Diesel price hiked by 45 paise; petrol price cut by 25 paise

[email protected] (Agencies )
January 18, 2013

Diesel

New Delhi, Jan 18: Barely hours after the government permitted oil marketing companies to set diesel prices, the retailers increased the price of the fuel.

Oil companies hiked the price of diesel by 45 paise excluding taxes effective today, Indian Oil said in an official statement. The good news -- petrol prices, which were only earlier this week hiked by 35 paise, will come down by 25 paise per litre.

While the price of petrol is purely market-determined, diesel is still under government control, even though oil firms now have the freedom to make minor revisions in the price.

According to Indian Oil, the hike in diesel price will lead to a cut in under-recoveries by Rs. 3,400 crore till March 2013. "Based on the current prices and volumes, the decrease in the under-recoveries on annual basis on HSD (diesel) shall be approx. Rs.15,000 crore for OMCs (oil marketing companies) as a whole," it said in the release.

Earlier in the day, the government, in a move that could drastically trim its budget-busting subsidy bill, allowed the state-run oil marketing companies to raise the price of subsidised diesel in small amounts every month. According to sources, it has permitted the retailers to raise diesel prices by up to 50 paise every month, news agency Reuters said.

The Cabinet also decided to raise the cap on subsidized cooking gas cylinders (LPG) from six a year to nine for fiscal year 2013-14. However, the oil marketing company stated that no refund shall be admissible on any LPG domestic cylinder already supplied at non-subsidized price from September 2012.

Also, it announced an increase in the price of non-subsidised LPG cylinder by Rs.46.50 per cylinder. However, Indian Oil said: "Any decrease in the under-recoveries on account of increase in price of domestic non-subsidized LPG is estimated to be insignificant as the number of subsided cylinders has been increased."

The hike in LPG cap will increase under-recoveries for all oil marketing companies to Rs.10,000 crore, Indian Oil said.

India's policy to subsidise retail prices of fuels such as diesel, which accounts for about 40 per cent of refined fuel consumption, is a major drain on the budget. State-run refiners currently sell diesel at a loss of Rs. 9.28 per litre.

There had been some speculation that the government would announce an increase in diesel prices, but Oil Minister Veerappa Moily said that decision will now be left to the marketing companies.

The government announcement came with many clarifications that diesel prices are not being de-regulated and that the retailers can make only minor changes.

Finance Minister P Chidamabaram said the oil companies had been "given (the) freedom to make small price corrections".

An order issued by the Oil Ministry post the Cabinet decision stated that bulk users be charged market price. Subsequently, Indian Oil announced that the price for bulk users will be hiked Rs. 9.25 (excluding VAT) over and above the current rate of Rs. 47.15 in Delhi. The government is expected to save about Rs. 9,000 crore of raise in price for retail buyers.

Stocks of oil companies shot up after the news. HPCL ended the day at Rs. 365, 5.43 per cent higher, while the IOC stock closed 6.60 per cent higher at Rs. 315.90. BPCL shares closed 6.06 per cent higher at Rs. 345.60.

The other subsidy decision -- to increase the number of subsidised cylinders allowed per household from six to nine -- comes after much political pressure from not just other parties, but also the Congress, that leads the UPA government at the Centre. The increase will be effective from April 2013; for the remaining part of this fiscal year, ending March 31, 2013, the cap has been hiked to five from three.

The decision to limit the use of subsidised LPG cylinders to six per household was taken by the Manmohan Singh government in September last year as part of a bucket of reforms that saw the Triamool Congress quit the coalition government in a huff, reducing it to a minority in the Lok Sabha.

After many protests, the government had decided on a partial rollback of its LPG decision some time ago.

The Congress had already hiked the cap from six to nine in the states it rules. The Centre had recently written to the Election Commission, seeking permission to raise the cap on LPG cylinders to nine, since elections had been announced in Gujarat and Himachal Pradesh and a model code of conduct was then in place. The commission examined the request and permitted the Centre to raise the cap.

Mr Moily said many Chief Ministers had written to him saying six subsidised LPG cylinders were just not enough.

Ratings agencies threatened last year to strip India of its investment-grade credit rating if the government did not take steps to rein in a widening fiscal deficit. Mr Chidambaram has repeatedly vowed that the deficit will not exceed 5.3 per cent of gross domestic product this financial year.

India imports more than 80 per cent of its fuel needs. The government liberalised petrol prices in June 2010, but has often prevented them from being raised to reflect rising oil prices on global markets.

Fuel consumption in India rose 5 per cent in the last fiscal year, its fastest since 2007-08.

The Oil Ministry had earlier forwarded a note for consideration by the Cabinet, proposing options for meeting a record Rs. 160,000 crore deficit arising from selling auto and cooking fuels below costs.

Sources said since the Finance Ministry has refused to bear any additional subsidy arising from raising the cap on supply of subsidised LPG, the Oil Ministry had proposed to make up for the shortfall by raising prices.

It had proposed a Rs. 3-4.50 per litre hike in the price of diesel and aRs. 100 hike in the price of LPG along with raising the number of subsidised cooking gas cylinders for households to nine a year.

It had also proposed a quarterly increase of Rs. 50 per cylinder from April until the entire losses were wiped off. On diesel, it had proposed a Rs. 3-4.50 per litre hike in one go or in monthly instalments of Re 1 or Rs. 1.50 per litre.

From April, it wanted Re 1 a litre increase in diesel prices every month till such time that the current loss of Rs. 10.16 per litre was wiped out.

According to the ministry's estimates, raising the cap to nine subsidised cylinders will lower savings to Rs. 2,500 crore per annum, compared to the savings of Rs. 12,000 crore estimated when six cylinders are issued at subsidised rates and the rest were sold at market prices.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
November 11,2024

birensingh.jpg

The Manipur Kuki MLAs have released a statement calling out Solicitor General Tushar Mehta's 'lies' in the Supreme Court. In a joint statement, the MLAs, including those from the Bharatiya Janata Party, said they had not had any meeting with the Chief Minister since May 3, 2023, nor did they intend to meet him in the future as “he was the mastermind behind the violence”.

As per the MLAs, the SG lied about state CM N Biren Singh speaking to Kuki MLAs to control the situation there, in order to halt a Supreme Court probe into the leaked tapes which allege that Singh has been complicit in the violence that broke out between Kukis and Meitis there.

"We...clarify that we have never had any meeting with Chief Minister, Shri N. Biren Singh since May 3, 2023, nor have any intention to meet him in future as he is the mastermind behind the violence and ethnic cleansing of our people from the Imphal valley, which is continuing till today, the latest being the brutal killing and burning of Mrs Zosangkim Hmar on November 7, 2024," the letter read, while condemning the recent 'barbaric' killing of the woman there, and noting the SG's assertion is 'tantamount' to misleading the top court.

“We, the undersigned ten MLAs, have come to know that during the Supreme Court hearing held on November 8, 2024, the Solicitor General of India submitted that ‘CM is meeting all Kuki MLAs and trying to bring the situation down to get peace’. In this connection, we hereby categorically state that this submission is a blatant lie and tantamount to misleading the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India,” the statement said.

The Supreme Court, while hearing a petition by a Kuki organisation, asked that it submit audio tapes to substantiate its claim that the Chief Minister was instrumental in inciting and organising violence in the northeastern State.

Solicitor-General Tushar Mehta orally informed the court that the Chief Minister was meeting all the Kuki-Zo MLAs and that peace in the State had come at a huge cost.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
November 13,2024

buldozerjustice.jpg

New Delhi: The Supreme Court took a firm stance on ‘bulldozer justice’ today, affirming that the Executive cannot bypass the Judiciary and that the legal process must not prejudge the guilt of an accused. In a significant judgment, the bench led by Justices BR Gavai and KV Viswanathan set new guidelines for demolition practices, responding to petitions challenging the controversial bulldozer actions taken against individuals accused of crimes.

The rise of this practice, termed 'bulldozer justice,' has seen authorities in various states demolish what they claim to be illegal structures belonging to accused individuals. However, multiple petitions questioned the legality and fairness of this approach, bringing the matter before the court.

Justice Gavai highlighted that owning a home is a cherished goal for many families, and an essential question was whether the Executive should have the authority to strip individuals of their shelter. “In a democracy, the rule of law protects citizens from arbitrary actions by the state. The criminal justice system must not assume guilt,” stated the bench, underscoring that due process is a fundamental right under the Constitution.

On the principle of separation of powers, the bench reinforced that the Judiciary alone holds adjudicatory powers and that the Executive cannot overstep these boundaries. Justice Gavai remarked, “When the state demolishes a home purely because its resident is accused of a crime, it violates the doctrine of separation of powers.”

The court issued a strong warning about accountability, stating that public officials who misuse their power or act arbitrarily must face consequences. Justice Gavai observed that selectively demolishing one property while ignoring similar cases suggests that the aim might be to penalize rather than enforce legality. “For most citizens, a house is the product of years of labor and dreams. Taking it away must be an action of last resort, thoroughly justified,” he said.

In its directives under Article 142 of the Constitution, the Supreme Court established new demolition guidelines. These include:

Mandatory Show-Cause Notice: No demolition should occur without first issuing a show-cause notice. The person served has a minimum of 15 days or the duration stated in local laws to respond.

Transparency of Notice Content: The notice must include specifics about the alleged unauthorized construction, the nature of the violation, and the rationale for demolition.

Hearing and Final Order: Authorities are required to hear the response of the affected individual before issuing a final order. The homeowner will have 15 days to address the issue, with demolition proceeding only if no stay order is obtained from an appellate authority.

Contempt Proceedings: Any breach of these guidelines would lead to contempt proceedings. Officials who disregard these norms will be personally accountable for restitution, with costs deducted from their salaries.

Additionally, the court mandated that all municipal bodies establish digital portals within three months, displaying show-cause notices and final orders on unauthorized structures to ensure public transparency and accountability.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
November 15,2024

amitshah.jpg

Union minister Amit Shah on Friday, November 15, said PM Narendra Modi will amend the Waqf Act despite opposition from leaders like Uddhav Thackeray and Sharad Pawar.

"Modi ji wants to change the Waqf Board law, but Uddhav ji, Sharad Pawar and Supriya Sule are opposing it," Shah said, addressing a rally at Umarkhed in Maharashtra's Yavatmal district.

"Uddhav ji, listen carefully, you all can protest as much as you want, but Modi ji will amend the Waqf Act," he said. Shah said there are two camps in the November 20 Maharashtra assembly polls, one of 'Pandavas' represented by the BJP-led Mahayuti and the other of 'Kauravas' represented by Maha Vikas Aghadi.

"Uddhav Thackeray claims that his Shiv Sena is the real one. Can the real Shiv Sena go against renaming Aurangabad to Sambhajinagar? Can the real Shiv Sena go against renaming Ahmednagar to Ahilyanagar? The real Shiv Sena stands with the BJP," Shah said.

"Rahul Baba used to say that his government would credit money in the accounts of the people instantly. You were unable to fulfil your promises in Himachal, Karnataka, and Telangana," he said.

Shah said the Mahayuti alliance has promised that women will get Rs 2,100 per month under the Ladki Bahin Yojana. "Kashmir is an integral part of India and no power in the world can snatch it away from us," Shah said.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.