SDPI campaigns for repeal of 'draconian amendments' in UAPA

[email protected] (CD Network)
June 28, 2013

Mangalore, Jun 28: Social Democratic Party of India (SDPI), Karnataka, organised a symposium in the city on Friday, as part of its ten-day awareness campaign against the 'draconian amendments' in the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA), 2008.

In his introductory address at the symposium organised at NGO Hall, Mangalore, Dakshina Kannada district SDPI general secretary Akbar Ali highlighted the possibility of UAPA being misused by the police to harass innocent individuals. Largely targeting minorities such as Muslims and people from backward classes, he said that the law in question should be repealed.

Speaking on the occasion, senior advocate K Purushottam Poojary said that a person was innocent till he is proven guilty and it was wrong to keep him imprisoned till it was proven.

The UAPA is a determent to the basic fundamental rights provided to citizens of India under Article 19. Every person also has a right to apply for bail if arrested. According to the Article 21 in the Constitution of India, no person could be deprived of his personal liberty except according to the procedure established by law. While the procedure is so clear, what trial can be expected if bail is curtailed for a period of six months? If the law have to be rectified, it has to be questioned, he said, adding that measures had to be taken to repeal the UAPA.

High court advocate P K Ponnappa said that there was a need to examine whether there were any flaws in the existing system of law in the country. Based on our Constitution, the law of the country follows procedures as per the guidelines in it. The procedures associated with the law to examine and probe culprits indulging in terror activities should be lawfully right, without violating the basic fundamental rights of a person. If the fundamental rights of a person are violated during the course of law, there is a need to change it, which can be done through mass-protests, making amendments or by repealing it, he said.

Advocate from Madikeri Aboobaker said that according to the UAPA, a person could be arrested and kept imprisoned for six months, which could be misused to repress people from backward classes and minorities and curtail their fundamental rights.

Citing examples of individuals wrongly arrested and imprisoned under UAPA, he said that all nine cases registered under the act were against minorities. “Muslims and Dalits are wrongly portrayed as Naxals and terrorists and harassed during imprisonment, and are regarded with suspicion after their release. People have to be made aware of this draconian law, and fight for its repeal,” he said.

On the occasion, Mr Aboobaker said that he was pleased that the police had arrested the accused in the Manipal gang-rape case.

SDPI district president Aboobaker Kulai presided over the programme.

SDPI state secretary Akram Hasan, state committee member Alphonso Franco and district committee member Mohammed U B were present.

sdpi_copy
sdpi_2
sdpi_3

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
October 1,2024

lokayukta.jpg

Mysuru, Oct 1: The Karnataka Lokayukta team on Tuesday arrived at the disputed plot in Mysuru and began investigation into the MUDA case against CM Siddaramaiah and his wife, news agency ANI reported. Snehamayi Krishna, the complainant in the case was also present with the team.

Sources stated that ED sleuths might issue a notice to CM Siddaramaiah at any time and issue summons to him for questioning. The sleuths are also keenly watching the movements of CM Siddaramaiah’s close associates and relatives, including a cabinet minister in connection with the MUDA scam.

Sources further said that there is a possibility of the ED conducting raids across the state on offices and residences of close associates of CM Siddaramaiah. The ED has also gathered information on bank accounts and financial transactions of CM Siddaramaiah and his associates.

The Directorate of Enforcement (ED) on Monday registered an Enforcement Case Information Report (ECIR), equivalent to an FIR by the police, against CM Siddaramaiah over the alleged irregularities in the allotment of 14 sites to his wife Parvathi B.M. by the Mysore Urban Development Authority. The ED registered the case taking cognisance of the FIR registered against the Chief Minister by the Lokayukta police on September 27.

Meanwhile, the Karnataka Lokayukta probing the MUDA case has also expedited the probe. The sleuths led by Mysuru Lokayukta SP T.J. Udesh have visited the controversial land on the outskirts of Mysuru city. The petitioner, Snehamayi Krishna, also accompanied the team.

The move of Chief Minister Siddaramaiah’s wife to return 14 sites allotted by the MUDA to her has triggered a debate. BJP MLA from Mysuru T.S. Srivatsa stated on Tuesday that the move of CM’s wife is not acceptable. "The two commissioners who colluded in the MUDA scam are roaming freely even today," he said.

"CM Siddaramaiah first claimed that there was no scam at all. Later, he formed a commission and now there is an FIR against him. After committing the mistake, you offer to return the sale deed. The time is up. He will have to tender his resignation and I am sure he won’t be in the position until Dasara festivities," MLA T.S. Srivatsa stated.

T.J. Abraham, one of the petitioners in the MUDA case said, “I had demanded the MUDA commissioner to take back the allotted sites. He had written back saying the process would be initiated. They were waiting for the investigation report."

"CM Siddaramaiah has not approached the division bench or the Supreme Court to challenge the order against him because there is nothing to be challenged. Returning sites is not a big sacrifice. The Chief Minister has lost it," Abraham stated. 
 

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
October 3,2024

brahmingundurao.jpg

Karnataka Health Minister Dinesh Gundu Rao reminded that V D Savarkar was not against cow slaughter as he himself was non-veg eater, PTI reported on Thursday.

"As a Brahmin he was eating meat, and he was openly propagating eating meat," said the minister at an event in Bengaluru.

Reacting to Gundu Rao's claim, BJP MP Anurag Thakur called Congress a "factory of lies" as he warned that India won't tolerate any disrespect towards Savarkar.

"By disrespecting Veer Savarkar they have shown that they don't respect freedom fighters. During the Congress government, Sardar Bhagat Singh was termed a separatist in textbooks...By making those who want to break the nation join the congress party, Rahul Gandhi is taking forward the ideology of 'tukde tukde' and he is a 'modern Jinnah' who speaks ill of the country abroad...," he said.

Meanwhile, a court in Maharashtra's Nashik district summoned Congress MP Rahul Gandhi earlier this week in a defamation case filed against him for his alleged objectionable remarks against the Hindutva ideologue.

The complainant, who is the director of an NGO, claimed he watched a press conference addressed by Gandhi in Hingoli and also a speech made by the Congress leader in November 2022.

He alleged that Gandhi, on the two occasions, by his words and visual representations knowingly harmed the reputation of Veer Savarkar and also tried to defame the latter's image in the society.

According to the complainant, Gandhi said "Savarkar is BJP and RSS jin" which was defamatory in nature.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.