Saudi: Nitaqat enforcement triggers shock waves among expatriates; many arrested

[email protected] (News Network)
March 28, 2013
Riyadh, Mar 28: Thousands of Indian expatriate workers including a number of NRIs from Kerala and coastal districts of Karnataka employed in the small and medium enterprises in Saudi Arabia are likely to be hit hard as the Kingdom goes ahead with its plans to expand employment avenues for its own nationals.

As the deadline for implementing the new policy called Nitaqat, ended Wednesday, labor authorities, supported by police, stepped up a major campaign to drive out 'illegal workers' as well as those involved in cover-up businesses in different parts of the Kingdom.

saudi_arabia

The move has triggered shock waves among expatriates, especially those who are not working for their sponsors.

Police have reportedly arrested a large number of expatriates for violating iqama and labor regulations during the past week, sources said.

Many shops and firms have been closed down in Riyadh, Jeddah and Dammam as they either did not have enough workers under their sponsorship or fear punitive action.

According to a report in the wake of Arab Spring uprisings, the Saudi government views unemployment among nationals as a long-term strategic challenge that needs to be handled effectively. A study by the Saudi Central Department of Statistics and Information, fixed the unemployment rate in the country last year at 12.2 per cent. That meant that more than 588,000 people were without jobs.

Other estimates suggest that an alarming 39 per cent of the youth in the 15-25 years old category, are unemployed. Consequently, the Kingdom has adopted the Nitaqat programme — a plan to push its nationals into employment in companies that are colour coded to deter expatriates from monopolising their workforce.

Thus, firms falling into the red zone are the worst offenders as they have, according to the Kingdom's grading criteria, failed to employ the minimum quota of Saudi nationals in their workforce.

Those in the yellow slot have also fallen short of their targets, but, despite their poor showing, have been recognised for their effort to employ Saudi nationals. Companies in the green zone fall in the blue chip category as they have fully complied with the Kingdom's latest labour laws. As a result they are allowed to expand their workforce by employing a larger number of expatriates. The Nitaqat programme does not cover those businesses that employ less than 10 people.

The Saudi road map of employment generation has now reached a stage when it threatens the livelihood of nearly two million expatriates, the majority of whom are Indians employed in the small and medium enterprises category. The Saudi daily Arab Newsported that “at least two million expatriates may lose their jobs or leave the Kingdom shortly as about 250,000 small and medium enterprises will be listed in the Red category of the Labour Ministry's Nitaqat system on Wednesday.”

As of now, there are no signs that the Saudi authorities are in a mood to bend the rules. “The Kingdom will not allow anybody to continue violating its regulations because it harms public interests. If the laws are not followed, the interior and labour ministries will take maximum measures by law against the violators,” Labour Minister Adel Farkeih was quoted as saying.

The affected workers in the red-designated companies are set to face considerable distress as their work permits will not be renewed — a situation that would automatically lead to the cancellation of their residency permits.

Saudi media reports warn that according to a new law passed by the Saudi, the Interior Ministry can arrest and deport the violators of the residency laws. Despite the minimum requirement of Saudi nationals in less paying jobs, observers say that the labour laws are likely to undermine the development of the Kingdom's infrastructure and real estate sectors, which employ a large number of blue collar workers.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
October 3,2024

brahmingundurao.jpg

Karnataka Health Minister Dinesh Gundu Rao reminded that V D Savarkar was not against cow slaughter as he himself was non-veg eater, PTI reported on Thursday.

"As a Brahmin he was eating meat, and he was openly propagating eating meat," said the minister at an event in Bengaluru.

Reacting to Gundu Rao's claim, BJP MP Anurag Thakur called Congress a "factory of lies" as he warned that India won't tolerate any disrespect towards Savarkar.

"By disrespecting Veer Savarkar they have shown that they don't respect freedom fighters. During the Congress government, Sardar Bhagat Singh was termed a separatist in textbooks...By making those who want to break the nation join the congress party, Rahul Gandhi is taking forward the ideology of 'tukde tukde' and he is a 'modern Jinnah' who speaks ill of the country abroad...," he said.

Meanwhile, a court in Maharashtra's Nashik district summoned Congress MP Rahul Gandhi earlier this week in a defamation case filed against him for his alleged objectionable remarks against the Hindutva ideologue.

The complainant, who is the director of an NGO, claimed he watched a press conference addressed by Gandhi in Hingoli and also a speech made by the Congress leader in November 2022.

He alleged that Gandhi, on the two occasions, by his words and visual representations knowingly harmed the reputation of Veer Savarkar and also tried to defame the latter's image in the society.

According to the complainant, Gandhi said "Savarkar is BJP and RSS jin" which was defamatory in nature.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
September 25,2024

siddru.jpg

In a significant development, a special court tasked with handling cases against Members of Parliament and Members of Legislative Assemblies (MP/MLAs) has ordered that a First Information Report (FIR) be filed regarding the Muda case.

Additionally, the Karnataka Lokayukta, which is an anti-corruption body, has been tasked with investigating allegations against Siddaramaiah, who is reportedly involved in the case.

The court instructed the Lokayukta (an anti-corruption authority) to provide a report within three months. It also ordered the relevant authorities to file a First Information Report (FIR) regarding the case.

Judge Santhosh Gajanan Bhat issued the directive, compelling the Mysuru Lokayukta police to commence an investigation following a formal complaint lodged by Snehamayi Krishna. 

The Karnataka Lokayukta in Mysuru is required to carry out the investigation under Section 156 (3) of the Criminal Procedure Code, which mandates the registration of a First Information Report (FIR).

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
September 24,2024

siddaramaiah.jpg

The Karnataka High Court on Tuesday dismissed the petition filed by Chief Minister Siddaramaiah against Governor Thawarchand Gehlot's decision to sanction the complaint and investigation against him in the alleged Mysore Urban Development Authority (MUDA) scam case.

Justice M Nagaprasanna said the facts narrated in the petition would undoubtedly require an investigation.

The court has also said that the Governor's order approving sanction to investigate against Siddaramaiah under section 17A of the Prevention of Corruption Act does not suffer from application of mind, instead has abundance of application of mind.

Meanwhile, the court rejected the request made by senior advocate Abhishek Singhvi to stay the order of the court. The court has vacated the interim order passed on August 19. In the interim order the trial court was directed not to take any precipitative action against Siddaramaiah. On August 17, Governor had approved sanction under section 17 A  of the Prevention of Corruption Act and Section 218 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita ( BNSS), citing three applications.

The court said the private complainants were justified in registering the complaint and seeking approval from the governor.

Insofar as private complainants seeking sanction under section 17A, the court said the provision nowhere requires only a police officer to seek sanction from a competent authority. The court further said it is in fact the duty of the private complainants to seek such approval.

Earlier, The High Court had completed its hearing in the case on September 12, and reserved its orders. It had also directed a special court in Bengaluru to defer further proceedings and not to take any precipitative action against the Chief Minister.

The case pertains to allegations that compensatory sites were allotted to Siddaramaiah's wife B M Parvathi in an upmarket area in Mysuru that had higher property value as compared to the location of her land that had been "acquired" by MUDA.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.