Cong corporators protest road widening aimed at benefitting a college linked to a Minister

January 28, 2012

Mangalore, January 28: Congress corporators staged a vociferous protest at a meeting of the Mangalore City Corporation Council here on Friday against the move aimed at benefitting a college linked to a Minister by scuttling a proposal to widen a road.

The issue revolves around the Vikas College of Physiotherapy at Mary Hill which is run by Vikas Education Trust. The college website says that District in-charge Minister J. Krishna Palemar is a member of the trust's governing council.

The councillors did not name the Minister but said that there was a move to ensure that a road passing by the college was not widened contrary to what was envisioned in the revised Master Plan for the city's development for 10 years. The width envisaged is 80 ft.

They said a resolution had been passed by the Mangalore Urban Development Authority (MUDA) to retain the road at its current width. A copy of the resolution circulated to the media, put the current width of the road from Mary Hill to Padavinangady at 6.5 m (21 ft) to 9 m (30 ft). It said a request for retaining the width came from the president of the trust.

Congress councillor Deepak Pujary, who raised the issue, alleged that it was a conspiracy to benefit someone. Councillor Shashidhar Hegde of the Congress said this showed that MUDA favoured the rich builders and described the move as meaningless and condemnable. Councillor Mariamma Thomas said MUDA acted in a whimsical manner.

Councillors from the ruling BJP defended the MUDA action saying there was no need for an 80-foot wide road near the college.

There was another 80-foot road on the other side of the college, they said.

The Congress councillors staged a protest seeking an answer to the issue. Subsequently, the Mayor adjourned the meeting. MUDA official G. Venugopal said the issue had not come to his notice.

However, the resolution would be brought to the notice of people through newspaper advertisements and objections would be considered before its implementation, he added.

Mr. Palemar told The Hindu that he or the college had nothing to lose if the road was widened. He would allow widening of the road if he was convinced that there was a need to widen it. With the MUDA resolution, an aberration was being corrected, he said.

There were only a few houses along the road and there was no need for an 80-foot road, he said.

Later, the corporation council resolved to rename the circle in front Circuit House as “Parashuram Circle.”

It passed a resolution backing the Mayor's action of granting permission to a proposal to supply 18 million litres of water per day to Mangalore Chemicals and Fertilisers and Udupi Power Corporation (Panambur Unit), among others. It referred a matter regarding renaming the Clock Tower Circle as Swami Vivekananda Circle to a standing committee.

MCC__1

MCC__2

MCC__3

MCC__4

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
September 24,2024

siddaramaiah.jpg

The Karnataka High Court on Tuesday dismissed the petition filed by Chief Minister Siddaramaiah against Governor Thawarchand Gehlot's decision to sanction the complaint and investigation against him in the alleged Mysore Urban Development Authority (MUDA) scam case.

Justice M Nagaprasanna said the facts narrated in the petition would undoubtedly require an investigation.

The court has also said that the Governor's order approving sanction to investigate against Siddaramaiah under section 17A of the Prevention of Corruption Act does not suffer from application of mind, instead has abundance of application of mind.

Meanwhile, the court rejected the request made by senior advocate Abhishek Singhvi to stay the order of the court. The court has vacated the interim order passed on August 19. In the interim order the trial court was directed not to take any precipitative action against Siddaramaiah. On August 17, Governor had approved sanction under section 17 A  of the Prevention of Corruption Act and Section 218 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita ( BNSS), citing three applications.

The court said the private complainants were justified in registering the complaint and seeking approval from the governor.

Insofar as private complainants seeking sanction under section 17A, the court said the provision nowhere requires only a police officer to seek sanction from a competent authority. The court further said it is in fact the duty of the private complainants to seek such approval.

Earlier, The High Court had completed its hearing in the case on September 12, and reserved its orders. It had also directed a special court in Bengaluru to defer further proceedings and not to take any precipitative action against the Chief Minister.

The case pertains to allegations that compensatory sites were allotted to Siddaramaiah's wife B M Parvathi in an upmarket area in Mysuru that had higher property value as compared to the location of her land that had been "acquired" by MUDA.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
September 20,2024

DySPnagamangala.jpg

Mandya: The Deputy Superintendent of Police of Nagamangala town in Mandya district has been suspended for "negligence and dereliction of duty" in connection with the clashes that broke out between two groups during a Lord Ganesh idol procession, police said on Friday.

This is the second suspension of a police officer over the clashes on September 11 following which mobs went on a rampage targeting several shops and vehicles leading to tension here.

The situation in the town has since returned to normalcy and most of the shops have started operating. However, adequate security forces continued to be stationed here as a precautionary measure, according to police.

Sumeeth A R, DySP (Nagamangala), was suspended on Thursday for negligence and dereliction of duty, Mandya Superintendent of Police Mallikarjun Baldandi told PTI.

"He (Sumeeth) was not present at the spot nor was he at the police headquarters when the incident occurred. He arrived late at the spot despite the sensitive nature of events," he said.

Earlier, Police Inspector Ashok Kumar posted at Nagamangala town police station was suspended for dereliction of duty in connection with the violence.

A total of 55 people have been arrested in connection with the incident.

According to police, an argument broke out between two groups, when the Ganesh idol procession by devotees from Badarikoppalu village reached a place of worship on September 11, and some miscreants hurled stones, which escalated the situation.

The police had used mild force to disperse the crowd to control the situation.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.
News Network
September 20,2024

HCpakistanijudge.jpg

New Delhi: The Supreme Court today sought a report from the Karnataka High Court over controversial remarks made by Justice Vedavyasachar Srishananda during a recent court hearing.

Justice Srishananda, while addressing a landlord-tenant dispute, referred to a Muslim-majority area in Bengaluru as "Pakistan" and made a misogynistic comment involving a woman lawyer. 

A five-judge bench led by Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud, along with Justices S Khanna, B R Gavai, S Kant, and H Roy, expressed the need for establishing clear guidelines for constitutional court judges regarding their remarks in court. 

The Supreme Court bench said that when social media plays an active role in monitoring and amplifying courtroom proceedings, there is an urgency to ensure judicial commentary aligns with the decorum expected from courts of law.

"Our attention has been drawn to some comments made by Karnataka High Court judge Justice V Srishananda during the conduct of judicial proceedings. We have asked the AG and SG to assist us. We ask the registrar general of the High Court to submit a report to this court after seeking administrative directions from the Chief Justice of Karnataka High Court. This exercise may be carried out in 2 weeks," the top court directed.

Videos of Justice Srishanananda have gone viral on social media.

In one video, he refers to a Muslim-dominated locality in Bengaluru as "Pakistan" and on another video he was seen making objectionable comments against a woman lawyer. In the second incident, Justice Srishanananda can be heard telling the woman lawyer that she seemed to know a lot about the "opposition party", so much so that she might be able to reveal the colour of their undergarments.

Comments

Add new comment

  • Coastaldigest.com reserves the right to delete or block any comments.
  • Coastaldigset.com is not responsible for its readers’ comments.
  • Comments that are abusive, incendiary or irrelevant are strictly prohibited.
  • Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name to avoid reject.