking to malls, it is also true that most of them just go there to hang out and not really for shopping. So I see scope for smaller retail players to continue existing because they will continue to have their customers coming to them

Dinesh M P, Proprietor, Yempi Family Shop:

“Smaller retailers like us work on the basis of a daily turnover target. Even if we lose ten customers, it concerns us. It's a fast pace life today and people look for convenience. If someone wants to buy clothes at our shop, to have some juice they need to go somewhere else, which is not the case in a mall where there is everything under one roof. There has been an impact to some extent for sure.

Harekal Narendra Nayak, Managing Partner, ‘Ganesh Bazaar' store:

The quality of products sold in the malls is not all that good. Not only has our existing customer base remained intact, we are getting these new customers too. Our 35 year old store is a brand in itself and our service and relationship that we have with our customers, have made sure that we continue to do good business in spite of these malls and one-stop markets coming up. Although I do feel that some other smaller retailers have suffered owing to this trend, I do not see shops like ours, or other shops like Fathima Stores and Jimmy's which also have built that reputation over a period of time, suffering. But a policy like FDI will certainly spell doom for the small retailers as they will lose their livelihood.

Ahmed Sharief, Owner, Fathima Traders

Malls have affected our business to some extent. It has become a fashion now for people to go to malls and do all the shopping. And if FDI makes its way into Mangalore, then certainly the situation will get worse. These corporate giants will then engage in direct supply and the distribution channel has no place in their functioning. Some hypermarkets actually run in loss as they keep lower rates to attract customers but their corporate backing and network is so strong that they can easily sustain that loss for months together. Whereas retailers like us cannot afford to keep that kind of a margin.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
September 20,2024

HCpakistanijudge.jpg

New Delhi: The Supreme Court today sought a report from the Karnataka High Court over controversial remarks made by Justice Vedavyasachar Srishananda during a recent court hearing.

Justice Srishananda, while addressing a landlord-tenant dispute, referred to a Muslim-majority area in Bengaluru as "Pakistan" and made a misogynistic comment involving a woman lawyer. 

A five-judge bench led by Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud, along with Justices S Khanna, B R Gavai, S Kant, and H Roy, expressed the need for establishing clear guidelines for constitutional court judges regarding their remarks in court. 

The Supreme Court bench said that when social media plays an active role in monitoring and amplifying courtroom proceedings, there is an urgency to ensure judicial commentary aligns with the decorum expected from courts of law.

"Our attention has been drawn to some comments made by Karnataka High Court judge Justice V Srishananda during the conduct of judicial proceedings. We have asked the AG and SG to assist us. We ask the registrar general of the High Court to submit a report to this court after seeking administrative directions from the Chief Justice of Karnataka High Court. This exercise may be carried out in 2 weeks," the top court directed.

Videos of Justice Srishanananda have gone viral on social media.

In one video, he refers to a Muslim-dominated locality in Bengaluru as "Pakistan" and on another video he was seen making objectionable comments against a woman lawyer. In the second incident, Justice Srishanananda can be heard telling the woman lawyer that she seemed to know a lot about the "opposition party", so much so that she might be able to reveal the colour of their undergarments.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
September 25,2024

siddru.jpg

In a significant development, a special court tasked with handling cases against Members of Parliament and Members of Legislative Assemblies (MP/MLAs) has ordered that a First Information Report (FIR) be filed regarding the Muda case.

Additionally, the Karnataka Lokayukta, which is an anti-corruption body, has been tasked with investigating allegations against Siddaramaiah, who is reportedly involved in the case.

The court instructed the Lokayukta (an anti-corruption authority) to provide a report within three months. It also ordered the relevant authorities to file a First Information Report (FIR) regarding the case.

Judge Santhosh Gajanan Bhat issued the directive, compelling the Mysuru Lokayukta police to commence an investigation following a formal complaint lodged by Snehamayi Krishna. 

The Karnataka Lokayukta in Mysuru is required to carry out the investigation under Section 156 (3) of the Criminal Procedure Code, which mandates the registration of a First Information Report (FIR).

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
October 4,2024

GTD.jpg

Mysuru: Chairman of JD(S) core committee and Chamundeshwari constituency MLA G T Devegowda on Thursday expressed his solidarity with Chief Minister Siddaramaiah saying the latter need not resign, while lambasting leaders of his own party and alliance partner BJP, including Union Minister H D Kumaraswamy.

In his speech during Mysuru Dasara inauguration he said that if persons against whom FIR is registered have to resign, many leaders from all the three parties, including Opposition Leader R Ashoka, will have to resign.

“All are sitting in glass houses... Since I know Siddaramaiah well, I am talking about him. At a time when mines and real estate are ruling politics, Siddaramaiah has survived in politics. He has never done any favour,” Devegowda said.

He added, “Allegations against Siddaramaiah are unexpected and accidental. If the Governor and Chief Justice order an investigation, it does not mean that he should resign."

He continued, asking, "Have they told Siddaramaiah to resign or have they asked to imprison him? When a person becomes a Central minister, he or she should realise their dignity and responsibility. Instead of recognising the good work done by Siddaramaiah, they ask him to resign. Will Kumarswamy (facing an FIR) resign? Should Siddaramaiah, who has become CM with a support of 135 MLAs, resign?"

"Opposition leaders are not remembering the good work of earlier CMs Kengal Hanumanthaiah, Veerendra Patil, Ramakrishna Hegde, H D Deve Gowda or S M Krishna. Karnataka is a model state. It is a bad trend to topple an elected government which is doing good work,” he further said.

Devegowda added, “Siddaramaiah is Goddess Chamundeshwari’s ‘Varaputra’ and hence has her blessings during tough times. He won the election in Chamundeshwari Assembly constituency, when the BJP-JD(S) government was in power in 2006. With the blessings of the Goddess, he has held varied positions right from becoming an MLA for the first time in 1983. He presented 15 budgets and has become CM for a second time. He took H C Mahadevappa, a Dalit leader to the state level. Siddaramaiah has the support of Deputy CM D K Shivakumar as ‘Jodeththu’. Blessings of the beneficiaries of guarantee schemes are with him (Siddaramaiah).” 

Siddaramaiah said, “Devegowda was a MUDA member. He knows the truth. Hence, he is saying this. His words have filled strength in me. ‘Satyameva Jayate’, Truth will always triumph.” 

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.