Sode mutt seer invited to offer prayers at Puttige mutt

[email protected] (News Network)
January 15, 2012

seer


Udupi, January 15: Puttige mutt seer Sri Sugunendratheertha Swamiji extended the invitation to Sode Vadiraja mutt seer Sri Vishwavallabhatheertha Swamiji to visit Puttige mutt and seek blessings from mutt deity “Panduranga Vittala”.

He also asked Sode seer to speak to him over the differences and sort out the issue amicably over the controversy of not inviting him to the Paryaya Darbar scheduled to be held on January 18.

Speaking to media persons, Puttige seer informed that coming under tremendous pressure from his followers, he will be obliged to take some decision over attending or not attending the Paryaya Darbar and traditional procession, if Sode seer fails to respond to his invitation before 6 pm on Sunday.

He said as per the tradition put forth by the Madhwa Philosopher and Saint Vadiraja Swami who belongs to Sode Vadiraja mutt, it is the responsibility of all the seers of Asta mutts to take part in the Paryaya celebrations on invitation from the incoming Paryaya seer and the remaining six seers will be the witnesses for the transfer of powers from the outgoing Paryaya seer to the incoming Paryaya seer.

“According to the traditions, the seer who is going to ascend the Paryaya throne should send a letter to all other mutts seeking permission to offer prayers to the deities' of the respective mutts.

However I have not received any letter from Sode seer, rather I am inviting him to visit my mutt and offer prayers to Puttige mutt deity and receive blessings from the Lord. The traditions of Paryaya and Asta mutts hold greater significance in terms of spiritual and religious aspects. The seers are borne with the tasks of taking forward the legacy introduced by our ancestors,” he said.

“I remained silent till date to see that the controversy is solved by itself, however such possibilities seem to be bleak, hence I decided to break my silence. It is true that I visited USA in the year 1992, but the reason was absolutely an attempt to propagate Dharma across the frontiers of America where millions of Indians were eagerly waiting to get in touch with the lost spiritual and religious values.

Besides I have visited more than 20 countries across the globe to proliferate the messages of world peace. Unfortunately, my works have sent wrong signals among people and there has been no attempt done in order to know the real purpose of my foreign tour. Although in the upper layer, the controversy seems to be surrounded by the issue of foreign tour, I personally feel that there are few more issues which remain unknown to me,” he added.

Stating that the problems can be solved only through face to face communication between the two seers, Puttige seer said, except Krishnapur mutt seer, I have been invited by all other seers for their Paryaya. I am hurt that whenever I tried speaking to Sode seer, he just ignored me.

Paryaya Shiroor seer Sri Laxmivaratheertha Swamiji who was present at the press conference, expressed his desire that Puttige seer should be invited to attend Paryaya Darbar.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
September 16,2024

Shaun.jpg

In a heart-breaking incident, 19-year-old Shaun D'Souza, a native of Vittalwadi in Udupi's Kundapur taluk, tragically lost his life in the UAE due to heat stroke.

Shaun, the beloved son of Elias Cyril D'Souza and Pramila D'Souza, originally from Hosabettu, Moodbidri, had been pursuing his college education in the UAE.

He was admitted to a hospital in Ras Al Khaimah, approximately 115 km from Dubai, after collapsing from heatstroke. Despite receiving immediate medical attention, Shaun breathed his last on Sunday, September 15. 

He is deeply mourned by his parents and two siblings. The family, who had been residing near St. Mary's Church in the UAE, are grappling with the profound loss. Shaun’s father, Elias, works as a manager for a private company, while his mother, Pramila, is an accountant.

The local community has come together to offer their support and condolences in this time of sorrow.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
September 20,2024

HCpakistanijudge.jpg

New Delhi: The Supreme Court today sought a report from the Karnataka High Court over controversial remarks made by Justice Vedavyasachar Srishananda during a recent court hearing.

Justice Srishananda, while addressing a landlord-tenant dispute, referred to a Muslim-majority area in Bengaluru as "Pakistan" and made a misogynistic comment involving a woman lawyer. 

A five-judge bench led by Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud, along with Justices S Khanna, B R Gavai, S Kant, and H Roy, expressed the need for establishing clear guidelines for constitutional court judges regarding their remarks in court. 

The Supreme Court bench said that when social media plays an active role in monitoring and amplifying courtroom proceedings, there is an urgency to ensure judicial commentary aligns with the decorum expected from courts of law.

"Our attention has been drawn to some comments made by Karnataka High Court judge Justice V Srishananda during the conduct of judicial proceedings. We have asked the AG and SG to assist us. We ask the registrar general of the High Court to submit a report to this court after seeking administrative directions from the Chief Justice of Karnataka High Court. This exercise may be carried out in 2 weeks," the top court directed.

Videos of Justice Srishanananda have gone viral on social media.

In one video, he refers to a Muslim-dominated locality in Bengaluru as "Pakistan" and on another video he was seen making objectionable comments against a woman lawyer. In the second incident, Justice Srishanananda can be heard telling the woman lawyer that she seemed to know a lot about the "opposition party", so much so that she might be able to reveal the colour of their undergarments.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
September 24,2024

siddaramaiah.jpg

The Karnataka High Court on Tuesday dismissed the petition filed by Chief Minister Siddaramaiah against Governor Thawarchand Gehlot's decision to sanction the complaint and investigation against him in the alleged Mysore Urban Development Authority (MUDA) scam case.

Justice M Nagaprasanna said the facts narrated in the petition would undoubtedly require an investigation.

The court has also said that the Governor's order approving sanction to investigate against Siddaramaiah under section 17A of the Prevention of Corruption Act does not suffer from application of mind, instead has abundance of application of mind.

Meanwhile, the court rejected the request made by senior advocate Abhishek Singhvi to stay the order of the court. The court has vacated the interim order passed on August 19. In the interim order the trial court was directed not to take any precipitative action against Siddaramaiah. On August 17, Governor had approved sanction under section 17 A  of the Prevention of Corruption Act and Section 218 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita ( BNSS), citing three applications.

The court said the private complainants were justified in registering the complaint and seeking approval from the governor.

Insofar as private complainants seeking sanction under section 17A, the court said the provision nowhere requires only a police officer to seek sanction from a competent authority. The court further said it is in fact the duty of the private complainants to seek such approval.

Earlier, The High Court had completed its hearing in the case on September 12, and reserved its orders. It had also directed a special court in Bengaluru to defer further proceedings and not to take any precipitative action against the Chief Minister.

The case pertains to allegations that compensatory sites were allotted to Siddaramaiah's wife B M Parvathi in an upmarket area in Mysuru that had higher property value as compared to the location of her land that had been "acquired" by MUDA.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.