Appoint efficient leaders to restore Muslim unity'

[email protected] (CD Network, Photos by Suresh Vamanjoor)
March 10, 2013

Mangalore, Mar 10: Lack of unity among Muslims is a byproduct of appointment of undeserving people as leaders and lack of will among followers to obey their leaders, said Moulana Abdul Ghafoor Jama'ee, Salafi scholar.

Speaking after the inauguration of a one-day conference on the theme 'Touheed: For Purity and Forgiveness' in Mangalore organised by South Karnataka Salafi Movement (SKSM), Moulana Jama'ee said that lack of proper leadership as well as lack of will among fellow community members to obey their leaders have hurt Muslim unity and encouraged groupism immensely.

“The basis of unity for Muslims is in following Allah and His messenger (pbuh). Irrespective of whichever Jamaath or faction one comes from, no one disagrees with the fact that they have to follow the 'Kitaab-o-Sunnah' (Quran and Hadith). People also agree that we must interpret the Quran and Sunnah the way companions of the Prophet (pbuh) understood them. But the problem lies in acceptance of leadership. People are not willing to obey the 'Ameers' (leaders). The Prophet (pbuh) stressed on obeying the leader immensely. There is no room for dissent of leadership in Shariah. Look at what is happening in Yemen, Syria and the Arab world. Has the rebellion solved the problem? The more people come forward in disobeying their leader, the more factions will come into force. It is a different matter that the leader will be accountable before Allah and he will be questioned for his deeds and the way he treated the people who were under him”, Moulana Jama'ee said.

Moulana Jama'ee however, also stressed on the need to appoint the right people as leaders. “The Prophet (pbuh) said that appointment of undeserving candidates as leaders is one of the signs of Qiyaamah (doomsday). It is important to ensure that the right people are chosen while appointing  people to important positions. However, irrespective of what the leader does, the followers' duty is to obey their leader and observe 'sabr' (patience)”, he said.

Stating that difference of opinion existed among the companions of the Prophet (pbuh) too, Moulana Jama'ee sought to clarify that those differences of opinion were concerning minor issues. “There was never a conflict between them in matters of 'Aqeedah' (faith)”, he said.

SKSM_2

SKSM_3

SKSM_4

SKSM_5

SKSM_9

SKSM_10

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
September 24,2024

siddaramaiah.jpg

The Karnataka High Court on Tuesday dismissed the petition filed by Chief Minister Siddaramaiah against Governor Thawarchand Gehlot's decision to sanction the complaint and investigation against him in the alleged Mysore Urban Development Authority (MUDA) scam case.

Justice M Nagaprasanna said the facts narrated in the petition would undoubtedly require an investigation.

The court has also said that the Governor's order approving sanction to investigate against Siddaramaiah under section 17A of the Prevention of Corruption Act does not suffer from application of mind, instead has abundance of application of mind.

Meanwhile, the court rejected the request made by senior advocate Abhishek Singhvi to stay the order of the court. The court has vacated the interim order passed on August 19. In the interim order the trial court was directed not to take any precipitative action against Siddaramaiah. On August 17, Governor had approved sanction under section 17 A  of the Prevention of Corruption Act and Section 218 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita ( BNSS), citing three applications.

The court said the private complainants were justified in registering the complaint and seeking approval from the governor.

Insofar as private complainants seeking sanction under section 17A, the court said the provision nowhere requires only a police officer to seek sanction from a competent authority. The court further said it is in fact the duty of the private complainants to seek such approval.

Earlier, The High Court had completed its hearing in the case on September 12, and reserved its orders. It had also directed a special court in Bengaluru to defer further proceedings and not to take any precipitative action against the Chief Minister.

The case pertains to allegations that compensatory sites were allotted to Siddaramaiah's wife B M Parvathi in an upmarket area in Mysuru that had higher property value as compared to the location of her land that had been "acquired" by MUDA.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.