Sonia Gandhi tells UPA govt: Time’s running out, so perform

May 23, 2012

UPA-anniversary-Sonia-PM-jpg

New Delhi, May 23: Marking the third anniversary of the UPA II government, Congress chief Sonia Gandhi on Tuesday put the ruling coalition in poll mode, warning her party and allies that they have two years to get their act together as UPA-2 can hope to renew its mandate in 2014 only on the basis of performance rather than promises.

Her remarks came after Prime Minister Manmohan Singh in his speech acknowledged that people were angry and frustrated over corruption. "We know there is public frustration and anger over the issue of corruption. I wish to assure our people that we are working sincerely to address the issue," the PM said in a candid acknowledgement of the problem which is seen as having sapped the goodwill for the government.

Sonia outlined the task ahead, saying, "We are aware that only two years are left when we will be seeking a new mandate from the people. We are fully aware that the result of that will not depend on our promises but on the nature of work done by us."

The wake up call came as the government utilised a function at Prime Minister Manmohan Singh's residence to rebut the damaging charge that UPA-2 was in the grip of a "policy paralysis" by releasing a report that talked of a robust economy and ambitious welfare schemes.

Responding to questions, the PM also pitched in, saying, "The perception (of a policy paralysis) can be misplaced. It can be corrected by reality. The facts can correct the perception."

The function gave the government an opportunity to showcase its numbers in Parliament with Samajwadi leader Mulayam Singh Yadav finding pride of place next to home minister P Chidambaram. A seat for RJD leader Lalu Prasad as well underlined the coalition's comfortable majority in Lok Sabha.

It was Sonia's speech at the dinner to mark three years of UPA-2 that set the tone on a humid May evening when she said that while "opponents were being loud and aggressive, and leveling irresponsible charges", the government must concentrate on working hard and fulfilling its objectives.

On corruption, the PM said the government was trying to set up Lokpal and make a law for time-bound delivery of public goods and services and judicial accountability. "We are trying to ensure exemplary punishment to the guilty while also ensuring that public servants feel secure in taking bona fide decisions that are in the national interest," he further said.

Congress leaders pointed out that since the last six months of a government's terms are invariably overtaken by the dynamics of elections, the government just about has 18 months to deliver on big issues like corruption and the economy. They interpreted Sonia's speech as a reminder that the window for tackling the challenges of perception of sleaze, as well as a slowing economy and stubborn inflation, is rather small.

Reverses in state and civic polls show that the government has reasons to worry. Although the BJP is also in a disarray, many in Congress feel that voters may decide to punish the incumbent without being concerned about political stability.

However, Sonia, who is also UPA chairperson, struck an upbeat note. "There is no room for disappointment (nirasha) even as the country faces a challenging economic situation," she said, pointing to UPA-2's achievements, particularly those that have benefitted the disadvantaged through health insurance and rural employment guarantee schemes.

Sonia's unambiguous remarks can be seen as a early poll bugle as the government has been immersed in crisis management, with the latest preoccupation being managing the presidential election in the face of conditions imposed by assertive allies like Trinamool Congress.

The well-filled stage would give Congress managers some respite as those on stage represent a comfortable majority in Lok Sabha, enough to ensure the ruling coalition lasts its full term.


Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
November 11,2024

birensingh.jpg

The Manipur Kuki MLAs have released a statement calling out Solicitor General Tushar Mehta's 'lies' in the Supreme Court. In a joint statement, the MLAs, including those from the Bharatiya Janata Party, said they had not had any meeting with the Chief Minister since May 3, 2023, nor did they intend to meet him in the future as “he was the mastermind behind the violence”.

As per the MLAs, the SG lied about state CM N Biren Singh speaking to Kuki MLAs to control the situation there, in order to halt a Supreme Court probe into the leaked tapes which allege that Singh has been complicit in the violence that broke out between Kukis and Meitis there.

"We...clarify that we have never had any meeting with Chief Minister, Shri N. Biren Singh since May 3, 2023, nor have any intention to meet him in future as he is the mastermind behind the violence and ethnic cleansing of our people from the Imphal valley, which is continuing till today, the latest being the brutal killing and burning of Mrs Zosangkim Hmar on November 7, 2024," the letter read, while condemning the recent 'barbaric' killing of the woman there, and noting the SG's assertion is 'tantamount' to misleading the top court.

“We, the undersigned ten MLAs, have come to know that during the Supreme Court hearing held on November 8, 2024, the Solicitor General of India submitted that ‘CM is meeting all Kuki MLAs and trying to bring the situation down to get peace’. In this connection, we hereby categorically state that this submission is a blatant lie and tantamount to misleading the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India,” the statement said.

The Supreme Court, while hearing a petition by a Kuki organisation, asked that it submit audio tapes to substantiate its claim that the Chief Minister was instrumental in inciting and organising violence in the northeastern State.

Solicitor-General Tushar Mehta orally informed the court that the Chief Minister was meeting all the Kuki-Zo MLAs and that peace in the State had come at a huge cost.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
November 13,2024

buldozerjustice.jpg

New Delhi: The Supreme Court took a firm stance on ‘bulldozer justice’ today, affirming that the Executive cannot bypass the Judiciary and that the legal process must not prejudge the guilt of an accused. In a significant judgment, the bench led by Justices BR Gavai and KV Viswanathan set new guidelines for demolition practices, responding to petitions challenging the controversial bulldozer actions taken against individuals accused of crimes.

The rise of this practice, termed 'bulldozer justice,' has seen authorities in various states demolish what they claim to be illegal structures belonging to accused individuals. However, multiple petitions questioned the legality and fairness of this approach, bringing the matter before the court.

Justice Gavai highlighted that owning a home is a cherished goal for many families, and an essential question was whether the Executive should have the authority to strip individuals of their shelter. “In a democracy, the rule of law protects citizens from arbitrary actions by the state. The criminal justice system must not assume guilt,” stated the bench, underscoring that due process is a fundamental right under the Constitution.

On the principle of separation of powers, the bench reinforced that the Judiciary alone holds adjudicatory powers and that the Executive cannot overstep these boundaries. Justice Gavai remarked, “When the state demolishes a home purely because its resident is accused of a crime, it violates the doctrine of separation of powers.”

The court issued a strong warning about accountability, stating that public officials who misuse their power or act arbitrarily must face consequences. Justice Gavai observed that selectively demolishing one property while ignoring similar cases suggests that the aim might be to penalize rather than enforce legality. “For most citizens, a house is the product of years of labor and dreams. Taking it away must be an action of last resort, thoroughly justified,” he said.

In its directives under Article 142 of the Constitution, the Supreme Court established new demolition guidelines. These include:

Mandatory Show-Cause Notice: No demolition should occur without first issuing a show-cause notice. The person served has a minimum of 15 days or the duration stated in local laws to respond.

Transparency of Notice Content: The notice must include specifics about the alleged unauthorized construction, the nature of the violation, and the rationale for demolition.

Hearing and Final Order: Authorities are required to hear the response of the affected individual before issuing a final order. The homeowner will have 15 days to address the issue, with demolition proceeding only if no stay order is obtained from an appellate authority.

Contempt Proceedings: Any breach of these guidelines would lead to contempt proceedings. Officials who disregard these norms will be personally accountable for restitution, with costs deducted from their salaries.

Additionally, the court mandated that all municipal bodies establish digital portals within three months, displaying show-cause notices and final orders on unauthorized structures to ensure public transparency and accountability.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.