Petrol price cut: Cabinet minister asks for 'bold step' to check petrol prices

June 3, 2012

vayalar

New Delhi, June 3: Union Minister Vayalar Ravi disapproved of the petrol price hike on Saturday, and suggested a "bold may be taken to reduce the recent increase". The state-run oil companies have announced a reduction of Rs. 2 per litre in petrol prices on Saturday, which became effective from midnight, after increasing the price by Rs.7.50 per litre On May 23.

Minister for Overseas Affairs Mr Ravi, in a letter to Petroleum Minister S Jaipal Reddy, questioned the claims of oil marketing companies that they are incurring huge losses and asked his cabinet colleague to scrutinise the issue in detail. (Read: Vaylar Ravi's letter to Petroleum Minister Jaipal Reddy)

"Apparently, the claim made by oil companies that they are running at a loss seems to be untrue. As a matter of fact, the expenditure of oil companies, including salaries, is among the highest in India and there is a perception that funds are being wasted," Mr Ravi said in the letter.

"In this backdrop, I feel a closer scrutiny is needed before deciding on any further increase in oil prices. Instead, a bold look may be taken at reducing the recent hike," he said.

He is the second Union Minister after Defence Minister A K Antony to have expressed unhappiness at the petrol price increase. Mr Antony had on Wednesday criticised the hike saying it was "not a correct step" and the oil companies should have shown some "propriety" before taking the decision.

Cutting across party lines, leaders have voiced their dissent over the recent petrol price hike. Nationwide protests by Opposition as well as some of the UPA allies, followed by NDA's strike on May 31 clearly put pressure on the government to act.

Even after the announcement, key UPA allies and the Opposition are not happy with the reduction in petrol prices by the state-run oil companies. Dubbing the Rs. two per litre cut in price as 'token', UPA ally Trinamool Congress as well as other opposition parties demanded a 'complete rollback' and said they would not settle for anything less.

Reacting to the state-run oil companies to reduce petrol price, Trinamool Congress chief and West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee said, "I am not happy at the cut in petrol price by Rs. two per litre. It is not enough. It is still a burden on the common man. There should have been a total rollback of the hike."

Terming the reduction in prices as 'totally inadequate', CPI National Secretary D Raja also demanded the oil companies should go for a 'complete rollback' because they had effected "such an outrageously steep hike when international crude prices were declining".

Maintaining that the government's view that it did not have any role in the price fixation for petrol due to de-regulation was 'ridiculous', Mr Raja said the oil companies have been following the government diktats regularly. "Otherwise, why did they not raise the prices when Parliament was in session," said Mr Raja. He said the decision came two days after nationwide protests by Left and other parties.

CPI(M) Politbureau said the partial rollback was "unacceptable" and Left parties will continue their agitation for reversal of the price increase.

BJP spokesperson Rajiv Pratap Rudy also pressed for a 'total rollback' and wondered whether the hike of Rs. 6 per litre after the partial rollback was 'acceptable' to the UPA allies. "I want to know whether they (UPA allies) are worth this," Mr Rudy said. He said people of the country are not satisfied with the token rollback and will teach the UPA a "lesson in the coming days".

Tamil Nadu Chief Minister Jayalalithaa termed the partial rollback as an "eyewash" and demanded a complete rollback. In a statement, the AIADMK supremo said, "This small reduction will not soothe people's anger. It will continue to be a burden on poor and middle class".

She said the decision by the Congress-led UPA to reduce the hike by Rs. two reminded her of the Tamil proverb, "feeding popcorns to the hungry elephant." Recalling her earlier criticism, Ms Jayalalithaa said petrol prices were hiked, when people were already burdened by the price rise because of the Centre's "wrong economic policies."

Odisha Chief Minister Naveen Patnaik too dismissed the partial rollback as 'meaningless'. Mr Patnaik said, "We demand complete roll-back in the hike effected in the price of petrol by the central government recently."

BJD had observed a state-wide bandh on May 31 seeking complete roll-back of petrol price hike and party workers had hit the streets to press for the demand. Mr Patnaik too had participated in the demonstrations against the petrol price hike terming it as a burden on the common people.

However, leaders in Congress have heaved a sigh of relief after drawing flak from allies as well the Opposition over the steep hike in petrol prices earlier. "We are happy that the price of petrol has been reduced by Rs. 2.02 per litre. It will give relief to the common man. Our party has great concern for Aam Admi," party spokesperson Rashid Alvi said.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
November 11,2024

birensingh.jpg

The Manipur Kuki MLAs have released a statement calling out Solicitor General Tushar Mehta's 'lies' in the Supreme Court. In a joint statement, the MLAs, including those from the Bharatiya Janata Party, said they had not had any meeting with the Chief Minister since May 3, 2023, nor did they intend to meet him in the future as “he was the mastermind behind the violence”.

As per the MLAs, the SG lied about state CM N Biren Singh speaking to Kuki MLAs to control the situation there, in order to halt a Supreme Court probe into the leaked tapes which allege that Singh has been complicit in the violence that broke out between Kukis and Meitis there.

"We...clarify that we have never had any meeting with Chief Minister, Shri N. Biren Singh since May 3, 2023, nor have any intention to meet him in future as he is the mastermind behind the violence and ethnic cleansing of our people from the Imphal valley, which is continuing till today, the latest being the brutal killing and burning of Mrs Zosangkim Hmar on November 7, 2024," the letter read, while condemning the recent 'barbaric' killing of the woman there, and noting the SG's assertion is 'tantamount' to misleading the top court.

“We, the undersigned ten MLAs, have come to know that during the Supreme Court hearing held on November 8, 2024, the Solicitor General of India submitted that ‘CM is meeting all Kuki MLAs and trying to bring the situation down to get peace’. In this connection, we hereby categorically state that this submission is a blatant lie and tantamount to misleading the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India,” the statement said.

The Supreme Court, while hearing a petition by a Kuki organisation, asked that it submit audio tapes to substantiate its claim that the Chief Minister was instrumental in inciting and organising violence in the northeastern State.

Solicitor-General Tushar Mehta orally informed the court that the Chief Minister was meeting all the Kuki-Zo MLAs and that peace in the State had come at a huge cost.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
November 13,2024

buldozerjustice.jpg

New Delhi: The Supreme Court took a firm stance on ‘bulldozer justice’ today, affirming that the Executive cannot bypass the Judiciary and that the legal process must not prejudge the guilt of an accused. In a significant judgment, the bench led by Justices BR Gavai and KV Viswanathan set new guidelines for demolition practices, responding to petitions challenging the controversial bulldozer actions taken against individuals accused of crimes.

The rise of this practice, termed 'bulldozer justice,' has seen authorities in various states demolish what they claim to be illegal structures belonging to accused individuals. However, multiple petitions questioned the legality and fairness of this approach, bringing the matter before the court.

Justice Gavai highlighted that owning a home is a cherished goal for many families, and an essential question was whether the Executive should have the authority to strip individuals of their shelter. “In a democracy, the rule of law protects citizens from arbitrary actions by the state. The criminal justice system must not assume guilt,” stated the bench, underscoring that due process is a fundamental right under the Constitution.

On the principle of separation of powers, the bench reinforced that the Judiciary alone holds adjudicatory powers and that the Executive cannot overstep these boundaries. Justice Gavai remarked, “When the state demolishes a home purely because its resident is accused of a crime, it violates the doctrine of separation of powers.”

The court issued a strong warning about accountability, stating that public officials who misuse their power or act arbitrarily must face consequences. Justice Gavai observed that selectively demolishing one property while ignoring similar cases suggests that the aim might be to penalize rather than enforce legality. “For most citizens, a house is the product of years of labor and dreams. Taking it away must be an action of last resort, thoroughly justified,” he said.

In its directives under Article 142 of the Constitution, the Supreme Court established new demolition guidelines. These include:

Mandatory Show-Cause Notice: No demolition should occur without first issuing a show-cause notice. The person served has a minimum of 15 days or the duration stated in local laws to respond.

Transparency of Notice Content: The notice must include specifics about the alleged unauthorized construction, the nature of the violation, and the rationale for demolition.

Hearing and Final Order: Authorities are required to hear the response of the affected individual before issuing a final order. The homeowner will have 15 days to address the issue, with demolition proceeding only if no stay order is obtained from an appellate authority.

Contempt Proceedings: Any breach of these guidelines would lead to contempt proceedings. Officials who disregard these norms will be personally accountable for restitution, with costs deducted from their salaries.

Additionally, the court mandated that all municipal bodies establish digital portals within three months, displaying show-cause notices and final orders on unauthorized structures to ensure public transparency and accountability.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
November 15,2024

amitshah.jpg

Union minister Amit Shah on Friday, November 15, said PM Narendra Modi will amend the Waqf Act despite opposition from leaders like Uddhav Thackeray and Sharad Pawar.

"Modi ji wants to change the Waqf Board law, but Uddhav ji, Sharad Pawar and Supriya Sule are opposing it," Shah said, addressing a rally at Umarkhed in Maharashtra's Yavatmal district.

"Uddhav ji, listen carefully, you all can protest as much as you want, but Modi ji will amend the Waqf Act," he said. Shah said there are two camps in the November 20 Maharashtra assembly polls, one of 'Pandavas' represented by the BJP-led Mahayuti and the other of 'Kauravas' represented by Maha Vikas Aghadi.

"Uddhav Thackeray claims that his Shiv Sena is the real one. Can the real Shiv Sena go against renaming Aurangabad to Sambhajinagar? Can the real Shiv Sena go against renaming Ahmednagar to Ahilyanagar? The real Shiv Sena stands with the BJP," Shah said.

"Rahul Baba used to say that his government would credit money in the accounts of the people instantly. You were unable to fulfil your promises in Himachal, Karnataka, and Telangana," he said.

Shah said the Mahayuti alliance has promised that women will get Rs 2,100 per month under the Ladki Bahin Yojana. "Kashmir is an integral part of India and no power in the world can snatch it away from us," Shah said.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.