We need to contain subsidies, money doesn't grow on trees, Manmohan Singh says

September 21, 2012

Dr.Manmohan-singh

New Delhi, September 21: Justifying the recent decisions on FDI and diesel price hike, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh on Friday said the time has come for "hard decisions" and asked the countrymen not to be misled by those trying to confuse them by spreading fear like in 1991.

In a rare televised address to the nation, he insisted that the concerns over allowing FDI in retail were "baseless" as there is enough scope for big and small retailers to grow.

Noting that fears had been created in 1991 when he as finance minister had initiated economic reforms, Singh said those behind the scare "did not succeed then" and "they will not succeed now".

He justified the hike in diesel price and cap of six cylinders on subsidized LPG, saying these were required in the difficult economic situation and to avoid increase in fiscal deficit that would lead to steep rise in cost of essential commodities.

"No government likes to impose burdens on the common man ... At the same time, it is the responsibility of the government to defend the national interest, and protect the long term future of our people ..." Singh said.

"We have much to do to protect the interests of our nation and we must do it now. At times, we need to say 'no' to the easy option and say 'yes' to the more difficult one. This happens to be one such occasion. The time has come for hard decisions," he said, adding, "for this, I need your trust, your understanding and your cooperation."

He recalled that the last time the nation faced this problem was in 1991. "Nobody was willing to lend us even small amounts of money then. We came out of that crisis by taking strong, resolute steps. You can see the positive results of those steps," he said. "We are not in that situation today, but we must act before people lose confidence in our economy," Singh said.

Underlining that the government was at a "point where we can reverse the slowdown in our growth", he said, "We need a revival in investor confidence domestically and globally. The decisions we have taken recently are necessary for this purpose".

He made the 15-minute address to the nation in Hindi and English against the backdrop of uproar over the recent decisions to allow FDI in multi-brand retail, Rs 5 increase in diesel price and cap on subsidized LPG cylinders.

A tough-talking Prime Minister said, "money doesn't grow on trees. If we had not acted, it would have meant a higher fiscal deficit."

He told the nation that he would do "everything necessary" to put the country back on the path of high and inclusive growth.

"But I need your support. Please do not be misled by those who want to confuse you by spreading fear and false information," Singh appealed to the countrymen, adding he had full faith in their wisdom.

"As Prime Minister of this great country, I appeal to each one of you to strengthen my hands so that we can take our country forward and build a better and more prosperous future for ourselves and for the generations to come," he said.

Contending that his government has been voted to office twice to protect the interests of the 'aam admi', the Prime Minister said, "we must ensure that the economy grows rapidly" which would generate enough productive jobs for the youth of our country. "Rapid growth is also necessary to raise the revenues we need to finance our programmes in education, health care, housing and rural employment," he said.

While justifying the hard decisions of the government, Singh referred to the "great difficulty" being encountered by the world economy with even the US and Europe struggling to deal with an economic slowdown and financial crisis. Even China is slowing down, he said.

"We too have been affected, though I believe we have been able to limit the effect of the global crisis," Singh said.

Recalling that in the past eight years the economy has grown at a record annual rate of 8.2 per cent, the Prime Minister said the government has ensured that poverty has declined much faster, agriculture has grown faster, and rural consumption per person has also grown faster.

"We need to do more, and we will do more. But to achieve inclusiveness we need more growth. And, we must avoid high fiscal deficits which cause a loss of confidence in our economy," Singh said. Referring to the crisis witnessed in 1991, he said, "I would be failing in my duty as Prime Minister of this great country if I did not take strong preventive action."

He said he was determined to see that India is not pushed into a situation like the one encountered by Europe where many countries are not able to pay their bills, have to cut wages or pensions and are looking to others for help. "But I can succeed only if I can persuade you to understand why we had to act," Singh underlined.

Referring to the decision to allow foreign investment in retail trade, he said, "Some think it will hurt small traders. This is not true."

He noted that organised, modern retailing is already present in the country and growing, with all major cities having large retail chains.

Talking specifically about Delhi, Singh said it has many new shopping centres but has also seen a three-fold increase in small shops in recent years.

"In a growing economy, there is enough space for big and small to grow. The fear that small retailers will be wiped out is completely baseless," Singh asserted.

He said the opening of organised retail to foreign investment will benefit farmers.

"According to the regulations we have introduced, those who bring FDI have to invest 50 per cent of their money in building new warehouses, cold-storages, and modern transport systems.

"This will help to ensure that a third of our fruits and vegetables, which at present are wasted because of storage and transit losses, actually reach the consumer. Wastage will go down; prices paid to farmers will go up; and prices paid by consumers will go down," he said.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
November 13,2024

buldozerjustice.jpg

New Delhi: The Supreme Court took a firm stance on ‘bulldozer justice’ today, affirming that the Executive cannot bypass the Judiciary and that the legal process must not prejudge the guilt of an accused. In a significant judgment, the bench led by Justices BR Gavai and KV Viswanathan set new guidelines for demolition practices, responding to petitions challenging the controversial bulldozer actions taken against individuals accused of crimes.

The rise of this practice, termed 'bulldozer justice,' has seen authorities in various states demolish what they claim to be illegal structures belonging to accused individuals. However, multiple petitions questioned the legality and fairness of this approach, bringing the matter before the court.

Justice Gavai highlighted that owning a home is a cherished goal for many families, and an essential question was whether the Executive should have the authority to strip individuals of their shelter. “In a democracy, the rule of law protects citizens from arbitrary actions by the state. The criminal justice system must not assume guilt,” stated the bench, underscoring that due process is a fundamental right under the Constitution.

On the principle of separation of powers, the bench reinforced that the Judiciary alone holds adjudicatory powers and that the Executive cannot overstep these boundaries. Justice Gavai remarked, “When the state demolishes a home purely because its resident is accused of a crime, it violates the doctrine of separation of powers.”

The court issued a strong warning about accountability, stating that public officials who misuse their power or act arbitrarily must face consequences. Justice Gavai observed that selectively demolishing one property while ignoring similar cases suggests that the aim might be to penalize rather than enforce legality. “For most citizens, a house is the product of years of labor and dreams. Taking it away must be an action of last resort, thoroughly justified,” he said.

In its directives under Article 142 of the Constitution, the Supreme Court established new demolition guidelines. These include:

Mandatory Show-Cause Notice: No demolition should occur without first issuing a show-cause notice. The person served has a minimum of 15 days or the duration stated in local laws to respond.

Transparency of Notice Content: The notice must include specifics about the alleged unauthorized construction, the nature of the violation, and the rationale for demolition.

Hearing and Final Order: Authorities are required to hear the response of the affected individual before issuing a final order. The homeowner will have 15 days to address the issue, with demolition proceeding only if no stay order is obtained from an appellate authority.

Contempt Proceedings: Any breach of these guidelines would lead to contempt proceedings. Officials who disregard these norms will be personally accountable for restitution, with costs deducted from their salaries.

Additionally, the court mandated that all municipal bodies establish digital portals within three months, displaying show-cause notices and final orders on unauthorized structures to ensure public transparency and accountability.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
November 15,2024

amitshah.jpg

Union minister Amit Shah on Friday, November 15, said PM Narendra Modi will amend the Waqf Act despite opposition from leaders like Uddhav Thackeray and Sharad Pawar.

"Modi ji wants to change the Waqf Board law, but Uddhav ji, Sharad Pawar and Supriya Sule are opposing it," Shah said, addressing a rally at Umarkhed in Maharashtra's Yavatmal district.

"Uddhav ji, listen carefully, you all can protest as much as you want, but Modi ji will amend the Waqf Act," he said. Shah said there are two camps in the November 20 Maharashtra assembly polls, one of 'Pandavas' represented by the BJP-led Mahayuti and the other of 'Kauravas' represented by Maha Vikas Aghadi.

"Uddhav Thackeray claims that his Shiv Sena is the real one. Can the real Shiv Sena go against renaming Aurangabad to Sambhajinagar? Can the real Shiv Sena go against renaming Ahmednagar to Ahilyanagar? The real Shiv Sena stands with the BJP," Shah said.

"Rahul Baba used to say that his government would credit money in the accounts of the people instantly. You were unable to fulfil your promises in Himachal, Karnataka, and Telangana," he said.

Shah said the Mahayuti alliance has promised that women will get Rs 2,100 per month under the Ladki Bahin Yojana. "Kashmir is an integral part of India and no power in the world can snatch it away from us," Shah said.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
November 11,2024

birensingh.jpg

The Manipur Kuki MLAs have released a statement calling out Solicitor General Tushar Mehta's 'lies' in the Supreme Court. In a joint statement, the MLAs, including those from the Bharatiya Janata Party, said they had not had any meeting with the Chief Minister since May 3, 2023, nor did they intend to meet him in the future as “he was the mastermind behind the violence”.

As per the MLAs, the SG lied about state CM N Biren Singh speaking to Kuki MLAs to control the situation there, in order to halt a Supreme Court probe into the leaked tapes which allege that Singh has been complicit in the violence that broke out between Kukis and Meitis there.

"We...clarify that we have never had any meeting with Chief Minister, Shri N. Biren Singh since May 3, 2023, nor have any intention to meet him in future as he is the mastermind behind the violence and ethnic cleansing of our people from the Imphal valley, which is continuing till today, the latest being the brutal killing and burning of Mrs Zosangkim Hmar on November 7, 2024," the letter read, while condemning the recent 'barbaric' killing of the woman there, and noting the SG's assertion is 'tantamount' to misleading the top court.

“We, the undersigned ten MLAs, have come to know that during the Supreme Court hearing held on November 8, 2024, the Solicitor General of India submitted that ‘CM is meeting all Kuki MLAs and trying to bring the situation down to get peace’. In this connection, we hereby categorically state that this submission is a blatant lie and tantamount to misleading the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India,” the statement said.

The Supreme Court, while hearing a petition by a Kuki organisation, asked that it submit audio tapes to substantiate its claim that the Chief Minister was instrumental in inciting and organising violence in the northeastern State.

Solicitor-General Tushar Mehta orally informed the court that the Chief Minister was meeting all the Kuki-Zo MLAs and that peace in the State had come at a huge cost.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.