Modi govt trying to suppress voice of farmers: H D Deve Gowda

News Network
February 10, 2021

Image result for Modi govt trying to suppress voice of farmers: H D Deve Gowda

Raichur, Feb 10: Alleging that the Union government tried to suppress the voices of farmers in the country by hurriedly implementing the farm laws, former Prime Minister and JD(S) supremo H D Deve Gowda on Tuesday said that this had created unrest in the farming sector.

Addressing the media persons at Yeramarus IB near here, Mr Gowda demanded the government to tell as to why it was trying to 'suppress' the voice of farmers.

''Why has it built a wall? I have raised these questions in the Rajya Sabha. The Centre should not make it a prestigious issue. I will extend full support to the farmers and raise their issue in Parliament,'' he assured.

Replying to a question, Mr Gowda said that West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee will win the Assembly elections again, but with less number of seats.

When asked about Prime Minister Narendra Modi's speech in the Rajya Sabha lauding Congress leader and outgoing Rajya Sabha member Ghulam Nabi Azad, Mr Gowda said, ''He (Azad) is a politician, who is liked by everyone.''

Recollecting the role Mr Azad played during the formation of the coalition government in Karnataka, Mr Gowda said that Mr Azad wanted HD Kumaraswamy as Chief Minister, ''though I had suggested Mallikarjun Kharge's name''.

He ruled out the merger of JD(S) with other parties and said that he will work to strengthen the JD(S), concentrating on the next Assembly elections.

''The state government has not completely waived off the farm loans and I hope it will do so in the coming days. We will not contest the bypolls. The JD (S) will not try to topple the government. Chief Minister BS Yediyurappa has got trust from the voters in the last by-elections,'' he added.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
September 20,2024

Starting in the 2025-26 academic year, private universities in Karnataka offering professional courses will no longer conduct separate entrance exams. This decision follows a directive from the state’s Higher Education Department, prompting private universities to form an association and agree to this significant change.

In a recent meeting with Higher Education Minister Dr. M. C. Sudhakar, representatives from 17 private universities confirmed their decision to discontinue individual entrance tests. Of the 27 private universities in the state, 17 offer professional courses, and they have collectively agreed to accept scores from existing national or state-level entrance exams.

“Some universities will consider JEE scores, others will rely on KCET, and a few are inclined towards COMEDK,” Dr. Sudhakar stated, leaving the choice of examination to the universities themselves. However, the department has also suggested that the universities consider a unified entrance test for admissions.

Looking ahead, Dr. Sudhakar hinted that the government may introduce a common entrance test for general degree courses at private universities as well. "As government colleges and universities currently don’t require entrance exams for general degree courses, we haven’t made any decisions on this yet," he explained.

The meeting also addressed concerns over the high fees charged by private universities. To regulate this, the universities were instructed to establish fee fixation committees, headed by retired judges, as required by law. These committees will be responsible for determining tuition fees. Additionally, the government will continue to regulate fees for 40% of seats in professional courses that are filled through KCET.

In an effort to bring greater uniformity among private institutions, the government is considering enacting a common law for all private universities, which would replace the individual acts currently governing each university. This would place all private universities under a single regulatory framework.

This move is expected to streamline the admissions process and create a more standardized system for both professional and general degree programs across Karnataka's private universities.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
September 20,2024

HCpakistanijudge.jpg

New Delhi: The Supreme Court today sought a report from the Karnataka High Court over controversial remarks made by Justice Vedavyasachar Srishananda during a recent court hearing.

Justice Srishananda, while addressing a landlord-tenant dispute, referred to a Muslim-majority area in Bengaluru as "Pakistan" and made a misogynistic comment involving a woman lawyer. 

A five-judge bench led by Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud, along with Justices S Khanna, B R Gavai, S Kant, and H Roy, expressed the need for establishing clear guidelines for constitutional court judges regarding their remarks in court. 

The Supreme Court bench said that when social media plays an active role in monitoring and amplifying courtroom proceedings, there is an urgency to ensure judicial commentary aligns with the decorum expected from courts of law.

"Our attention has been drawn to some comments made by Karnataka High Court judge Justice V Srishananda during the conduct of judicial proceedings. We have asked the AG and SG to assist us. We ask the registrar general of the High Court to submit a report to this court after seeking administrative directions from the Chief Justice of Karnataka High Court. This exercise may be carried out in 2 weeks," the top court directed.

Videos of Justice Srishanananda have gone viral on social media.

In one video, he refers to a Muslim-dominated locality in Bengaluru as "Pakistan" and on another video he was seen making objectionable comments against a woman lawyer. In the second incident, Justice Srishanananda can be heard telling the woman lawyer that she seemed to know a lot about the "opposition party", so much so that she might be able to reveal the colour of their undergarments.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.