Kerala bird survey traces Salim Ali's trail

May 28, 2012

Bird

Thiruvananthapuram, May 28: When renowned ornithologist Salim Ali conducted the bird survey of southern Kerala 79 years ago he was moved not just by the region's diversity of avifauna but the panoramic beauty of the setting.

If Ali was alive now, he would certainly be a sad man as serious habitat destruction and degradation pose a grim threat to survival of the bird population in the state.

This is the picture that emerges from a recent bird survey commissioned by the state Forest Department tracing Ali's footprints.

In the 1933 survey, Ali covered the Travancore and Cochin regions of Kerala, both princely states then.

Ali showed interest in surveying this region as part of an initiative of the Bombay Natural History Society to study and record the avian diversity of different regions of India.

The first survey in this series was conducted in the Hyderabad State in 1931 and the exercise covered the central Indian states of Bhopal, Gwalior, Indore and Dhar (1938), Mysore (1939) and Gujarat (1944-48), apart from Travancore and Cochin.

Ali, in his autobiography 'The fall of a sparrow' (1985) noted that "of all my regional bird surveys between the years 1930 and 1950 which I regard as the most productive period of my career, perhaps the one that gave me both as to the field work and writing up its results was the ornithological survey of Travancore-Cochin..."

He also acknowledged that the 1933 survey provided the basis for his work 'The birds of Kerala'

Interestingly, Ali's wife Tehmina was part of the survey throughout and his cousin and leading naturalist Humayun Abdulali took part in it for a short period.

After putting up a proposal to the Travancore Government, all that Ali sought was Rs 2000 to cover travel and incidental expenses, free use of inspection bungalows and forest houses and assistance from local revenue, forest and police officials. "We are lucky that a comprehensive record of birds of South Kerala has been drawn up by an authority in the field like Salim Ali. Though the methodology of bird surveys have changed since 1930s, Ali's accounts have come as a great help when we traced his trail after seven decades", C Sashikumar, who was a member of the 2010 survey, told PTI.

A book titled 'Along the trails of Salim Ali' was brought out by the state Forest Department recently based on the findings of the 2010 survey.

"Apart from the matchless beauty of South Indian hills, the southern extremity of the Sahyadri or Western Ghats, and the lushness and grandeur of their primeval evergreen forests, there was something special in much of their animal and plant life that stood out distinctly from the rest of the peninsula", Ali then observed.

Ali, who made several subsequent trips to Kerala in his eventful career, later voiced concern over the threat posed to the winged beauties by the vanishing of forests and degradation of environment.

In the late 1960s, he noted "since the survey, particularly since our Independence, I have visited Kerala every few years and been more and more depressed and scandalised each time by the mindless vandalism being perpetrated by successive state governments and crooked politicians in the devastation of virgin evergreen forests to settle repatriates and for so-called development projects..."

According to Sashikumar, a leading ornithologist and author of several works and research papers on avifauna, Ali's premonitions have come true as the forests have been destroyed largely for converting them into plantations, felling trees or for big projects like hydro-electric power.

"The recent survey has clearly brought out this poor picture and stringent conservation initiatives are essential to protect the nature from further assault," he said.

The survey, which painstakingly followed Ali's footprints, found that all species of vultures have become extinct locally in Kerala but for a small breeding population of white-backed vultures in Wayanad in north Kerala.

The survey called for an immediate vulture survey to study the current status and measures for augmenting the existing population.

On the positive side, among the 16 endemic birds, the blue-winged Parakeet, Small Sunbird, Indian Rufous Babbler and White-bellied Treepie have a seemingly healthy population.

However, high altitude birds like Grey-breasted Laughing Thrush, Black-and-Orange Flycatchers, White-bellied Shortwing and Nilgiri Flycatcher are facing serious habitat destructions and fragmentation.

Similarly, large-scale decline of Nilgiri Wood pigeon, an IUCN Red List category (a list which assesses the risk of extinction to species within a political management unit) is a cause for concern.

According to ornithologists, the Western Ghats, a major segment of Indian bio-diversity, has 16 endemic species of birds, which are found nowhere else in the world, the survey findings noted.

But this ecological hot spot is facing grim threat and its low land forests have almost completely been decimated and remaining parts severely fragmented, harming bio-diversity of the Ghats.

The recommendations include total ban on traffic through the pristine Anamudi Shola National Park, protection of the relict Shola patches as conservation reserves, regeneration of Silent Valley-Karinkulam Grass land, conservation of bird prey, regular monitoring of threatened bird species and regulation of tourism in sensitive areas like Eravikulam National Park, Sashikumar said.

Conservation of wetland areas like those around the lakes and backwaters is an area that called for urgent measures. Since the land in these areas are mostly in private possession, a community initiative is required for their protection.

Sashikumar said a bird survey of the northern district of Kerala, known as the Malabar region, was conducted a couple of years ago but it was yet to be published in the book form by the Forest Department.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
November 13,2024

buldozerjustice.jpg

New Delhi: The Supreme Court took a firm stance on ‘bulldozer justice’ today, affirming that the Executive cannot bypass the Judiciary and that the legal process must not prejudge the guilt of an accused. In a significant judgment, the bench led by Justices BR Gavai and KV Viswanathan set new guidelines for demolition practices, responding to petitions challenging the controversial bulldozer actions taken against individuals accused of crimes.

The rise of this practice, termed 'bulldozer justice,' has seen authorities in various states demolish what they claim to be illegal structures belonging to accused individuals. However, multiple petitions questioned the legality and fairness of this approach, bringing the matter before the court.

Justice Gavai highlighted that owning a home is a cherished goal for many families, and an essential question was whether the Executive should have the authority to strip individuals of their shelter. “In a democracy, the rule of law protects citizens from arbitrary actions by the state. The criminal justice system must not assume guilt,” stated the bench, underscoring that due process is a fundamental right under the Constitution.

On the principle of separation of powers, the bench reinforced that the Judiciary alone holds adjudicatory powers and that the Executive cannot overstep these boundaries. Justice Gavai remarked, “When the state demolishes a home purely because its resident is accused of a crime, it violates the doctrine of separation of powers.”

The court issued a strong warning about accountability, stating that public officials who misuse their power or act arbitrarily must face consequences. Justice Gavai observed that selectively demolishing one property while ignoring similar cases suggests that the aim might be to penalize rather than enforce legality. “For most citizens, a house is the product of years of labor and dreams. Taking it away must be an action of last resort, thoroughly justified,” he said.

In its directives under Article 142 of the Constitution, the Supreme Court established new demolition guidelines. These include:

Mandatory Show-Cause Notice: No demolition should occur without first issuing a show-cause notice. The person served has a minimum of 15 days or the duration stated in local laws to respond.

Transparency of Notice Content: The notice must include specifics about the alleged unauthorized construction, the nature of the violation, and the rationale for demolition.

Hearing and Final Order: Authorities are required to hear the response of the affected individual before issuing a final order. The homeowner will have 15 days to address the issue, with demolition proceeding only if no stay order is obtained from an appellate authority.

Contempt Proceedings: Any breach of these guidelines would lead to contempt proceedings. Officials who disregard these norms will be personally accountable for restitution, with costs deducted from their salaries.

Additionally, the court mandated that all municipal bodies establish digital portals within three months, displaying show-cause notices and final orders on unauthorized structures to ensure public transparency and accountability.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
November 11,2024

birensingh.jpg

The Manipur Kuki MLAs have released a statement calling out Solicitor General Tushar Mehta's 'lies' in the Supreme Court. In a joint statement, the MLAs, including those from the Bharatiya Janata Party, said they had not had any meeting with the Chief Minister since May 3, 2023, nor did they intend to meet him in the future as “he was the mastermind behind the violence”.

As per the MLAs, the SG lied about state CM N Biren Singh speaking to Kuki MLAs to control the situation there, in order to halt a Supreme Court probe into the leaked tapes which allege that Singh has been complicit in the violence that broke out between Kukis and Meitis there.

"We...clarify that we have never had any meeting with Chief Minister, Shri N. Biren Singh since May 3, 2023, nor have any intention to meet him in future as he is the mastermind behind the violence and ethnic cleansing of our people from the Imphal valley, which is continuing till today, the latest being the brutal killing and burning of Mrs Zosangkim Hmar on November 7, 2024," the letter read, while condemning the recent 'barbaric' killing of the woman there, and noting the SG's assertion is 'tantamount' to misleading the top court.

“We, the undersigned ten MLAs, have come to know that during the Supreme Court hearing held on November 8, 2024, the Solicitor General of India submitted that ‘CM is meeting all Kuki MLAs and trying to bring the situation down to get peace’. In this connection, we hereby categorically state that this submission is a blatant lie and tantamount to misleading the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India,” the statement said.

The Supreme Court, while hearing a petition by a Kuki organisation, asked that it submit audio tapes to substantiate its claim that the Chief Minister was instrumental in inciting and organising violence in the northeastern State.

Solicitor-General Tushar Mehta orally informed the court that the Chief Minister was meeting all the Kuki-Zo MLAs and that peace in the State had come at a huge cost.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.