‘Release Kasab or your plane will be hijacked’

Mumbai, October 23: A call about a plane being hijacked to secure the release of 26/11 convict Ajmal Kasab triggered panic and delayed a Bangalore-bound Jet Airways flight, with 46 passengers on board, by around three hours on Monday evening. It turned out to be a hoax call after security agencies carried out a thorough search and investigation.

The airline, it could be recalled, had received a hoax call about a hijack on May 7 as well. Officials are trying to find out if there is any connection between the two incidents.

The flight was scheduled to leave at 4.10pm. Around 4pm, when it was almost ready for take-off—the passengers were in their seats, the gates were bolted and the plane was ready to leave its bay and taxi towards the runway—the airline's call centre received the call.

"The caller said the flight would be hijacked to help secure Kasab's release. The caller reportedly identified himself as Vikas Yadav. The call centre forwarded the information to the airport and the flight was halted," a senior police official said. According to airport officials, the usual protocol was followed soon after. "The passengers were deplaned and individual checks were conducted on them. All hand baggage was checked again. The Central Industrial Security Force and the police also conducted checks on the aircraft to ensure that no prohibited item was hidden on board," an airport official said. "Nothing was found during the checks and the call was declared a hoax," he added. The flight eventually left at 7.30pm with 41 passengers as five flyers reportedly opted for other flights.

A Jet Airways spokesperson confirmed the incident.

Cops said the employee who answered the call found the number familiar. "The call came to the airline's office in MIDC. The staffer said the caller might have contacted them earlier as the number looked familiar. We are trying to trace the number and check if the caller has a history of contacting the call centre," an official said.

Some reports claimed that the caller was the same person who was involved in the May 7 incident. (see box). "There is no such apparent link yet, but we are probing the matter," a security official said. No police complaint has been filed yet.