Exclusion from election committee irks former mayor

February 20, 2013

ashraf

Mangalore, Feb 20: In what can be called an episode of high packed drama, former mayor K Ashraf voiced strong objections at a press conference held by DK District Congress Committee, with regard to the selection of members for the newly formed district-level election committee constituted to select candidates for the upcoming urban local body elections.

Expressing strong dissent on his exclusion from the District Election and Manifesto Committee announced by veteran Congress leader B Janardhan Poojary, Mangalore City Block Congress unit president and former Mayor K Ashraf raised questions on the formation of the committee and staged a walk-out during the press conference.

With this, the in-fighting in Dakshina Kannada District Congress Committee has been exposed out in the open yet again, despite repeated attempts to prove that internal conflicts had been banished.

Interrupting Janardhan Poojary in the press conference, Ashraf demanded to know the reason behind his exclusion from the election committee inspite of him being the city block congress president. Ashraf went on to accuse Poojary of playing politics of double-standards. He expressed frustration at being ignored in the formation of the committee, and accused Poojary of showing prejudice against Muslims.

"Doesn't the block congress president deserve to be included? Are you condemning me for being a Muslim,” he questioned and walked out of the office.

Later, speaking to few mediapersons, he said that it was sheer injustice that a block congress president had been neglected by the party.

“Inspite of having experience as a Mayor, how can they overlook me? My efforts as a Mayor have already been proven. How can they form a committee without people's support? They should have deliberated before forming one,” he complained, adding that he did not desire authority, but merely wanted the party to come up.

Protesting against Poojary's dictatorship, he said that being appointed as the party's district electoral in-charge, he had to behave and act in accordance with the post. “What have the ones he has selected done for the party? I know better about preparing a manifesto than them. My experience as a Mayor counts. It is my responsibility to guarantee seats from my wards. Was it right to select inexperienced members in the manifesto list,” he said.

Stating that he was not targeting anyone in particular, he said that convening a meeting to discuss party affairs at a place of worship (instead of the party office) was not acceptable as it was a sacred place.This is why, he said, he opted to remain absence at the meeting held on Tuesday.

When asked if his condemnations would damage the party's image, he replied that the party did not suffer impairment from him, but from their own activities.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
September 25,2024

siddru.jpg

In a significant development, a special court tasked with handling cases against Members of Parliament and Members of Legislative Assemblies (MP/MLAs) has ordered that a First Information Report (FIR) be filed regarding the Muda case.

Additionally, the Karnataka Lokayukta, which is an anti-corruption body, has been tasked with investigating allegations against Siddaramaiah, who is reportedly involved in the case.

The court instructed the Lokayukta (an anti-corruption authority) to provide a report within three months. It also ordered the relevant authorities to file a First Information Report (FIR) regarding the case.

Judge Santhosh Gajanan Bhat issued the directive, compelling the Mysuru Lokayukta police to commence an investigation following a formal complaint lodged by Snehamayi Krishna. 

The Karnataka Lokayukta in Mysuru is required to carry out the investigation under Section 156 (3) of the Criminal Procedure Code, which mandates the registration of a First Information Report (FIR).

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
September 24,2024

siddaramaiah.jpg

The Karnataka High Court on Tuesday dismissed the petition filed by Chief Minister Siddaramaiah against Governor Thawarchand Gehlot's decision to sanction the complaint and investigation against him in the alleged Mysore Urban Development Authority (MUDA) scam case.

Justice M Nagaprasanna said the facts narrated in the petition would undoubtedly require an investigation.

The court has also said that the Governor's order approving sanction to investigate against Siddaramaiah under section 17A of the Prevention of Corruption Act does not suffer from application of mind, instead has abundance of application of mind.

Meanwhile, the court rejected the request made by senior advocate Abhishek Singhvi to stay the order of the court. The court has vacated the interim order passed on August 19. In the interim order the trial court was directed not to take any precipitative action against Siddaramaiah. On August 17, Governor had approved sanction under section 17 A  of the Prevention of Corruption Act and Section 218 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita ( BNSS), citing three applications.

The court said the private complainants were justified in registering the complaint and seeking approval from the governor.

Insofar as private complainants seeking sanction under section 17A, the court said the provision nowhere requires only a police officer to seek sanction from a competent authority. The court further said it is in fact the duty of the private complainants to seek such approval.

Earlier, The High Court had completed its hearing in the case on September 12, and reserved its orders. It had also directed a special court in Bengaluru to defer further proceedings and not to take any precipitative action against the Chief Minister.

The case pertains to allegations that compensatory sites were allotted to Siddaramaiah's wife B M Parvathi in an upmarket area in Mysuru that had higher property value as compared to the location of her land that had been "acquired" by MUDA.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
September 24,2024

rainsDK.jpg

Mangaluru, Sept 24: A blanket of gloom descended over Dakshina Kannada and Udupi as heavy rains battered the coastal Karnataka districts on Tuesday. Substantial rainfall has been drenching the region since Monday, intensifying as the day progressed.

In Dakshina Kannada, torrential downpours began early Tuesday, followed by overcast skies and humid conditions. 

The showers persisted intermittently through the afternoon, with areas like Beltangady experiencing moderate rainfall, while Puttur and Bellare bore the brunt of heavier storms. 

Overnight showers were reported in Bantwal, and Mangaluru city, along with its surrounding rural areas, witnessed a steady increase in rainfall, peaking by the evening.

After a brief respite, the return of intense rainfall has brought a welcome drop in temperatures. In Udupi, Karkala, Udupi city, Kundapur, and Hebri taluks all faced substantial rains throughout the day, continuing from late Sunday night.

The Indian Meteorological Department (IMD) has issued a red alert for the coastal districts, predicting more heavy rainfall in the coming hours. 

A yellow alert has been placed for Wednesday, signaling the likelihood of additional downpours. Fishermen have been cautioned to remain vigilant, as the possibility of strong winds looms over the coastal waters.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.