Consumers must check weight of LPG cylinder on delivery''

[email protected] (CD Network, Photos by Ahmed Anwar )
January 29, 2013
gas1
 

Mangalore, Jan 29: Cooking gas is turning out to be all the precious and while apprehensions have always been there with regard to the weight of the gas while delivery, the officials say that the customers do have the right to weigh the cylinders during delivery from gas agencies.

Addressing a grievances meet organized by Gas Matthu Padithara Balakedaarara Vedike, at Town Hall, Mangalore on Monday, Bharat Petroleum Company Representative Venugopal said that there are several complaints with regard to variation in the weight of the cylinder on delivery but not many consumers know that they have the right to check the weight of the cylinders.

“In every gas supplying vehicle, there will be equipments and weight checking facilities available. Customers must ask the distribution personnel to carry out a weight check of the gas cylinders before them,” Mr. Venugopal said.

Another citizen complained that certain gas agencies are forcing people to buy stoves and other materials, threatening them of not providing with gas cylinders if they refuse to do so. Responding to the question,  Mr. Venugopal said that in LPG centres, certain allied facilities and equipments are provided to people purely on an optional basis. If there is any attempt made to make people buy them forcefully, a complaint should be registered with the sales officer of the gas agency concerned, he said.

Sharanabasappa, Deputy Director, Department of Food and Civil Supplies, DK, exhorted people present in the gathering on the occasion to stop applying for ration cards merely for the sake of an identification proof. “Ration cards should be meant for receiving ration. Why don't you question the banks or anyone who demands ration card as address proof as to whether there is a directive from the government to do so?”, he said.

P B Harish Rai, President, DK District Working Journalists' Association, Mangalore, demanded officials present in the gathering to provide people with statistics of gas cylinders being sold in black by people themselves and not shy away from their responsibilities. He also asked as to whether there is a government directive which states that gas cylinders must be supplied only after 21 days or whether this rule has been framed by gas agencies themselves.

On the issue of inconveniences caused to people with respect to gas delivery from a gas agency in Ullal raised by a citizen, U T Khader, MLA, said that a single gas agency takes care of people's needs from Ullal to Mudipu and suggested the officials present at the meet to set up more agencies in the region and divide the area of supply so that there are lesser customers to deal with.

Mr. Khader also suggested that a 'Gas Adaalath' be held in every Assembly constituency once in every three months so that people's complaints are dealt with effectively.

An online memorandum was submitted to M Veerappa Moily, Union Petroleum Minister, on the occasion via e-mail by the Vedike. The memorandum included demands such as steps to subsidize 12 domestic gas cylinders a year, holding of a survey in every Taluk to set up more gas agencies for the benefit of the public, provision of filling cylinders on time for people, setting up of complaint cells in local governing bodies, compulsory handing over of 'Gas Card' and cash bill along with the date of delivery at the time of delivery of gas cylinders, continuance of two gas connections obtained legally by customers and non-cancellation of these connections, provision of fire extinguishers in gas cylinder delivery vehicles etc.

Shashiraj Rao Kavoor, Advocate, Consumer Court, Mangalore, Dharmendra K, President, Gas Mattu Padithara Balakedaarara Vedike, Mangalore, Muhammad Siddiq Jakribettu, Chief Secretary of the Vedike, were present among others.

GS_2

GS_3

GS_4

GS_5

GS_6

GS_7

GS_8

GS_9

GS_10

GS_11

GS_12

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
September 28,2024

muni.jpg

Bengaluru, Sep 28: The Special Investigation Team (SIT) probing charges against arrested Karnataka BJP MLA N. Munirathna Naidu, including allegations of rape, honey-trapping, and other offences, on Saturday conducted raids at his residence and 15 other locations across the city.

Sources confirmed that the raids were taking place at his Vyalikaval residence and other properties owned by the BJP MLA. The operation is being conducted by the SIT under the Criminal Investigation Department (CID) led by ACP Kavitha.

The team is examining documents, electronic devices, and other materials related to the rape and honey-trapping case. The SIT is being supported by experts from the Forensic Science Laboratory (FSL), with Superintendent of Police (SP) Sowmya Latha also participating in the search and inspection at Munirathna’s Vyalikaval residence.

According to sources, the raids were triggered by information provided by the victim, who alleged that Munirathna recorded footage of sexual assaults and used it to blackmail politicians and public servants, including IAS and IPS officers.

The victim reportedly revealed that she was used to entrap the woman who had lodged a rape case against a senior IFS officer. She was allegedly instructed to frame the rape victim in a drug peddling case.

The complainant told police that she was tasked with capturing compromising videos of the rape victim who had filed the case against the IFS officer. She claimed that, after several failed attempts to obtain the videos, the victim was drugged with sleeping pills, and obscene footage was recorded without her consent. Later, the IFS officer was bailed out from the charges.

Furthermore, the complainant has accused MLA Munirathna of raping her at his office within the state legislature, in his official vehicle, and at his godown. She has alleged that he recorded videos of these assaults.

Police sources also revealed that the victim in the MLA's case provided details of a plot involving sending HIV-infected women to Munirathna's targets in an attempt to ruin them politically and personally. She also disclosed the names of several politicians whom she had entrapped through honey-trapping.

The woman further claimed that Munirathna had threatened to have her son kidnapped and killed if she refused to comply with his demands. According to her, the MLA had a well-organised team dedicated to carrying out these honey-trapping operations, and she provided details about his close associates and relatives involved in the scheme.

Munirathna, who was in judicial custody following his arrest in the rape and honey-trap case, has now been taken into the custody of the SIT.

The MLA was transferred from Bengaluru Central Jail to the CID office on the night of September 24. The BJP legislator, however, has denied all the allegations, claiming they are false.

Karnataka Congress leader D.K. Suresh had alleged that Munirathna was trying to infect his adversaries with HIV and that the government should investigate the matter.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
October 3,2024

brahmingundurao.jpg

Karnataka Health Minister Dinesh Gundu Rao reminded that V D Savarkar was not against cow slaughter as he himself was non-veg eater, PTI reported on Thursday.

"As a Brahmin he was eating meat, and he was openly propagating eating meat," said the minister at an event in Bengaluru.

Reacting to Gundu Rao's claim, BJP MP Anurag Thakur called Congress a "factory of lies" as he warned that India won't tolerate any disrespect towards Savarkar.

"By disrespecting Veer Savarkar they have shown that they don't respect freedom fighters. During the Congress government, Sardar Bhagat Singh was termed a separatist in textbooks...By making those who want to break the nation join the congress party, Rahul Gandhi is taking forward the ideology of 'tukde tukde' and he is a 'modern Jinnah' who speaks ill of the country abroad...," he said.

Meanwhile, a court in Maharashtra's Nashik district summoned Congress MP Rahul Gandhi earlier this week in a defamation case filed against him for his alleged objectionable remarks against the Hindutva ideologue.

The complainant, who is the director of an NGO, claimed he watched a press conference addressed by Gandhi in Hingoli and also a speech made by the Congress leader in November 2022.

He alleged that Gandhi, on the two occasions, by his words and visual representations knowingly harmed the reputation of Veer Savarkar and also tried to defame the latter's image in the society.

According to the complainant, Gandhi said "Savarkar is BJP and RSS jin" which was defamatory in nature.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
September 24,2024

siddaramaiah.jpg

The Karnataka High Court on Tuesday dismissed the petition filed by Chief Minister Siddaramaiah against Governor Thawarchand Gehlot's decision to sanction the complaint and investigation against him in the alleged Mysore Urban Development Authority (MUDA) scam case.

Justice M Nagaprasanna said the facts narrated in the petition would undoubtedly require an investigation.

The court has also said that the Governor's order approving sanction to investigate against Siddaramaiah under section 17A of the Prevention of Corruption Act does not suffer from application of mind, instead has abundance of application of mind.

Meanwhile, the court rejected the request made by senior advocate Abhishek Singhvi to stay the order of the court. The court has vacated the interim order passed on August 19. In the interim order the trial court was directed not to take any precipitative action against Siddaramaiah. On August 17, Governor had approved sanction under section 17 A  of the Prevention of Corruption Act and Section 218 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita ( BNSS), citing three applications.

The court said the private complainants were justified in registering the complaint and seeking approval from the governor.

Insofar as private complainants seeking sanction under section 17A, the court said the provision nowhere requires only a police officer to seek sanction from a competent authority. The court further said it is in fact the duty of the private complainants to seek such approval.

Earlier, The High Court had completed its hearing in the case on September 12, and reserved its orders. It had also directed a special court in Bengaluru to defer further proceedings and not to take any precipitative action against the Chief Minister.

The case pertains to allegations that compensatory sites were allotted to Siddaramaiah's wife B M Parvathi in an upmarket area in Mysuru that had higher property value as compared to the location of her land that had been "acquired" by MUDA.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.