Uddhav attacks BJP on Pak, Ayodhya, beef; rules out break-up

October 23, 2015

Mumbai, Oct 23: Breaking his silence over his party's strained ties with BJP, Shiv Sena president Uddhav Thackeray today attacked the coalition partner on issues like Pakistan, beef, Ram temple and inflation but ruled out walking out of the Maharashtra government any time soon.

Uddhav1
He also said that the Dadri lynching incident brought shame to the country, and not Sena's campaign against cultural or sporting ties with Pakistan.

"If you can get along with (Jammu and Kashmir Chief Minister) Mufti Mohammad Sayeed, then you should also listen to Shiv Sena," Uddhav said, addressing the Sena's traditional Dussehra rally at Shivaji Park in Dadar here this evening.

Referring to speculation of Sena parting ways with BJP, which has criticised it over the Shahryar Khan and Sudheendra Kulkarni incidents, he said, "We know for how long to remain in power. Allow us to work, now that we are in power."

Ridiculing BJP on the Ayodhya issue, he said, "We have been hearing: "Mandir wahin banayenge... Lekin tareekh nahi batayenge (we have been hearing that temple will be built, but not when it will be built)."

Voicing a strong Hindu agenda of the Sena, Uddhav said, "If Hindu is going to be finished, will this country survive?

"Declare this country as Hindu Rashtra and implement common civil code, instead of searching in people's homes for beef," he said in a reference to the lynching of a 50-year-old man in Dadri in Uttar Pradesh over beef eating rumours.

The country's image was maligned because of the Dadri lynching incident and not because of the ink attack on Kulkarni, he said, referring to Sena's protest against the launch function of the book penned by former Pakistan foreign minister Khurshid Kasuri in Mumbai.

"If you have the courage, then enter Pakistan," he said, claiming that Pakistan was keeping tabs on the Sena rally.

"Why speak on cow (beef), instead speak on inflation," the Sena president said. "Why is it not possible to control prices of essential commodities? A government that can't stop price rise is useless.

"If governments can fall on the issue of onion prices, one can't say what will happen over rising inflation," he warned, against the backdrop of skyrocketing prices of pulses.

"First give protection to dal (rising prices) and then to Pakistan," Uddhav said, adding, "why should it cause stomach ache for BJP if we speak against Pakistan."

On Sena's opposition to Ghulam Ali's scheduled concert in Mumbai, he said, "I told organisers that I like songs of Jagjit Singh and Ghulam Ali. However, I also reminded them about killing of Indian soldiers by Pakistan."

On the Sena workers' ink attack on former BJP ideologue Kulkarni for hosting Kasuri, he said, "We applied ink to the red monkey."

Uddhav also criticised Union ministers V K Singh over his remark on the killing of Dalit children and Kiren Rijiju for his comment on north Indians.

"Our Hindutva entails calling Param Veer Chakra awardee Abdul Hameed a hero, a soldier, a son of the soil who saved Kashmir from Pakistani Army," he said.

MIM leader Owaisi bowed his head at Aurangzeb's burial place, Uddhav said, adding "I am ready to bow my head at the 'kabr' of Abdul Hameed."

"We won't leave Marathi manoos and Hindutva at any cost," he said, and recalled that the then President Zail Singh had thanked the late Bal Thackeray for protecting Sikhs in Mumbai and Maharashtra when anti-Sikh riots broke out in 1984.

"Balasaheb also protected Kashmiri Pandits and Amarnath pilgrims," Uddhav said."Let me know now if you agree to my continuing in the post of Sena chief. I will step down if you say so," Uddhav said, putting the question to the crowd.

Aurangzeb Road in Delhi was named after APJ Abdul Kalam, similarly Aurangabad in Maharashtra should be renamed as Sambhajinagar, he said.

Uddhav also paid tributes to Veer Savarkar, and asked, "Did any Congressman suffer for freedom like him." Savarkar should get Bharat Ratna, he demanded.

"Those who objected to death penalty for Yakub Memon committed contempt of court," he said.

He expressed disgust over prolonged incarceration of Lt Col Prasad Purohit and Sadhvi Pragya Singh Thakur in the 2008 Malegaon blast case, saying "Hang them if they are guilty, but prove their guilt first."

He also said killers of Govind Pansare and Narendra Dabholkar should be hanged if they are guilty "but first prove charges against them".

On NCP chief Sharad Pawar's statement that the Sena of yore doesn't exist now, Uddhav said, "Pawar, who appeased Sonia Gandhi for 15 years, should not teach us self respect."

Sena leader Sanjay Raut, who also addressed the rally, taunted BJP over the treatment meted out to L K Advani. "People look up to you as long as you are CM or PM. We see what is the condition of L K Advani today," he said.

Referring to the 'shastra puja' at the rally venue on the occasion of Dussehra, he said, "Next year, there should be an AK-47 and a couple of canons here. Our fight is against Pakistan.

"Also keep a tin of oil paint. That is also a weapon. The whole world recently saw that," Raut said, in an apparent reference to the ink attack on Kulkarni. "You (BJP-led government) are laying red carpet for Pakistan which is killing our soldiers," he said.

On the criticism over his own visit to Pakistan some years ago, Raut said, "I had gone with Atalji (former PM Atal Bihari Vajpayee), not during UPA regime and I had discussed the Pak trip with Balasaheb.

"Pakistan is a part of akhanda (united) Hindustan, which was cut off from us with machination," he said, adding if 50 Sena MPs get elected, "we will drag not only Dawood Ibrahim but also Nawaz Sharif" to India.

"It was the dream of Balasaheb that there should be a Shiv Sena chief minister in Maharashtra. Making a Sena leader PM of the country will be the real tribute to Balasaheb," he said.

Senior Sena leader Ramdas Kadam, who is also a cabinet minister in the state government, spoke of 'rising population' of Muslims in India. "How come the population of only Muslims increased? Is only a single-point agenda being undertaken," he asked said.

On state BJP chief Raosaheb Danve's assurance that protection will be given if an Indo-Pak cricket match is held in Mumbai, he said, "Danve should check (Prime Minister) Modi's statements in the past."

Kadam also referred to the "opposition from some cats to holding Sena rally at Shivaji Park". One such "cat" lives nearby, Kadam said, in an apparent reference to MNS chief Raj Thackeray, whose residence borders the Shivaji Park.

Before the rally, BJP minister Prakash Mehta went to the Thackeray family residence Matoshree in suburban Bandra and met Uddhav. Mehta presented Uddhav a frame which had currency notes from Re 1 to Rs 1000 denomination and also the birth dates of the late Bal Thackeray, his wife Meenatai, Uddhav and Aaditya Thackeray.

Soon after his arrival at Shivaji Park with the wife Rashmi and son Aaditya, the Sena president offered tributes at the memorial of his father.

The rally comes against the backdrop of Sena's strident campaign against visiting Pakistani personalities, and also the Kolhapur and Kalyan Dombivali Municipal Corporation polls in Maharashtra, due on November 1. The Sena and BJP are fighting the civic polls separately.

The simmering tension between the Sena-BJP was evident on Wednesday when the local Shiv Sena leaders put up a poster outside the party headquarters showing the picture of Modi bowing before Bal Thackeray.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
September 17,2024

amitwaqf.jpg

Union Home Minister Amit Shah on Tuesday, September 17, said the Waqf (Amendment) Bill, 2024 will be passed in the Parliament in the coming days. He said the Bill is committed to the management, preservation and misuse of Waqf properties.

The Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC) on the Waqf Bill will meet from September 18 to 20. The JPC is scrutinising the Waqf (Amendment) Bill, 2024 which seeks to amend the Waqf (Amendment) Act of 2013.

On September 14, a Muslim organisation headed by Congress MP Tariq Anwar demanded the rejection of the Waqf (Amendment) Bill. The organisation alleged that the proposed legislation is an "indirect attempt to seize control of Muslim religious properties".

The All India Qaumi Tanzeem submitted 14 pages of suggestions and objections to the bill to the JPC through the Lok Sabha Secretariat.

The Bill was introduced in Lok Sabha on August 8.

On September 11, a Rajya Sabha panel summoned Minority Affairs Ministry officials to explain reasons for the delay in completing the process for framing subordinate legislation under the 2013 Waqf law.

The new bill seeks to change the registration process for Waqf properties through a centralised portal. It proposes several things, including establishing a Central Waqf Council alongside state Waqf Boards with representation to Muslim women and non-Muslim representatives.

A contentious provision of the Bill is the proposal to designate the district collector as the primary authority in determining whether a property is classified as Waqf or government land.

The Waqf (Amendment) Bill also aims at renaming the act to the Unified Waqf Management, Empowerment, Efficiency and Development Act, 1995.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
September 12,2024

New Delhi, Sep 12: Madrasas are "unsuitable" places for children to receive "proper education" and the education imparted there is "not comprehensive" and is against the provisions of the Right to Education Act, the National Commission for Protection of Child Rights (NCPCR) has told the Supreme Court.

The child rights body told the top court that children, who are not in formal schooling system, are deprived of their fundamental right to elementary education, including entitlements such as midday meal, uniform etc.

The NCPCR said madrassas merely teaching from a few NCERT books in the curriculum is a "mere guise" in the name of imparting education and does not ensure that the children are receiving formal and quality education.

"A madrassa is not only a unsuitable/unfit place to receive 'proper' education but also in absence of entitlements as provided under Sections 19, 21,22, 23, 24, 25, and 29 of the RTE Act," it said.

"Further, madrasas do not only render an unsatisfactory and insufficient model for education but also have an arbitrary mode of working which is wholly in absence of a standardised curriculum and functioning," the NCPCR said in its written submissions filed before the top court.

The child rights body stated that due to the absence of provisions of the RTE Act, 2009, the madrassas are also deprived of entitlement as in Section 21 of the Act of 2009.

"A madrassa works in an arbitrary manner and runs in an overall violation of the Constitutional mandate, RTE Act and the Juvenile Justice Act, 2015. It cannot be overlooked that a child getting education in such an Institution will be devoid of basic knowledge of school curriculum which is provided in a school.

"A school is defined under Section 2(n) of the RTE Act, 2009, which means any recognised school imparting elementary education. A madrassa being out of this definition has no right to compel children or their families to receive madrassa education," the NCPCR said.

It said most of the madrassas fail to provide a holistic environment to students, including planning social events, or extracurricular activities for 'experiential learning.

In a breather to about 17 lakh madrassa students, the apex court on April 5 had stayed an order of the Allahabad High Court that scrapped the Uttar Pradesh Board of Madarsa Education Act, 2004 calling it "unconstitutional" and violative of the principle of secularism.

Observing that the issues raised in the petitions merit closer reflection, a three-judge bench headed by Chief Justice D Y Chandrachud had issued notices to the Centre, the Uttar Pradesh government and others on the pleas against the high court order.

The top court said had the high court "prima facie" misconstrued the provisions of the Act, which does not provide for any religious instruction.

The high court had on March 22 declared the Uttar Pradesh Board of Madarsa Education Act, 2004, "unconstitutional" and violative of the principle of secularism, and asked the state government to accommodate students in the formal schooling system.

The high court had declared the law ultra vires on a writ petition filed by advocate Anshuman Singh Rathore.

It had said the state has "no power to create a board for religious education or to establish a board for school education only for a particular religion and philosophy associated with it."

"We hold that the Madarsa Act, 2004, is violative of the principle of secularism, which is a part of the basic structure of the Constitution," the high court had said.

The petitioner had challenged the constitutionality of the UP Madarsa Board as well as objected to the management of madrassas by the Minority Welfare Department instead of the education department.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
September 12,2024

raut.jpg

Prime Minister Narendra Modi's visit to CJI D Y Chandrachud's house for Ganesha puja celebrations has raised doubts in the mind of Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Sanjay Raut, who questioned whether he would deliver 'justice' in the ongoing case the party has in the Supreme Court, given that the PM is the other party in the case.

Speaking to ANI, Raut said "Ganpathi festival is going on, people visit each other's houses. I don't have info regarding how many houses PM visited so far...but PM went to CJI's house and they together performed 'Aarti'."

He said that a custodian of the Constitution meeting politicians could raise doubts in the minds of people.

"In our case, other party is the central govt...Chief Justice should distance himself from this case because his relation with the other party in the case is openly visible," Raut continued.

He also raised questions if the CJI be able to give them justice in the case. "We are getting dates after dates and an illegal govt is going on...Shiv Sena and NCP were broken in such a way...we are not getting justice and PM Modi is taking a lot of interest in the illegal govt of Maharashtra, to save them," the Sena (UBT) leader continued.

Raut alleged that a doubt had been formed in Maharashtra's mind given the 'bond' the PM and the CJI seem to share.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.