Governor accepts CM's recommendation; Renuka dropped from ministry

[email protected] (CD Network)
March 27, 2013
renu
Bangalore, Mar 27: Rebel minister M.P. Renukacharya was sacked Wednesday following his expulsion from the ruling BJP for six years on disciplinary grounds.

A Raj Bhavan communique said Governor H.R. Bhardwaj had accepted the recommendation of Chief Minister Jagadish Shettar to drop the excise minister.

Renukacharya was expelled from the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) late Tuesday.

The rebel lawmaker from Honnali assembly segment in Davangere district, about 310 km from here, Tuesday embarrassed the ruling party by accusing its former chief minister D.V. Sadananda Gowda of receiving money from him and being corrupt.

Though Renukacharya had threatened to quit the faction-ridden BJP to join the Karnataka Janata Party (KJP) of former BJP's chief minister B.S. Yeddyurappa, ruling party's state unit president Pralhad Joshi expelled him from the primary membership after Gowda and Shettar sought swift action against him for indulging in loose talk and making false charges.

Renukacharya had told local news channels at Honnali that Gowda had taken a huge sum of money from him during the Udupi-Chickmagalur parliamentary by-election in March 2012, which the BJP forfeited to the Congress.

Gowda, who represented the Lok Sabha constituency, resigned after he became the ruling party's second chief minister in the state in August 2011 and got elected to the state legislative council last year.

The controversial member, however, did not quantify the amount of money he had given to Gowda but claimed that he had documentary evidence to prove the charge.

He also accused BJP's national general secretary Ananth Kumar, party's former state unit president K.S. Eshwarappa and Joshi of being equally corrupt.

As Yeddyurappa's die-hard loyalist, Renukacharya has been smarting over the weeks after the party denied tickets to his nominees in the March 7 local body elections in his assembly constituency where the BJP fared well.

Apprehending that he would not be given party ticket to contest in the ensuing state legislative assembly election May 5, Renukacharya said he would join Yeddyurappa by this weekend and fight against the BJP from his home constituency on KJP ticket.

Renukacharya also accused a prominent state RSS (Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh) leader of minting money after the BJP came to power in Karnataka for the first time in May 2008.

Gowda, however, rubbished Renukacharya's claims and told reporters in Bangalore "everybody knows Renukacharya's character".

Gowda also recalled that he had ordered a probe into allegations that Renukacharya was involved in corruption in the excise ministry during his tenure as chief minister.

Gowda, however, resigned from the chief minister post in July 2012 following revolt by Yeddyurappa's loyalists and supporters.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
September 25,2024

siddru.jpg

In a significant development, a special court tasked with handling cases against Members of Parliament and Members of Legislative Assemblies (MP/MLAs) has ordered that a First Information Report (FIR) be filed regarding the Muda case.

Additionally, the Karnataka Lokayukta, which is an anti-corruption body, has been tasked with investigating allegations against Siddaramaiah, who is reportedly involved in the case.

The court instructed the Lokayukta (an anti-corruption authority) to provide a report within three months. It also ordered the relevant authorities to file a First Information Report (FIR) regarding the case.

Judge Santhosh Gajanan Bhat issued the directive, compelling the Mysuru Lokayukta police to commence an investigation following a formal complaint lodged by Snehamayi Krishna. 

The Karnataka Lokayukta in Mysuru is required to carry out the investigation under Section 156 (3) of the Criminal Procedure Code, which mandates the registration of a First Information Report (FIR).

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
September 24,2024

siddaramaiah.jpg

The Karnataka High Court on Tuesday dismissed the petition filed by Chief Minister Siddaramaiah against Governor Thawarchand Gehlot's decision to sanction the complaint and investigation against him in the alleged Mysore Urban Development Authority (MUDA) scam case.

Justice M Nagaprasanna said the facts narrated in the petition would undoubtedly require an investigation.

The court has also said that the Governor's order approving sanction to investigate against Siddaramaiah under section 17A of the Prevention of Corruption Act does not suffer from application of mind, instead has abundance of application of mind.

Meanwhile, the court rejected the request made by senior advocate Abhishek Singhvi to stay the order of the court. The court has vacated the interim order passed on August 19. In the interim order the trial court was directed not to take any precipitative action against Siddaramaiah. On August 17, Governor had approved sanction under section 17 A  of the Prevention of Corruption Act and Section 218 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita ( BNSS), citing three applications.

The court said the private complainants were justified in registering the complaint and seeking approval from the governor.

Insofar as private complainants seeking sanction under section 17A, the court said the provision nowhere requires only a police officer to seek sanction from a competent authority. The court further said it is in fact the duty of the private complainants to seek such approval.

Earlier, The High Court had completed its hearing in the case on September 12, and reserved its orders. It had also directed a special court in Bengaluru to defer further proceedings and not to take any precipitative action against the Chief Minister.

The case pertains to allegations that compensatory sites were allotted to Siddaramaiah's wife B M Parvathi in an upmarket area in Mysuru that had higher property value as compared to the location of her land that had been "acquired" by MUDA.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.