It is Rs37,80,000,000,000 loss to the country

August 18, 2012
coal_block

New Delhi, August 18: The CAG reports on allocation of coal blocks, ultra mega power projects and public private partnership in Indira Gandhi international airport have put the UPA government in a tight spot as the revenue loss from these projects amount to a whopping Rs3.78 lakh crore approximately.

Terming it the “biggest ever scam”, the Opposition immediately went for the government’s jugular. For the next few days, one can expect Parliament to witness pandemonium over this as the BJP-led NDA sharpens its claws and prepares to launch a frontal assault on the government.

To make the calculation simpler, let us look at the breakup: For coal allocation, the loss is Rs1.86 lakh crore, for the power projects it is 0.29 lakh crore and for the Indira Gandhi international airport 1.63 lakh crore (as quoted by the Delhi International Airport Limited). The CAG has a conservative figure of Rs24,000 crore.

For the government, this was a huge loss of face because it was prime minister Manmohan Singh who held charge of the coal portfolio when the coal blocks allocations were done. Going by the figures revealed by the CAG (Comptroller and Auditor General), the coal block allocation scam alone is the biggest ever and has caused the government a staggering loss of Rs 1.86 lakh crore. This surpasses the figure of the 2G scam, which hovered around Rs 1.76 lakh crore.

Even as the Opposition demanded Singh’s resignation, the Congress fielded Manish Tiwari to take the brunt of the NDA criticism. Tiwari was scathing in his attack on the CAG reports.

“When the coal blocks have been allotted for captive use and the coal is not for sale, how can the auditor arrive at any figure of the gain that would accrue to the allottees?” he asked.

Stressing that even in the 2G case, the Supreme Court had not endorsed the CAG’s concept of a presumptive loss, Tiwari said the CAG’s calculations have, in fact, no basis.

On the other hand, summarily dismissing the Opposition’s demand for Singh’s resignation, Union coal minister Sriprakash Jaiswal said, “The ministry does not agree with the assessments made by the auditor. There was nothing wrong with the process of finalising the allottees as it was done under the existing process.”

The BJP was unfazed by the Congress logic and its assertions against the CAG. The party made a simple point. It went on insisting that Singh should take moral responsibility and resign. After all, between 2004 and 2009, Singh was for the most part the minister for coal except for brief periods when Jharkhand Mukti Morcha leader Shibu Soren took charge of the portfolio.

BJP leaders Sushma Swaraj and Arun Jaitley came down heavily on the prime minister holding him directly responsible for the loss of Rs1.86 lakh crore to the exchequer. The BJP leaders pointed out that the CAG had shown how the government had not implemented its own decision to allow competitive bidding — a decision which was taken on June 18, 2004.

“He [Singh] has to seriously introspect, impose on himself the moral censure of quitting himself,” Jaitley said.

Swaraj said the party would go on demanding the resignation of the prime minister in Parliament.

In these politically impactful reports, the CAG has slammed the UPA government for delaying the competitive bidding process in the allocation of coal blocks. According to the report tabled in Parliament, 57 coal blocks were allocated to private sector companies that may have resulted in windfall profit for the companies while the government suffered heavy losses.

In another report on ultra mega power projects, the CAG has questioned the government’s decision to allow Reliance Power to use excess coal from the allocated blocks for its other projects.

According to the CAG report, Reliance Power, at the time the contract was awarded, had said the company would be able to use 20 million tonnes from the two blocks and there would be sufficient coal for the Sasan UMPP.

In the same report, the CAG has urged the government to review the award of the Chhatrasaal coal block to Reliance Power for providing level playing field to other power developers. The CAG has pegged the profit of the private power company to Rs29,033 crore.

These three critical reports meant yet another beating for Congress that already has a battered image. Already, the government, suffering from a policy stasis because of a lack of political consensus, has failed to defend itself in the face of huge and unprecedented corruption charges.

Now, the coal block allocation scam threatens to taint the Mr Clean persona of the prime minister. The Congress will require a lot of positive energy to emerge from this crisis with its head held high.


Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
November 15,2024

amitshah.jpg

Union minister Amit Shah on Friday, November 15, said PM Narendra Modi will amend the Waqf Act despite opposition from leaders like Uddhav Thackeray and Sharad Pawar.

"Modi ji wants to change the Waqf Board law, but Uddhav ji, Sharad Pawar and Supriya Sule are opposing it," Shah said, addressing a rally at Umarkhed in Maharashtra's Yavatmal district.

"Uddhav ji, listen carefully, you all can protest as much as you want, but Modi ji will amend the Waqf Act," he said. Shah said there are two camps in the November 20 Maharashtra assembly polls, one of 'Pandavas' represented by the BJP-led Mahayuti and the other of 'Kauravas' represented by Maha Vikas Aghadi.

"Uddhav Thackeray claims that his Shiv Sena is the real one. Can the real Shiv Sena go against renaming Aurangabad to Sambhajinagar? Can the real Shiv Sena go against renaming Ahmednagar to Ahilyanagar? The real Shiv Sena stands with the BJP," Shah said.

"Rahul Baba used to say that his government would credit money in the accounts of the people instantly. You were unable to fulfil your promises in Himachal, Karnataka, and Telangana," he said.

Shah said the Mahayuti alliance has promised that women will get Rs 2,100 per month under the Ladki Bahin Yojana. "Kashmir is an integral part of India and no power in the world can snatch it away from us," Shah said.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
November 13,2024

buldozerjustice.jpg

New Delhi: The Supreme Court took a firm stance on ‘bulldozer justice’ today, affirming that the Executive cannot bypass the Judiciary and that the legal process must not prejudge the guilt of an accused. In a significant judgment, the bench led by Justices BR Gavai and KV Viswanathan set new guidelines for demolition practices, responding to petitions challenging the controversial bulldozer actions taken against individuals accused of crimes.

The rise of this practice, termed 'bulldozer justice,' has seen authorities in various states demolish what they claim to be illegal structures belonging to accused individuals. However, multiple petitions questioned the legality and fairness of this approach, bringing the matter before the court.

Justice Gavai highlighted that owning a home is a cherished goal for many families, and an essential question was whether the Executive should have the authority to strip individuals of their shelter. “In a democracy, the rule of law protects citizens from arbitrary actions by the state. The criminal justice system must not assume guilt,” stated the bench, underscoring that due process is a fundamental right under the Constitution.

On the principle of separation of powers, the bench reinforced that the Judiciary alone holds adjudicatory powers and that the Executive cannot overstep these boundaries. Justice Gavai remarked, “When the state demolishes a home purely because its resident is accused of a crime, it violates the doctrine of separation of powers.”

The court issued a strong warning about accountability, stating that public officials who misuse their power or act arbitrarily must face consequences. Justice Gavai observed that selectively demolishing one property while ignoring similar cases suggests that the aim might be to penalize rather than enforce legality. “For most citizens, a house is the product of years of labor and dreams. Taking it away must be an action of last resort, thoroughly justified,” he said.

In its directives under Article 142 of the Constitution, the Supreme Court established new demolition guidelines. These include:

Mandatory Show-Cause Notice: No demolition should occur without first issuing a show-cause notice. The person served has a minimum of 15 days or the duration stated in local laws to respond.

Transparency of Notice Content: The notice must include specifics about the alleged unauthorized construction, the nature of the violation, and the rationale for demolition.

Hearing and Final Order: Authorities are required to hear the response of the affected individual before issuing a final order. The homeowner will have 15 days to address the issue, with demolition proceeding only if no stay order is obtained from an appellate authority.

Contempt Proceedings: Any breach of these guidelines would lead to contempt proceedings. Officials who disregard these norms will be personally accountable for restitution, with costs deducted from their salaries.

Additionally, the court mandated that all municipal bodies establish digital portals within three months, displaying show-cause notices and final orders on unauthorized structures to ensure public transparency and accountability.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
November 12,2024

ikramuddinkamil.jpg

The Taliban regime has appointed Ikramuddin Kamil as the acting consul in the Afghan mission in Mumbai, Afghan media has reported.

It is the first such appointment made by the Taliban set up to any Afghan mission in India.

There was no immediate comment from the Indian side on the appointment that came.

The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Afghanistan has announced the appointment of Kamil as the acting consul in Mumbai, the Taliban-controlled Bakhtar News Agency reported on Monday, citing unnamed sources.

"He is currently in Mumbai, where he is fulfilling his duties as a diplomat representing the Islamic Emirate," it said.

The appointment is part of Kabul's efforts to strengthen diplomatic ties with India and enhance its presence abroad, the media outlet said

Kamil holds a PhD degree in international law and previously served as the deputy director in the department of security cooperation and border affairs in the foreign ministry, it said.

He is expected to facilitate consular services and represent the interests of Afghanistan in India, the report added.

Kamil's appointment comes days after the external affairs ministry's point-person for Afghanistan held talks with the Taliban's acting defence minister, Mullah Mohammad Yaqoob, in Kabul.

Sher Mohammad Abbas Stanikzai, the Taliban's deputy foreign minister for political affairs, also posted on X about Kamil's appointment.

The appointment of Kamil is seen as part of efforts to facilitate consular services to the Afghan population in Mumbai.

There has been almost negligible presence of diplomatic staff at the Afghan missions in India.

Most of the diplomats appointed by the Ashraf Ghani government have already left India.

In May, Zakia Wardak, the seniormost Afghan diplomat in India, resigned from her position after reports emerged that she was caught at the Mumbai airport for allegedly trying to smuggle 25 kg of gold worth Rs 18.6 crore from Dubai.

Wardak had taken charge as the acting ambassador of Afghanistan to New Delhi late last year, after working as the Afghan consul general in Mumbai for more than two years.

She took charge of the Afghan embassy in New Delhi last November, after the mission helmed by then ambassador Farid Mamundzay announced its closure.

Mamundzay, who was an appointee of the Ghani government, had moved to the United Kingdom.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.