350 years on, girls enter boys-only school

May 27, 2012

girlsdelhi

New Delhi, May 27: For the first time in its history, burqas will sweep down the narrow stairs and edges of dupattas brush the ancient walls of the Anglo-Arabic Senior Secondary School. No longer only for boys, the 350-year-old school at Ajmeri Gate is girding up for the change, a massive step for a school that recruited its first woman teacher only in 2006. The banner at the entrance says, "Admission [is] open for girls" and for once, along with the students, the school has a lot of prep to do.

The Delhi high court ordering the Directorate of Education and Delhi Police to ensure the school's decision to go co-ed is "duly implemented" made it possible. By Saturday afternoon, four girls had joined - two in Class XI, one in Class VIII, the youngest in VI, and all in English-medium. The school's governing body, Delhi Education Society, is hoping they'll have at least 50 girls using their classrooms by the time term begins.

Three of the four girls were studying at local girls' schools. "I wanted commerce but my school had only arts. That's why I am joining here," says Darakshan Fatima (17). If there's one major flaw in the existing institutions for girls that compels them to seek admission at Anglo-Arabic, it's that they do not offer science or commerce, perhaps assuming girls don't have the temperament for it. "Even when we recruit, almost all the women applicants have studied arts," says Khalil Ahmed, joint secretary, Delhi Education Society. Darakshan hopes to be a chartered accountant and her fellow applicant, Mehwish Rehmani (16), wants to teach math. The other two girls, Gulafshan (12) and Ramsha (13), are sisters of Darakshan.

Having functioned in a particular way for three-and-a-half centuries, the school authorities are trying to make the transition as smooth as possible. At least one toilet has to be freed for the girls and a space cleared up for a common room. The uniform will probably be salwar-kameez-dupatta in grey and white.

"We'll make any investment to make them comfortable," says manager Atyab Siddiqui. "Immediately after school reopens, we will have a workshop with psychologists and counsellors to talk to teachers and students." Science teachers Pervez Ahmed and Aftab Alam have already started talking to their students. "I gave them the example of Hamdard Public School," says Alam. "If our Walled-City kids can attend a co-ed school there, what's wrong with having one here?" Khalil says, "A girls' school was necessary. No new school for girls has come up in the area in the last two-three decades but population has gone up." The school is planning self-defence classes for girls.

"I know Darakshan. If boys trouble her, she'll fix them," says Shahina Furquan, teaching commerce at the Anglo-Arabic Model School - a sister concern operating from the same compound. She had been asked to help draw girls to the school; she approached 60-70 sets of parents. "Most said no directly, some said they'll think about it. Parents are worried about the safety of the girls in a what has been a boys' school for so long," she says.

Only three of the 48 teachers at Anglo-Arabic are women. Faiza Nisar Ali, recruited in 2006, was the first one and was called upon to prepare the "feasibility report". "There are a number of recruitments in the pipeline. We'll give preference to women from now," says Jamia professor Azra Razzack who is the secretary of the school governing body.

All the girls, except one, are shifting from girls' schools. "We have to face boys in college anyway," says Darakshan. "We may as well get used to it now."

That Mehwish is continuing with school at all is the result of a mother's determination to see her daughter succeed. Nazma Perveen's family, even husband, had been against the idea. "But I want Mehwish to go as far as she can,' says Perveen whose academic career was cut short in Class VIII when she got married. "I don't want Mehwish's life to turn out like mine. She wants to teach math. She's very good at it," she says, adding wistfully, "I was too."

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
November 12,2024

ikramuddinkamil.jpg

The Taliban regime has appointed Ikramuddin Kamil as the acting consul in the Afghan mission in Mumbai, Afghan media has reported.

It is the first such appointment made by the Taliban set up to any Afghan mission in India.

There was no immediate comment from the Indian side on the appointment that came.

The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Afghanistan has announced the appointment of Kamil as the acting consul in Mumbai, the Taliban-controlled Bakhtar News Agency reported on Monday, citing unnamed sources.

"He is currently in Mumbai, where he is fulfilling his duties as a diplomat representing the Islamic Emirate," it said.

The appointment is part of Kabul's efforts to strengthen diplomatic ties with India and enhance its presence abroad, the media outlet said

Kamil holds a PhD degree in international law and previously served as the deputy director in the department of security cooperation and border affairs in the foreign ministry, it said.

He is expected to facilitate consular services and represent the interests of Afghanistan in India, the report added.

Kamil's appointment comes days after the external affairs ministry's point-person for Afghanistan held talks with the Taliban's acting defence minister, Mullah Mohammad Yaqoob, in Kabul.

Sher Mohammad Abbas Stanikzai, the Taliban's deputy foreign minister for political affairs, also posted on X about Kamil's appointment.

The appointment of Kamil is seen as part of efforts to facilitate consular services to the Afghan population in Mumbai.

There has been almost negligible presence of diplomatic staff at the Afghan missions in India.

Most of the diplomats appointed by the Ashraf Ghani government have already left India.

In May, Zakia Wardak, the seniormost Afghan diplomat in India, resigned from her position after reports emerged that she was caught at the Mumbai airport for allegedly trying to smuggle 25 kg of gold worth Rs 18.6 crore from Dubai.

Wardak had taken charge as the acting ambassador of Afghanistan to New Delhi late last year, after working as the Afghan consul general in Mumbai for more than two years.

She took charge of the Afghan embassy in New Delhi last November, after the mission helmed by then ambassador Farid Mamundzay announced its closure.

Mamundzay, who was an appointee of the Ghani government, had moved to the United Kingdom.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
November 13,2024

buldozerjustice.jpg

New Delhi: The Supreme Court took a firm stance on ‘bulldozer justice’ today, affirming that the Executive cannot bypass the Judiciary and that the legal process must not prejudge the guilt of an accused. In a significant judgment, the bench led by Justices BR Gavai and KV Viswanathan set new guidelines for demolition practices, responding to petitions challenging the controversial bulldozer actions taken against individuals accused of crimes.

The rise of this practice, termed 'bulldozer justice,' has seen authorities in various states demolish what they claim to be illegal structures belonging to accused individuals. However, multiple petitions questioned the legality and fairness of this approach, bringing the matter before the court.

Justice Gavai highlighted that owning a home is a cherished goal for many families, and an essential question was whether the Executive should have the authority to strip individuals of their shelter. “In a democracy, the rule of law protects citizens from arbitrary actions by the state. The criminal justice system must not assume guilt,” stated the bench, underscoring that due process is a fundamental right under the Constitution.

On the principle of separation of powers, the bench reinforced that the Judiciary alone holds adjudicatory powers and that the Executive cannot overstep these boundaries. Justice Gavai remarked, “When the state demolishes a home purely because its resident is accused of a crime, it violates the doctrine of separation of powers.”

The court issued a strong warning about accountability, stating that public officials who misuse their power or act arbitrarily must face consequences. Justice Gavai observed that selectively demolishing one property while ignoring similar cases suggests that the aim might be to penalize rather than enforce legality. “For most citizens, a house is the product of years of labor and dreams. Taking it away must be an action of last resort, thoroughly justified,” he said.

In its directives under Article 142 of the Constitution, the Supreme Court established new demolition guidelines. These include:

Mandatory Show-Cause Notice: No demolition should occur without first issuing a show-cause notice. The person served has a minimum of 15 days or the duration stated in local laws to respond.

Transparency of Notice Content: The notice must include specifics about the alleged unauthorized construction, the nature of the violation, and the rationale for demolition.

Hearing and Final Order: Authorities are required to hear the response of the affected individual before issuing a final order. The homeowner will have 15 days to address the issue, with demolition proceeding only if no stay order is obtained from an appellate authority.

Contempt Proceedings: Any breach of these guidelines would lead to contempt proceedings. Officials who disregard these norms will be personally accountable for restitution, with costs deducted from their salaries.

Additionally, the court mandated that all municipal bodies establish digital portals within three months, displaying show-cause notices and final orders on unauthorized structures to ensure public transparency and accountability.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.